A prospective study of the influence of the skeleton on calcium mass transfer during hemodialysis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Autores
GOLDENSTEIN, Patricia Taschner
GRACIOLLI, Fabiana Giorgeti
ANTUNES, Gisele Lins
MOE, Sharon
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.13, n.7, article ID e0198946, 14p, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Calcium gradient, the difference between serum calcium and dialysate calcium d[Ca], is the main contributor factor influencing calcium transfer during hemodialysis. The impact, however, of bone turnover, on calcium mass transfer during hemodialysis is still uncertain. Methods This prospective cross-sectional study included 10 patients on hemodialysis for a 57.6 +/- 16.8 months, with severe hyperparathyroidism. Patients were submitted to 3 hemodialysis sessions using d[Ca] of 1.25, 1.5 and 1.75 mmol/l in three situations: pre-parathyroidectomy (pre-PTX), during hungry bone (early post-PTX), and after stabilization of clinical status (late post-PTX). Biochemical analysis and calcium mass transfer were evaluated and serum bone-related proteins were quantified. Results Calcium mass transfer varied widely among patients in each study phase with a median of -89.5, -76.8 and -3 mmol using d[Ca] 1.25 mmol/L, -106, -26.8 and 29.7 mmol using d[Ca] 1.50 mmol/L, and 12.8, -14.5 and 38 mmol using d[Ca] 1.75 mmol/L during pre-PTX, early post-PTX and late post-PTX, respectively, which was significantly different among d[Ca] (p = 0.0001) and among phases (p = 0.040). Ca gradient and delta of Ca also differed among d [Ca] and phases (p<0.05 for all comparisons), whether ultrafiltration was similar. Serum Osteocalcin decreased significantly in late post-PTX, whereas Sclerostin increased earlier, in early post-PTX. Conclusions The skeleton plays a key role in Ca mass transfer during dialysis, either by determining pre-dialysis serum Ca or by controlling the exchangeable Ca pool. Knowing that could help us to decide which d[Ca] should be chosen in a given patient.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. ARGILES A, 1995, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V10, P2083
  2. Argiles A, 1997, KIDNEY INT, V52, P530, DOI 10.1038/ki.1997.364
  3. ARGILES A, 1993, KIDNEY INT, V43, P630, DOI 10.1038/ki.1993.92
  4. Basile C, 2013, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V62, P1018, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.028
  5. Basile C, 2012, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V59, P92, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.033
  6. Basile C, 2011, J NEPHROL, V24, P742, DOI 10.5301/JN.2011.6385
  7. Bosticardo G, 2012, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V27, P2489, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfr733
  8. Cheng YL, 1997, INT J ARTIF ORGANS, V20, P14
  9. Fabrizi F, 1996, NEPHRON, V72, P530, DOI 10.1159/000188934
  10. Hill KM, 2013, KIDNEY INT, V83, P959, DOI 10.1038/ki.2012.403
  11. HOU SH, 1991, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V18, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80882-1
  12. Karohl C, 2010, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V25, P1244, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfp597
  13. Ketteler M, 2017, KIDNEY INT, V92, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.006
  14. KURZ P, 1994, KIDNEY INT, V46, P855, DOI 10.1038/ki.1994.342
  15. Melo NCV, 2014, HEMODIAL INT, V18, P473, DOI 10.1111/hdi.12126
  16. Moe SM, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V76, pS3, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.189
  17. Ok E, 2016, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V27, P2475, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2015030268
  18. Sigrist M, 2006, J RENAL NUTR, V16, P41, DOI 10.1053/j.jrn.2005.10.006
  19. Spasovski G, 2007, BONE, V41, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2007.06.014
  20. Spiegel DM, 2012, KIDNEY INT, V81, P1116, DOI 10.1038/ki.2011.490
  21. Talmage R. V., 2003, Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions, V3, P194
  22. TALMAGE RV, 1957, ENDOCRINOLOGY, V61, P256, DOI 10.1210/endo-61-3-256
  23. Toussaint Nigel, 2006, Hemodial Int, V10, P326, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2006.00125.x
  24. Zimmerman DL, 2013, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V62, P97, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.357