MENISCAL REPAIR RESULTS COMPARING MRI, ARTHRO-MRI, AND ARTHRO-CT

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.26, n.3, p.166-169, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To clinically and radiologically evaluate patients who received meniscal suture using the outside-in technique, comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), arthro-magnetic resonance imaging (arthro-MRI), and arthro-computed tomography (arthro-CT) to evaluate the healing of meniscal sutures. Methods: We evaluated eight patients with an average follow-up of 15 months. The evaluation analyzed clinical parameters using the Lysholm and IKDC scores as well as MRI, arthro-MRI, and arthro-CT imaging. Results: At the end of the follow-up period, mean Lysholm score was 89.5 and mean IKDC score was 78.6. In the MRI, signs of meniscal healing were observed in 50% of the cases. The arthro-MRI and arthro-CT showed signs of healing in 75% of cases. There was a positive correlation between arthro-MRI and arthro-CT results in all the cases studied (kappa correlation index=1). Conclusion: Meniscal suture using the outside-in technique presented good or excellent results in 87.5% of our patients. The arthro-CT and arthro-MRI showed the same level of accuracy in detecting healing of the sutured region of the meniscus.
Palavras-chave
Meniscus, Knee, Magnetic resonance imaging, Tomography
Referências
  1. Annandale T, 1885, Br Med J, V1, P779
  2. ARNOCZKY SP, 1982, AM J SPORT MED, V10, P90, DOI 10.1177/036354658201000205
  3. Asahina S, 1996, ARTHROSCOPY, V12, P541, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90191-7
  4. BRONSTEIN R, 1992, ORTHOPEDICS, V15, P149
  5. CANNON WD, 1992, AM J SPORT MED, V20, P176, DOI 10.1177/036354659202000214
  6. CANNON WD, 1994, AAOS INSTR COURS LEC, V43, P77
  7. Davis Kirkland W, 2002, Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, V6, P35, DOI 10.1055/s-2002-23162
  8. FAIRBANK TJ, 1948, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V30, P664
  9. FARLEY TE, 1991, RADIOLOGY, V180, P517, DOI 10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068321
  10. Gill SS, 2002, ARTHROSCOPY, V18, P569, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.29897
  11. HANKS GA, 1990, AM J SPORT MED, V18, P606, DOI 10.1177/036354659001800609
  12. Horibe S, 1996, ARTHROSCOPY, V12, P150, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90003-1
  13. Insall JN, 2001, SURG KNEE, V1, P521
  14. Irrgang JJ, 2001, AM J SPORT MED, V29, P600, DOI 10.1177/03635465010290051301
  15. KING D, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P4
  16. LYSHOLM J, 1982, AM J SPORT MED, V10, P150, DOI 10.1177/036354658201000306
  17. Perdue PS, 1996, ARTHROSCOPY, V12, P694, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90172-3
  18. Ritchie JR, 1998, AM J SPORT MED, V26, P278, DOI 10.1177/03635465980260022001
  19. Steenbrugge F, 2002, KNEE, V9, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00017-0
  20. STONE R G, 1990, Arthroscopy, V6, P73, DOI 10.1016/0749-8063(90)90001-T
  21. WARREN RF, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P55