Validation of a treatment algorithm for major depression in an older Brazilian sample

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MARTINS, Camila B.
MOSCOSO, Marco A. A.
STEFFENS, David C.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, v.28, n.6, p.647-653, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a modified version of the Duke Somatic Algorithm Treatment for Geriatric Depression (STAGED) in a Brazilian sample of older patients with major depression. Besides, we aimed to investigate possible baseline predictive factors for remission in this sample. Methods Sixty-seven depressed individuals were treated according to STAGED over 24 weeks in a prospective cohort design with follow-up. All patients had criteria for major depression and were at least 60 years of age at baseline enrollment. Results During this follow-up, 56 patients could be classified in remitted or not remitted group, 42.85% reached remission, and 57.14% did not reach remission. These results are even better than those found in the original study, probably due to the lower baseline depression severity of our sample. When baseline characteristics were compared between remitted and not remitted groups, scores of Mini Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) were the only variables with statistical significant difference (p<0.05) between groups. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to try to predict remission and statistical significance (p<0.05) was found only for baseline MMSE scores. It may mean that patients with mixed cognitive disorders and mood disorders have a worse course of depression. Conclusions This version of STAGED seems to be a useful strategy for treatment of depression in late life. Baseline general cognitive performance might be useful to predict remission of depression in older patients with mild to moderate depression. Further research with different population characteristics should be conducted in order to evaluate its usefulness and feasibility in different settings.
Palavras-chave
treatment algorithm, major depression and older patients, Brazilian sample, cognitive performance, response, remission, predictive factors
Referências
  1. ALEXOPOULOS GS, 1993, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V34, P141, DOI 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90383-O
  2. Avila R, 2009, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V21, P560, DOI 10.1017/S1041610209008928
  3. Bella R, 2010, GERONTOLOGY, V56, P298, DOI 10.1159/000272003
  4. Birkenhager TK, 2006, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V67, P1266
  5. Bottino CMC, 1999, ENTREVISTA ESTRUTURA
  6. Brommelhoff JA, 2009, PSYCHOL AGING, V24, P373, DOI 10.1037/a0015713
  7. Chapman Daniel P, 2008, Prev Chronic Dis, V5, pA22
  8. Folquitto JC, 2007, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V29, P350, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462006005000037
  9. FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIAT RES, V12, P189, DOI 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  10. Guy W, 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN
  11. HAMILTON M, 1960, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V23, P56, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
  12. Kok RM, 2009, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V119, P274, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01295.x
  13. Lehfeld H, 1997, ALZHEIMERS DIS AS S4, V11, P3944
  14. LINN BS, 1968, J AM GERIATR SOC, V16, P622
  15. MONTGOMERY SA, 1979, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V134, P382, DOI 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
  16. Mulsant BH, 2001, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V16, P585, DOI 10.1002/gps.465
  17. Papazacharias A, 2010, PSYCHIAT DANUB, V22, pS108
  18. ROTH M, 1986, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V149, P698, DOI 10.1192/bjp.149.6.698
  19. Schweitzer I, 2002, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V17, P997, DOI 10.1002/gps.525
  20. Steffens David C, 2002, Psychopharmacol Bull, V36, P58
  21. Stoppe A, 2006, J ECT, V22, P92, DOI 10.1097/00124509-200606000-00003
  22. Taylor WD, 2003, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V60, P1090, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1090
  23. Trivedi MH, 2004, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V61, P669, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.61.7.669
  24. VANOJEN R, 1995, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V166, P316, DOI 10.1192/bjp.166.3.316
  25. van Reekum R, 1999, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V7, P151