Outcome Analysis of Immediate and Delayed Conservative Breast Surgery Reconstruction With Mastopexy and Reduction Mammaplasty Techniques

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MUNHOZ_Outcome_Analysis_of_Immediate_and_Delayed_Conservative_Breast_2011.PDF (396.04 KB)
Citações na Scopus
38
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
ALDRIGHI, Claudia Maria
BRASIL, Jose Augusto
ALDRIGHI, Jose Mendes
Citação
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, v.67, n.3, p.220-225, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Bilateral mammaplasty or mastopexy is frequently used for oncoplastic objectives. However, little information has been available regarding outcome following immediate and delayed reconstruction. Method: Patients were divided into Group I (immediate reconstruction) and Group II (delayed reconstruction). Retrospective review was performed to compare complications, length of hospital stay, revision surgeries, and satisfaction. The associations between the complications with potential risk factors (timing, age, body mass index, smoking, and comorbid medical conditions) were analyzed. Results: There were a total of 144 patients with a mean follow-up of 47 months. Of the 106 patients in Group I, complications occurred in 24 (22.6%), skin necrosis was observed in 7.5%, fat necrosis in 5.6%, and 6.6% patients developed local recurrence. Mean period of hospitalization was 1.89 days. Of the 38 patients of the Group II, complications occurred in 12 (31.5%), skin necrosis was observed in 7 (18.4%), fat necrosis in 4 (10.5%), and 5.2% patients developed local recurrence. Mean period of hospitalization was 1.35 days. Increased length of hospital stay greater than 1 day (P < 0.001) and the number of revision surgeries (P = 0.043) were associated with the timing of the reconstruction. In univariate analysis, no difference between groups was found with respect to complication incidence (P = 0.275); however, after adjusting for other risk factors, the probability of complications tend to be higher for Group II (OR = 2.65; 95% confidence interval - 1.01-7.00; P = 0.049). Conclusions: On the basis of the results of our study, the probability of complications tends to be higher for delayed reconstructions, and it is demonstrated that obesity and smoking are risk factors for complications. Ultimately, these data may facilitate the provision of individualized risk information for shared medical decision-making.
Palavras-chave
breast reconstruction, conservative breast surgery, partial mastectomy reconstruction, oncoplastic surgery, mammaplasty, mastopexy, complications
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/22473
Referências
  1. Agarwal Tripti, 2002, Breast Dis, V16, P37
  2. Selber JC, 2006, ANN PLAS SURG, V56, P492, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000210180.72721.4a
  3. Fisher B, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V347, P1233, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa022152
  4. Clough KB, 2003, ANN SURG, V237, P26, DOI 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00005
  5. Anderson BO, 2005, LANCET ONCOL, V6, P145, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)01765-1
  6. Kaur N, 2005, ANN SURG ONCOL, V12, P539, DOI 10.1245/ASO.2005.12.046
  7. Clough KB, 1999, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V104, P409, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199908000-00014
  8. Kronowitz SJ, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, P1755, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000287130.77835.f6
  9. Veronesi U, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V347, P1227, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa020989
  10. Alderman AK, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P2265, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00015
  11. Rietjens M, 2007, BREAST, V16, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2007.01.008
  12. Cunningham BL, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V115, P1597, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000160695.33457.DB
  13. Kronowitz SJ, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V117, P1, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000194899.01875.d6
  14. DABBAH A, 1995, ANN PLAS SURG, V35, P337
  15. Munhoz AM, 2006, ANN PLAS SURG, V57, P502, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000233969.25031.cb
  16. Losken A, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V59, P235, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802ec6d1
  17. Munhoz AM, 2007, BREAST, V16, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2007.04.008
  18. O'Grady KF, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V115, P736, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000152428.43300.19
  19. Clough KB, 1998, ANN PLAS SURG, V41, P471, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199811000-00004
  20. Spear SL, 2003, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V111, P1102, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000046491.87997.40
  21. Losken A, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V124, P9, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10e5
  22. BERRINO P, 1987, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V79, P567, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198704000-00010
  23. BICKCHANDANI JP, 2007, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V60, P1050
  24. Chang E, 2004, AM J SURG, V187, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.002
  25. Chang LD, 1996, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V12, P467, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1006620
  26. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V58, P246, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000248108.52837.6c
  27. Hamdi M, 2007, CLIN PLAST SURG, V34, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2006.11.007
  28. Kroll SS, 1998, CLIN PLAST SURG, V25, P303
  29. Losken A, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P968, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200203000-00025
  30. Masetti R, 2006, BREAST J, V12, P174
  31. MUNHOZ AM, 2008, PARTIAL BREAST RECON, P374
  32. Munhoz AM, 2009, BREAST, V18, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2008.10.005
  33. Munhoz AM, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V117, P1091, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000202121.84583.0d
  34. Munhoz AM, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V121, P716, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000299295.74100.fa
  35. Padubidri AN, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V107, P350
  36. Slavin Sumner A, 2004, Semin Plast Surg, V18, P89, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-829043
  37. Stolier Alan, 2003, Breast J, V9, P269, DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09403.x

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04