Neoliberal meritocracy and financial capitalism: consequences for social protection and health

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
19
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ABRASCO
Autores
SILVA, Hudson Pacifico da
Citação
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, v.23, n.7, p.2107-2117, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
There is inherent tension between the idea of health as a social right and of health as a private good. From the latter perspective, healthcare provision is brought closer to the logic of ownership, where access depends on ability to pay. The prioritization of markets (over governments), economic incentives (over social or cultural norms), and entrepreneurship (over collective or community action), one of the hallmarks of neoliberalism, constitutes a project to dismantle the welfare state, defined as a set of policy mechanisms designed to meet collective needs. This article examines the above process and its consequences for social protection and health by reflecting upon two phenomena that threaten the principle of health as a social right: neoliberal ideas and policies; and financial capitalism. We argue that the common good must be defended or insulated from the negative effects of financial capitalism and from the erosion and fragmentation of public institutions and social protection systems caused by neoliberalism.
Palavras-chave
Capitalism, Commodification, Public policy, Public health
Referências
  1. Bahia L, 2016, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V32, DOI 10.1590/0102-311X00154015
  2. Cahill D, 2017, NEOLIBERALISM KEY CO
  3. CASTEL Robert, 2010, METAMORFOSES QUESTAO
  4. Crotty J., 2002, 44 PERI
  5. Curran T, 2017, PSYCHOL BULL, DOI [10. 1037/bul0000138, DOI 10.1037/BUL0000138]
  6. DARDOT Pierre, 2016, NOVA RAZAO MUNDO ENS
  7. Fine B., 2017, UNIVERSAL HLTH CARE, P29
  8. Hiratuka C, 2016, BLUCHER P, V3
  9. International Labor Organization (ILO), 2017, WORLD SOC PROT REP 2
  10. Jones DS, 2012, MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE: HAYEK, FRIEDMAN, AND THE BIRTH OF NEOLIBERAL POLITICS, P1
  11. Klein N, 2007, SHOCK DOCTRINE RISE
  12. Lazonick W, 2000, ECON SOC, V29, P13, DOI 10.1080/030851400360541
  13. Peters C., 1982, WASHINGTON POST
  14. Rodrik D., 2017, BOSTON REV
  15. Saad-Filho A., 2010, POLITICAL EC GLOBAL, P89
  16. Schrecker T, 2015, POLITICS MAKES US SI
  17. Sennett R., 2003, CORROSAO CARATER CON
  18. Verhaeghe P., 2014, WHAT ME STRUGGLE IDE
  19. Viana ALD, 2007, DIVULG SAUDE DEBATE, V37, P7
  20. Viana ALD, 2015, SEGMENTOS INSTITUCIO
  21. Viana ALD, 2005, PROTECAO SOCIAL DILE, P15
  22. World Health Organization (WHO), 2017, WORLD HLTH STAT 2007