Cri du Chat syndrome: Characteristics of 73 Brazilian patients

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Editora
WILEY
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MELLO, C. B.
NUNES-VACA, E. C.
BENEDETTO, L. M.
KHOURY, R. B. F.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, v.62, n.6, p.467-473, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BackgroundCri du Chat syndrome (CdCS) is a genetic syndrome caused by deletions in the short arm of chromosome 5. Although the main clinical features of CdCS are well known, the neurocognitive and behavioural characteristics of the phenotype are rarely described in detail in the literature. In this study, we analysed the main phenotypic features of CdCS from a parental perspective. MethodA questionnaire was sent to 700 Brazilian families that were registered in the Brazilian Association of CdCS. The questions involved specific domains of CdCS, such as pregnancy and birth conditions, recurrence of the disease in the family, current major health problems, and aspects of cognitive development. ResultsIn total, 73 questionnaires were completed: 44 females and 29 males, ranging from 9.5months old to 40years old (mean=13.8 years; median=12 years). Most of the parents noticed the typical cat-like cry at birth (94.4%). The age at diagnosis of CdCS ranged from the time of birth to 180months (mean=14months; median=6months), while one case was diagnosed during pregnancy. In all of the cases, the diagnosis of CdCS was made by G-banding karyotype analysis. In 66.2% of the cases, the parents underwent cytogenetic investigation. A total of 52.1% of the parents answered that they did not remember what the recurrence risk of CdCS was in their family. The main health problems that were reported were as follows: swallowing problems (80.3%), feeding problems (80.3%), congenital heart disease (31.5%), spine abnormalities (28.8%), and neurological symptoms (20.5%), including seizures (11%). The behavioural problems that were reported were as follows: aggressive behaviour, stereotypies, anxiety, phobias, and genital manipulation/masturbation. Neurodevelopmental delay was reported in all of the cases. Independent walking was achieved in 72.2% of the patients. Approximately 50% of the patients never presented expressive language, and most of the patients are dependent on others for their daily activities. ConclusionsThe questionnaire was a pioneer initiative in the CdCS support group, and the answers used in this study can improve the health care assistance to these patients because they focus attention on the demands from a parental perspective. In addition, nearly half of the families stated that they did not remember information regarding recurrence risk, which reinforces the importance of genetic counselling follow-up and the need for the expansion of genetic services in Brazil
Palavras-chave
chromosomal, Cri du Chat syndrome, genetics, parental, questionnaire
Referências
  1. Cornish KM, 1996, ARCH DIS CHILD, V75, P448, DOI 10.1136/adc.75.5.448
  2. Elmakky A, 2014, EUR J MED GENET, V57, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.02.005
  3. Erlenkamp S, 2010, J COMMUN DISORD, V43, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.03.002
  4. Gu HG, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081759
  5. Kristoffersen KE, 2014, CLIN LINGUIST PHONET, V28, P769, DOI 10.3109/02699206.2014.904442
  6. LEJEUNE J, 1963, CR HEBD ACAD SCI, V257, P3098
  7. Mainardi PC, 2006, ORPHANET J RARE DIS, V1, DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-1-33
  8. Mainardi PC, 2006, EUR J MED GENET, V49, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.12.004
  9. Marinescu RC, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V94, P153, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000911)94:2<153::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-#
  10. Ministerio da Saude Brasil, 2014, POL NAC AT INT PESS
  11. Moss J, 2013, AJIDD-AM J INTELLECT, V118, P262, DOI 10.1352/1944-7558-118.4.262
  12. Moss JF, 2008, AM J MENT RETARD, V113, P278, DOI 10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[278:POASPI]2.0.CO;2
  13. NIEBUHR E, 1978, HUM GENET, V42, P143, DOI 10.1007/BF00283634
  14. Rodriguez-Caballero A, 2010, MED ORAL PATOL ORAL, V15, pE473, DOI 10.4317/medoral.15.e473
  15. Simmons AD, 1997, GENOME RES, V7, P118, DOI 10.1101/gr.7.2.118
  16. Teixeira MCTV, 2011, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V55, P132, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01377.x
  17. WILKINS LE, 1983, J PEDIATR-US, V102, P528, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80179-6