Carbonaceous particulate matter on the lung surface from adults living in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Autores
WHITEHOUSE, Abigail
HABERMANN, Mateus
GRIGG, Jonathan
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.12, n.11, article ID e0188237, 10p, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Accumulation of carbonaceous particulate matter (PM) in the lung is associated with chronic disease. The amount of carbonaceous PM in airway macrophages is reported to be associated with exposure to both fossil fuel PM and cigarette smoke. However, the contribution of these exposures to carbonaceous PM at the lung surface is unclear. Objectives We therefore sought to identify the exposures associated with lung surface in long-term residents of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Methods Lung surface carbon were analyzed in 72 autopsy specimens by image analysis. Smoking history, measured PM10 nearest to the home, distance to main road, and distance-weighted traffic density were used as exposure variables. Data are summarized as median (IQR), and compared by Mann Whitney Test, with correlations done by Spearman's correlation. Results There was no association between lung surface and age or gender. There was no statistically significant association in lung surface between smokers and non-smokers 6.74 cm(2) (3.47 to 10.02) versus 5.20cm(2) (2.29 to 7.54), and there was no significant association between lung surface carbon and exposure to environmental PM and markers of traffic exposure. Conclusion We did not find a statistically significant association between lung surface and smokers and non-smokers, and no statistically significant association between lung surface carbon and environmental exposure variables. These results suggest that lung surface carbon in long-term residents of Sao Paulo may predominately be from environmental PM, but the most appropriate environmental exposure marker remains unclear.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Arnold C., 2015, ENV HLTH PERSPECT, V124, pA13
  2. Bai Y, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V74, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.010
  3. Belli AJ, 2016, ENVIRON RES, V150, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.025
  4. Bennett WD, 1996, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V153, P1641, DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630615
  5. Brauer M, 2001, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V109, P1039, DOI 10.2307/3454959
  6. Bunn HJ, 2001, THORAX, V56, P932, DOI 10.1136/thorax.56.12.932
  7. CETESB, 2015, QUALIDADE AR ESTADO
  8. Finch GL, 2002, INHAL TOXICOL, V14, P1017, DOI 10.1080/08958370290084764
  9. Gerber A, 2015, J OCCUP MED TOXICOL, V10, DOI 10.1186/s12995-015-0047-8
  10. Habermann M, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0113900
  11. Jacobs L, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016200
  12. Kato A, 2003, INHAL TOXICOL, V15, P799, DOI 10.1080/08958370390217855
  13. Kulkarni N, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P21, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa052972
  14. Nwokoro C, 2012, EUR RESPIR J, V40, P1091, DOI 10.1183/09031936.00195711
  15. Pearson RL, 2000, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V50, P175, DOI 10.1080/10473289.2000.10463998
  16. PEPELKO WE, 1980, J ENVIRON PATHOL TOX, V4, P449
  17. Pinkerton K. E., 2000, ENV HLTH PERSPECTIVE
  18. Pratt P C, 1971, CHEST, V59, pS39
  19. Saxena RK, 2011, J TOXICOL ENV HEAL A, V74, P706, DOI 10.1080/15287394.2011.556059
  20. WALLACE WAH, 1992, THORAX, V47, P437, DOI 10.1136/thx.47.6.437
  21. WHO, 2006, WHO AIR QUAL GUID PA
  22. You R, 2015, ELIFE, V4, DOI 10.7554/eLife.09623
  23. [Anonymous], 2016, EVIDENCE SUBMITTED R