Survey of Trachoma within School Students in the State of Roraima, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2011
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MEDINA, Norma Helen
LOPES, Maria de Fatima
DURKIN, Shane R.
CARDOSO, Maria Regina A.
KOIZUMI, Ines K.
BROCK, Karen Ruth
FREITAS, Helen Selma de Abreu
MAURICIO, Maria Angela
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
OPHTHALMOLOGY, v.118, n.10, p.1938-1943, 2011
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: Trachoma, a blinding conjunctivitis, is the result of repeated infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. There are no recent data for the state of Roraima, Brazil, where it was thought that trachoma no longer existed. These data are derived from school children sampled in this state, with additional data collected from the contacts of children with trachoma. Design: A population-based cross-sectional study with random sampling of students in grades 1 through 4 of all public schools within municipalities where the human development index was less than the national average in 2003. The sample was stratified according to population size. Participants: A sample size of 7200 was determined and a total of 6986 (93%) students were examined, along with an additional 2152 contacts. Methods: All students were examined for trachoma according to World Health Organization criteria. Demographic data and contact information also was collected. The family and school contacts of students with trachoma then were located and examined. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence and grade of trachoma, age, gender, race, and municipality location. Results: The overall prevalence of trachoma was 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7%-5.3%), but there were municipalities within the state where the prevalence of inflammatory trachoma was more than 10%. The prevalence was greater in rural areas (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.7%-6.0%) compared with urban areas (3.9%; 95% CI, 2.9%-4.9%). Living in indigenous communities was associated with trachoma (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9-2.6). An additional 2152 contacts were examined, and the overall trachoma prevalence was 9.3% (95% CI, 8.1-10.5). Conclusions: Trachoma continues to exist in Roraima, Brazil, where there are municipalities with a significant prevalence of disease. The indigenous population is highly mobile, crossing state and international borders, raising the possibility of trachoma in neighboring countries. Trachoma prevalence among the contacts of students with trachoma was higher than the school population, highlighting the importance of contact tracing. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1938-1943 (C) 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Alves APX, 2002, OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOL, V9, P29
  2. THYLEFORS B, 1987, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V65, P477
  3. Resnikoff S, 2004, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V82, P844
  4. Caligaris LSA, 2006, OPHTHAL EPIDEMIOL, V13, P365, DOI 10.1080/09286580601013078
  5. Carvalho RC, 1997, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V60, P243
  6. Couto Junior AS, 1997, REV BRAS OFTALMOL, V56, P515
  7. Cruz AAV, 2008, OPHTHAL EPIDEMIOL, V15, P272, DOI 10.1080/09286580802080090
  8. DAWSON CR, 1976, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V60, P245, DOI 10.1136/bjo.60.4.245
  9. DAWSON CR, 1981, GUIA PRATICA LUCHA T, V1, P68
  10. De Freitas C A, 1976, Rev Bras Malariol Doencas Trop, V28, P227
  11. de Freitas C A, 1977, Rev Bras Malariol Doencas Trop, V29, P33
  12. Garrido C, 1999, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V62, P132
  13. GRAYSTON JT, 1985, REV INFECT DIS, V7, P717
  14. *INEP, SCH CENS 1 4 GRAD
  15. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, CENS DEM 2000
  16. Koizumi IK, 2005, REV SAUDE PUBL, V39, P937, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102005000600011, 10.1590/s0034-89102005000600011]
  17. Lopes MFC, 2008, THESIS U FEDERAL BAH
  18. LUNA EJA, 1992, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V21, P169, DOI 10.1093/ije/21.1.169
  19. Maccallan A F, 1931, Br J Ophthalmol, V15, P369, DOI 10.1136/bjo.15.7.369
  20. Medina NH, 1996, REV SAUDE PUBL, V30, P135
  21. MEDINA NH, 1992, TROP MED PARASITOL, V43, P121
  22. Paula JS, 2002, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V35, P1153, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2002001000007
  23. *PROGR NAC UN DES, HUM DEV REP BRAZ
  24. Vieira J B, 1998, Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, V31 Suppl 2, P121
  25. *WHO, 2003, 2 GLOB SCI M TRACH G