Supracricoid Laryngectomy: The Function of the Remaining Arytenoid in Voice and Swallowing

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BUZANELI_Supracricoid_Laryngectomy_The_Function_of_the_Remaining_Arytenoid_2018.PDF (203.6 KB)
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Editora
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI
Indexadores
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, v.22, n.3, p.303-312, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction Supracricoid laryngectomy still has selected indications; there are few studies in the literature, and the case series are limited, a fact that stimulates the development of new studies to further elucidate the structural and functional aspects of the procedure. Objective To assess voice and deglutition parameters according to the number of preserved arytenoids. Methods Eleven patients who underwent subtotal laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy were evaluated by laryngeal nasofibroscopy, videofluoroscopy, and auditory-perceptual, acoustic, and voice pleasantness analyses, after resuming oral feeding. Results Functional abnormalities were detected in two out of the three patients who underwent arytenoidectomy, and in six patients from the remainder of the sample. Almost half of the sample presented silent laryngeal penetration and/or vallecular/hypopharyngeal stasis on the videofluoroscopy. The mean voice analysis scores indicated moderate vocal deviation, roughness and breathiness; severe strain and loudness deviation; shorter maximum phonation time; the presence of noise; and high third and fourth formant values. The voices were rated as unpleasant. There was no difference in the number and functionality of the remaining arytenoids as prognostic factors for deglutition; however, in the qualitative analysis, favorable voice and deglutition outcomes were more common among patients who did not undergo arytenoidectomy and had normal functional conditions. Conclusion The number and functionality of the preserved arytenoids were not found to be prognostic factors for favorable deglutition efficiency outcomes. However, the qualitative analysis showed that the preservation of both arytenoids and the absence of functional abnormalities were associated with more satisfactory voice and deglutition patterns.
Palavras-chave
head and neck neoplasms, laryngectomy, voice, deglutition, speech therapy
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/28112
Referências
  1. Allegra E, 2011, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V145, P789, DOI 10.1177/0194599811416438
  2. American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System (NOMS), 1998, AD SPEECH LANG PATH
  3. Behlau M., 2004, REV SOC BRAS FONOAUD, V9, P187
  4. Bron L, 2002, LARYNGOSCOPE, V112, P1289, DOI 10.1097/00005537-200207000-00027
  5. Crosetti E, 2014, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V34, P19
  6. Dworkin JP, 2003, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V129, P311, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)01314-7
  7. Fouquet Marina Lang, 2012, Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol., V17, P346, DOI 10.1590/S1516-80342012000300018
  8. Goncalves AJ, 2010, AURIS NASUS LARYNX, V37, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2009.04.015
  9. Kruk-Zagajewska A, 1995, Otolaryngol Pol, V49, P15
  10. Lewin JS, 2008, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V30, P559, DOI 10.1002/hed.20738
  11. Logemann JA, 1998, EVALUATION TREATMENT
  12. Makeieff M, 2007, J VOICE, V21, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.03.001
  13. Marioni G, 2004, AM J OTOLARYNG, V25, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2003.11.008
  14. Nakayama M, 2016, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V46, P642, DOI 10.1093/jjco/hyw044
  15. Naudo P, 1998, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V118, P124, DOI 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70388-2
  16. Nemr K, 2012, J VOICE, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005
  17. Nemr Nair Katia, 2007, Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol., V73, P151, DOI 10.1590/S0034-72992007000200002
  18. Ozturk K, 2016, ORL J OTO-RHINO-LARY, V78, P86, DOI 10.1159/000444499
  19. Park JO, 2011, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V137, P1124, DOI 10.1001/archoto.2011.182
  20. Piquet J J, 1974, Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, V91, P681
  21. Portas Juliana Godoy, 2009, Ear Nose Throat J, V88, pE23
  22. Prado P RP, 2012, REV BRAS CIR CABECA, V41, P124
  23. PRESSMAN J J, 1956, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, V65, P766
  24. Saito K, 2009, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V140, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.036
  25. Schindler A, 2006, AM J OTOLARYNG, V27, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.01.010
  26. Schindler A, 2016, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V273, P3459, DOI 10.1007/s00405-015-3822-3
  27. So YK, 2009, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V141, P770, DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.028
  28. SUNDBERG Johan, 2015, CIENCIA VOZ FATOS VO
  29. Svicero M AF, 2012, THESIS
  30. Timon CI, 2010, J VOICE, V24, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.02.003
  31. Torrejano G, 2009, J VOICE, V23, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.08.005
  32. Yamasaki R, 2017, J VOICE, V31, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.01.004
  33. Zacharek MA, 2001, LARYNGOSCOPE, V111, P1558, DOI 10.1097/00005537-200109000-00012

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/28
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/34