A Comparative Study of Full-Thickness Blepharotomy Versus Transconjunctival Eyelid Lengthening in the Correction of Upper Eyelid Retraction in Graves' Orbitopathy

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_GONCALVES_A_Comparative_Study_of_FullThickness_Blepharotomy_Versus_Transconjunctival_2018.PDF (1.12 MB)
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Editora
SPRINGER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, v.42, n.1, p.215-223, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The study was designed to compare the outcome of full-thickness blepharotomy and transconjunctival eyelid lengthening in the correction of upper eyelid retraction (UER) in patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO). This is a prospective randomized interventional study. Following ophthalmic examination, determination of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and photography, 27 patients with UER were randomly assigned to either graded full-thickness blepharotomy (G1) or transconjunctival Muller muscle recession and graded disinsertion of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle (G2). Six months later, patients were reevaluated. Digital images were analyzed with the assistance of customized software. A standardized ""normal range"" of upper eyelid height and contour was calculated based on healthy controls. The outcome of the two groups was compared. Forty-seven eyelids of 27 patients (19 female) with UER were included. Twenty-seven eyelids (15 patients) were allocated to G1 and 20 eyelids (12 patients) to G2. On average, surgery lasted 37.46 +/- 5.73 min in G1 and 32.70 +/- 8.39 min in G2. Based on the margin reflex distance, 93% of the eyelids in G1 and 85% in G2 were within the normal range after surgery. The corresponding figures for lid contour were 63 and 55%. Both groups displayed significant improvement in OSDI scores. No significant difference was observed in the overall comparison. The two surgical techniques were equally effective in the treatment of UER from GO. Postoperative contour outcomes were considerably worse in patients with severe UER than in patients with mild or moderate UER, regardless of group.
Palavras-chave
Upper eyelid retraction, Eyelid retraction, Graves' orbitopathy, Lid surgery
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/25607
Referências
  1. Bartalena L, 2000, ENDOCR REV, V21, P168, DOI 10.1210/er.21.2.168
  2. Bartley GB, 1996, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V121, P284, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70276-4
  3. BARTLEY GB, 1995, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V119, P792, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72787-4
  4. Ben Simon GJ, 2005, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V140, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.034
  5. CEISLER EJ, 1995, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V102, P483
  6. Chang EL, 2012, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V28, P229, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182523b50
  7. Cho RI, 2011, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V27, P436, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182232465
  8. Costa PG, 2009, EYE, V23, P767, DOI 10.1038/eye.2008.165
  9. Cruz AAV, 2003, OPHTHALMIC PLAST REC, V19, P212, DOI 10.1097/01.IOP.0000064993.78887.93
  10. Dougherty BE, 2011, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V52, P8630, DOI 10.1167/iovs.11-8027
  11. Elner Victor M, 2003, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V101, P67
  12. Elner VM, 2004, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V122, P55, DOI 10.1001/archopht.122.1.55
  13. Elner VM, 2003, T AM OPHTHALMOL SOC, V101
  14. FELDON SE, 1990, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V74, P484, DOI 10.1136/bjo.74.8.484
  15. Fenton S, 2002, Orbit, V21, P289, DOI 10.1076/orbi.21.4.289.8557
  16. George J-L, 2002, Orbit, V21, P19, DOI 10.1076/orbi.21.1.19.2602
  17. Goldberg RA, 2008, THYROID, V18, P989, DOI 10.1089/thy.2008.0033
  18. HENDERSON JW, 1965, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V74, P205, DOI 10.1001/archopht.1965.00970040207015
  19. Hintschich C, 2005, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V89, P413, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2004.052852
  20. Ivekovic R, 2005, COLLEGIUM ANTROPOL, V29, P33
  21. Kazim M, 2011, CURR OPIN OPHTHALMOL, V22, P391, DOI 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283499433
  22. Kikkawa Don O, 2010, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V108, P46
  23. Kim TH, 2010, TRIALS, V11, DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-11-107
  24. LIU D, 1993, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V24, P323
  25. Looi ALG, 2006, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V22, P434, DOI 10.1097/01.iop.0000240821.74843.7c
  26. Mancini R, 2011, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V27, P1, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181c2a16d
  27. McCracken MS, 2008, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V45, P220, DOI 10.3928/01913913-20080701-11
  28. Milbratz GH, 2012, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V119, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.039
  29. OLIVER JM, 1995, EYE, V9, P467
  30. Papageorgiou KI, 2012, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V28, P419, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e318263c56e
  31. Prigol AM, 2012, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V75, P24, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27492012000100005
  32. PUTTERMAN AM, 1972, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V87, P401
  33. Ribeiro SFT, 2012, OPHTHAL PLAST RECONS, V28, P429, DOI 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182696532
  34. Schaefer Daniel P, 2007, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V105, P481
  35. Schiffman RM, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P615
  36. SKINNER SW, 1969, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V67, P764, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(69)91007-1
  37. Cruz AAV, 2013, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V58, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.02.007
  38. Versura P, 2010, CURR OPIN ALLERGY CL, V10, P486, DOI 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833e1749
  39. WALDSTEIN SS, 1964, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V189, P609

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/33