Patellar tracking after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: dynamic evaluation using computed tomography
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
32
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Editora
SPRINGER
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, v.25, n.10, p.3197-3205, 2017
Resumo
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction offers good clinical results with a very low rate of instability recurrence. However, its in vivo effect on patellar tracking is not clearly known. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of MPFL reconstruction on patellar tracking using dynamic 320-detector-row CT. Ten patients with patellofemoral instability referred to isolated MPFL reconstruction surgery were selected and subjected to dynamic CT before and 6 months after surgery. Patellar tilt angles and shift distance were analysed using computer software specifically designed for this purpose. Kujala and Tegner scores were applied, and the radiation of the CTs was recorded. Two protocols for imaging acquisition were compared: a tube potential of 80 kV and 50 mA versus a tube potential of 120 kV and 100 mA, both with a slice thickness of 0.5 mm and an acquisition duration of 10 s. There were no changes in patellar tracking after MPFL reconstruction. There was no instability relapse. Clinical scores improved from a mean of 51.9 (+/- 15.6)-74.2 (+/- 20.9) on the Kujala scale (p = 0.011) and from a median of 2 (range 0-4) to 4 (range 1-6) on the Tegner scale (p = 0.017). The imaging protocols produced a dose-length product (DLP) of 254 versus 1617 mGycm and a radiation effective estimated dose of 0.2 versus 1.3 mSv, respectively. Both protocols allowed the analysis of the studied parameters without loss of precision. Reconstruction of the MPFL produced no improvement in patellar tilt or shift in the population studied. The low-radiation protocol was equally effective in measuring changes in patellar tracking and is recommended. Although the procedure successfully stabilized the patella, knee surgeons should not expect patellar shift and tilt correction when performing isolated patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellar instability. IV.
Palavras-chave
Joint instability, Patellar dislocation, Ligaments/surgery, Orthopaedics, Radiology, Tomography, Tomography, X-ray computed, Multidetector computed tomography, Four-dimensional computed tomography
Referências
- Anderst W, 2009, MED ENG PHYS, V31, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.03.003
- Beck P, 2007, AM J SPORT MED, V35, P1557, DOI 10.1177/0363546507300872
- BEIGHTON P, 1973, ANN RHEUM DIS, V32, P413, DOI 10.1136/ard.32.5.413
- Bey Michael J, 2008, J Orthop Surg Res, V3, P38, DOI 10.1186/1749-799X-3-38
- Biedert RM, 1997, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V116, P77, DOI 10.1007/BF00434106
- Bitar AC, 2015, REV BRAS ORTOP, V46, P675
- Biyani R, 2014, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V22, P2334, DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-3195-y
- Camanho GL, 2007, ARTHROSCOPY, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.008
- CATON J, 1982, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V68, P317
- Deie M, 2005, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V13, P522, DOI 10.1007/s00167-005-0641-x
- Dejour D., 1998, MED HYG, V56, P1466
- Dejour H, 1994, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V2, P19, DOI 10.1007/BF01552649
- Dewey M, 2009, CIRCULATION, V120, P867, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280
- Donell ST, 2006, KNEE, V13, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2006.01.004
- Elias JJ, 2014, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V22, P2350, DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-2905-9
- Feller JA, 2014, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V22, P2470, DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-3132-0
- Fellows RA, 2005, J BIOMECH, V38, P1643, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.021
- Fellows RA, 2005, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V22, P145, DOI 10.1002/jmri.20360
- Fernandez Ernesto, 2005, Acta Orthop Belg, V71, P303
- GALLAND O, 1990, SURG RADIOL ANAT, V12, P119, DOI 10.1007/BF01623337
- Giphart JE, 2012, J BIOMECH, V45, P2935, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.045
- Jan MH, 2009, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V39, P264, DOI 10.2519/jospt.2009.2873
- Kang HJ, 2014, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V22, P2445, DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-3005-6
- Kita K, 2012, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V20, P829, DOI 10.1007/s00167-011-1609-7
- KUJALA UM, 1993, ARTHROSCOPY, V9, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80366-4
- Laprade J, 2005, KNEE, V12, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2004.02.004
- Li GA, 2008, J BIOMECH, V41, P1616, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.034
- MacKay JW, 2014, KNEE, V21, P1052, DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2014.07.019
- MERCHANT AC, 1974, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, VA 56, P1391
- Mikashima Yoshinori, 2006, Acta Orthop Belg, V72, P65
- Nomura E, 2000, KNEE, V7, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0968-0160(00)00038-7
- Nomura E, 2006, ARTHROSCOPY, V22, P787, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.078
- Ostermeier S, 2006, ARTHROSCOPY, V22, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.024
- Park HJ, 2013, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V37, P470, DOI 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318282d978
- Philippot R, 2012, CLIN BIOMECH, V27, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.001
- Pinar H, 1994, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V2, P27, DOI 10.1007/BF01552650
- Rybicki FJ, 2008, INT J CARDIOVAS IMAG, V24, P535, DOI 10.1007/s10554-008-9308-2
- Sandmeier RH, 2000, AM J SPORT MED, V28, P345
- Schneider DK, 2016, AM J SPORT MED, V44, P2993, DOI 10.1177/0363546515624673
- Schottle PB, 2007, AM J SPORT MED, V35, P801, DOI 10.1177/0363546506296415
- Sheehan FT, 2010, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V468, P266, DOI 10.1007/s11999-009-0880-0
- Smith TO, 2012, KNEE, V19, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2011.06.002
- Tecklenburg K, 2006, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V14, P235, DOI 10.1007/s00167-005-0683-0
- TEGNER Y, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P43
- Van Haver A, 2015, AM J SPORT MED, V43, P1354, DOI 10.1177/0363546515572143
- Yamada Y, 2007, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V89B, P752, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.89B6.18515
- Zaffagnini S, 2013, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V21, P2164, DOI 10.1007/s00167-012-2307-9