Impulsivity and seizure frequency, but not cognitive deficits, impact social adjustment in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
44
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
EPILEPSIA, v.54, n.5, p.866-870, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose Despite growing evidence on the occurrence of poor psychosocial adjustment, to the moment there is no formal assessment of social adjustment (SA) using a validated instrument developed and standardized for this purpose in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). We aimed to: (1) verify social adjustment in patients with JME with an objective scale and; (2) identify whether clinical variables, impulsiveness, and neuropsychological profile are associated with worse social adjustment. Methods We prospectively evaluated 42 patients with an unequivocal diagnosis of JME and 42 controls. The inclusion criteria for patients and controls included age range from 16 to 40years and an estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) ranging from 85 to 110. One trained neuropsychologist administered the scales and tests in a standard sequence. Social Adjustment was evaluated by The Self-Report Social Adjustment Scale (Weissman & Bothwell, ), a 42-item scale, measuring performance in seven major areas: work; social and leisure activities; relationship with extended family; marital role as a spouse; parental role; membership in the family unit; and economic adequacy. Impulsivity was assessed by using the Temperament and Character Inventory (Cloninger, ). Patients with JME and control subjects were evaluated with a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests evaluating executive and memory functions. We evaluated the age at onset; time from onset to seizure control with antiepileptic drugs (duration of epilepsy); seizure control; frequency of myoclonic seizures; frequency of generalized tonicclonic GTC seizures; frequency of absence seizures; family history of epilepsy; family history of psychiatric disorders; and personal history of psychiatric disorders. Key Findings The score on Global Social Adjustment was worse than controls (p=0.001), especially on the factors: Work (p=0.032); Extended Family (p=0.005). Higher Novelty Seeking (NS) scores were significantly correlated with worse on Global (p=0.002); Work (p=0.001) and Leisure (p=0.003). There was no correlation between cognitive performance and Social Adjustment Scale (SAS) factors. Higher seizure frequencymyoclonic (p=0.005) and GTC (p=0.035)were correlated with higher scores on factor Work of SAS. Significance Our findings suggest that patients with JME have worse social adjustment in two relevant aspects of their liveswork and familiar relationship. In this series of patients with JME, higher seizure frequency and impulsive traits, but not cognitive performance, were correlated with worse social adjustment.
Palavras-chave
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, Neuropsychologic tests, Impulse control, Social adjustment
Referências
  1. Baker GA, 1998, EPILEPSY RES, V30, P231, DOI 10.1016/S0920-1211(98)00010-2
  2. Boylan LS, 2004, NEUROLOGY, V62, P258
  3. Choi-Kwon S, 2003, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V108, P428, DOI 10.1046/j.1600-0404.2003.00151.x
  4. CLONINGER CR, 1993, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V50, P975
  5. Cloninger CR, 2000, J PERS DISORD, V14, P99
  6. Cornaggia CM, 2007, SEIZURE-EUR J EPILEP, V16, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.006
  7. CRAMER JA, 1994, NEUROL CLIN, V12, P1
  8. de Araújo Filho Gerardo Maria, 2007, Epilepsy Behav, V10, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.01.016
  9. Facure N O, 1992, Arq Neuropsiquiatr, V50, P486
  10. Gaitatzis A, 2004, EPILEPSIA, V45, P1613, DOI 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.17504.x
  11. Gaitatzis A, 2004, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V110, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00324.x
  12. Gelisse P, 2001, REV NEUROL-FRANCE, V157, P297
  13. Giovagnoli AR, 2000, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V101, P295, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.90257a.x
  14. Gois J, 2011, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V20, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.033
  15. Gorenstein C, 2002, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V69, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00300-7
  16. Green MF, 1996, AM J PSYCHIAT, V48, P173
  17. Heaton RK, 1981, WISCONSIN CARD SORTI
  18. Hommet C, 2006, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V30, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.004
  19. ILAE, 1989, EPILEPSIA, V30, P389
  20. Jacoby A, 1996, EPILEPSIA, V37, P148, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00006.x
  21. Janz D, 1957, DTSCH Z NERVENHEILK, V176, P346
  22. Kwan P, 2009, EPILEPSIA, V50, P1059, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01938.x
  23. LEVIN R, 1988, EPILEPSIA, V29, P805, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1988.tb04238.x
  24. Lezak MD, 2005, NEUROPYCHOLOGICAL AS
  25. Loring DW, 2004, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V5, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.yebech.2004.08.019
  26. Moschetta S, 2011, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V21, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.03.036
  27. Moschetta SP, 2012, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V25, P682, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.10.002
  28. Pascalicchio TF, 2007, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V10, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.11.012
  29. PERRINE K, 1995, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V52, P997
  30. Piazzini A, 2008, EPILEPSIA, V49, P657, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01482.x
  31. Salgado PCB, 2002, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V60, P442, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2002000300019
  32. Sonmez F, 2004, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V5, P329, DOI 10.1016/j..yebeh.2004.01.007
  33. Specht U, 2001, NEED COMPREHENSIVE C
  34. Spreen O, 1991, COMPENDIUM NEUROPSYC
  35. Swartz BE, 1996, NEUROLOGY, V47, P1203
  36. Wechsler D, 1999, WECHSLER ABBREVIATED
  37. Weinberger D R, 1992, Clin Neuropharmacol, V15 Suppl 1 Pt A, p568A
  38. WEISSMAN MM, 1976, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, P1111
  39. Woodward E S, 1982, J Neurosurg Nurs, V14, P166
  40. World Health Organization, 1990, COMP INT DIAGN INT
  41. American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT