Ultra-processing. An odd 'appraisal'

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
28
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Editora
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MONTEIRO, Carlos A.
CANNON, Geoffrey
MOUBARAC, Jean-Claude
LOUZADA, Maria Laura C.
JAIME, Patricia C.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, v.21, n.3, p.497-501, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
It is now generally agreed that the impact of the current nature, purpose and extent of food processing on human well-being, health and disease needs to be better understood and explained, in order to improve public health. The special issue of Public Health Nutrition devoted to the concept of ultra-processing of food, and the NOVA classification of which ultra-processed foods are one category, is a great step forward in this work. Coincidentally, a polemical 'critical appraisal' of ultra-processing was recently published in another journal. Debate and discussion are an essential part of the scientific endeavour. In this commentary, we correct inaccurate statements made about NOVA in the 'appraisal,' rebut points raised, and discuss the larger issue of scientific responsibility for publishing opposing views on controversial topics.
Palavras-chave
Food processing, Ultra-processed food, NOVA, Diet quality, Non-communicable diseases
Referências
  1. Brazilian Ministry of Health, 2014, DIET GUID BRAZ POP
  2. Louzada MLD, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006132
  3. Mendonca RD, 2017, AM J HYPERTENS, V30, P358, DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpw137
  4. Mendonca RD, 2016, AM J CLIN NUTR, V104, P1433, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Food Climate Research Network, 2016, DEV NAT HLTH SUST DI
  6. Gibney MJ, 2017, AM J CLIN NUTR, V106, P717, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.117.160440
  7. International Tobacco Control Project, 2012, ITC UR NAT REP FIND
  8. Jacobs A., 2017, NY TIMES
  9. Julia C, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V21, P27, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017001367
  10. Katz DL, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182351
  11. Louzada MLC, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, P45, DOI [http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006211, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006211]
  12. Ministerio de Salud, 2016, GUIA AL POBL UR
  13. Monteiro CA, 2009, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V12, P729, DOI 10.1017/S1368980009005291
  14. Monteiro CA, 2018, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V21, P5, DOI 10.1017/S1368980017000234
  15. Monteiro CA, 2015, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V18, P2311, DOI 10.1017/S1368980015002165
  16. Moodie R, 2013, LANCET, V381, P670, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62089-3
  17. Moubarac JC, 2017, APPETITE, V108, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006
  18. Moubarac JC, 2013, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, P845, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2013.796401
  19. Mozaffarian D, 2010, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V304, P681, DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.1116
  20. Pan American Health Organization of the World Health Organization, 2016, NUTR PROF MOD
  21. Pan American Health Organization of the World Health Organization, 2015, ULTR FOOD DRINK PROD
  22. Steele EM, 2017, NUTRIENTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/nu9030209
  23. Steele EM, 2017, POPUL HEALTH METR, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12963-017-0119-3
  24. Steele EM, 2016, BMJ OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892