What does the Internet teach the obstetric patient about labor analgesia?
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MURPHY, Caitriona
CHINAPPA, Vinod
MARGARIDO, Clarita B.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, v.68, n.3, p.254-259, 2018
Resumo
Background and objectives: It has been observed a general public increased search on the Internet for health information, including Anesthesiology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the information available to the lay person in Portuguese on the internet about labor analgesia for the Brazilian population. Method: Using the term ""labor anesthesia"", the first 20 sites found on Google in November 2014 were evaluated by two resident physicians and classified as medical and non-medical. Legibility and Design - accessibility, reliability and navigability-were compared using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRESH) and Minervation validation tool for healthcare websites (LIDA) tools. The websites' content was confronted with that of the medical literature. Results: Medical and non-medical websites were considered difficult to read according to FRESH. Regarding the design, there was no difference between groups regarding navigability, however, accessibility was considered superior in non-medical websites (p = 0.042); while reliability was higher in medical websites (p = 0.019). Conclusions: With the increased search for health information on the Internet and concern about improving the quality of childbirth care, it is fundamental that the content available to the layperson about labor analgesia is of quality and well understood. This study demonstrated that both medical and non-medical websites are difficult to read and that non-medical websites are more accessible while the medical ones are more accurate. (C) 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia.
Palavras-chave
Internet, Patient information, Analgesia, obstetric
Referências
- [Anonymous], 2015, WRITE EASY TO READ H
- [Anonymous], 2015, HEATLH LITERACY ONLI
- Biblioteca Virtual em Saude, 2015, BIBL VIRT SAUD
- De Oliveira GS, 2015, J CLIN ANESTH, V27, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.02.005
- Eysenbach G, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P2691, DOI 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691
- Martins TBF, 1996, READABILITY FORMULAS
- Moretti FA, 2012, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V58, P650, DOI 10.1590/S0104-42302012000600008
- Murphy C, AN CAS M
- Patel SK, 2015, ANESTH ANALG, V121, P1295, DOI 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000888
- Patel U, 2011, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V139, pe103
- D'Gregorio RP, 2010, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V111, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.002
- Pimenta RP, 2015, THESIS FIOCRUZ RO DE
- Reynolds F, 2010, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V24, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.11.003
- Roshan A, 2008, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V90, P601, DOI 10.1308/003588408X318129
- San Norberto EM, 2011, REV ESP CARDIOL, V64, P869, DOI 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.04.012
- Segal S., 2009, ASA REFRESHER COURSE, P189
- Silva EV, 2007, REV ESPACO SAUDE, V8, P39
- Soobrah R, 2012, COLORECTAL DIS, V14, pe90, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02792.x
- Tavare AN, 2012, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V35, P1355, DOI 10.1007/s00270-012-0345-9
- Wong C., 2011, ASA REFRESHER COURSE, P156