The effects of recruitment maneuver during noninvasive ventilation after coronary bypass grafting: A randomized trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Sistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP MIURA, Mieko Claudia FMUSP-HC
CARVALHO, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de FMUSP-HC
SILVEIRA, Leda Tomiko Yamada da FMUSP-HC
REGENGA, Marisa de Moraes
DAMIANI, Lucas Petri
FU, Carolina FMUSP-HC 2018
dc.identifier.citation JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, v.156, n.6, p.2170-2177.e1, 2018
dc.identifier.issn 0022-5223
dc.description.abstract Objective: Pulmonary impairment is a common complication after coronary artery bypass graft procedure and may be prevented or treated by noninvasive ventilation. Recruitment maneuvers include sustained airway pressure with high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with hypoxemia, favoring homogeneous pulmonary ventilation and oxygenation. This study aimed to evaluate whether noninvasive ventilation with recruitment maneuver could safely improve oxygenation in patients with atelectasis and hypoxemia who underwent a coronary artery bypass grafting procedure. Methods: Thirty-four patients admitted to our intensive care unit undergoing mechanical ventilation after surgery, with ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen < 300 and radiologic atelectasis score >= 2, were included. The control group consisted of 16 randomized patients and the recruitment group consisted of 18 patients. After extubation, noninvasive ventilation was applied for 30 minutes 3 times a day with positive end-expiratory pressure of 8 cm H2O. The recruitment group received recruitment maneuver with positive end-expiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O and 20 cm H2O for 2 minutes each during noninvasive ventilation. We analyzed the arterial oxygen partial pressure in room air, radiologic atelectasis score, hemodynamic stability, and adverse events from extubation until discharge. Results: Arterial oxygen partial pressure increased 12.6% +/- 6.8 % in the control group and 23.3 % +/- 8.5 % in the recruitment group (P < .001). The radiologic atelectasis score was completely improved for 94.4% of the recruitment group with no adverse events, whereas 87.5 % of the control group presented some atelectasis (P < .001). Conclusions: Noninvasive ventilation with recruitment maneuvers is safe, improves oxygenation, and reduces atelectasis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher MOSBY-ELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
dc.rights restrictedAccess
dc.subject noninvasive ventilation; myocardial revascularization; coronary artery bypass grafting; pulmonary atelectasis; hypoxia; positive end-expiratory pressure; cardiopulmonary bypass
dc.subject.other positive airway pressure; end-expiratory pressure; cardiac-surgery; pulmonary complications; strategy; atelectasis; extubation; mortality; volume; care
dc.title The effects of recruitment maneuver during noninvasive ventilation after coronary bypass grafting: A randomized trial
dc.type article
dc.rights.holder Copyright MOSBY-ELSEVIER LIM/09 LIM/34
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.004
dc.identifier.pmid 29945735
dc.type.category original article
dc.type.version publishedVersion MIURA, Mieko Claudia:FM: CARVALHO, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de:FM:MCP SILVEIRA, Leda Tomiko Yamada da:FM:MFT FU, Carolina:FM:MFT · REGENGA, Marisa de Moraes:Hosp Coracao, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
· DAMIANI, Lucas Petri:Hosp Coracao, HCor Res Inst, Sao Paulo, Brazil WOS:000450355500041 2-s2.0-85048882131 NEW YORK USA
hcfmusp.relation.reference · Al Jaaly E, 2013, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V146, P912, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.014
· AlJaaly EA, 2015, OXID MED CELL LONGEV, V2015
· Amato MBP, 1998, NEW ENGL J MED, V338, P347, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602
· Apostolakis E, 2010, J CARDIAC SURG, V25, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00823.x
· Auler Junior José Otávio Costa, 2007, Rev. Bras. Anestesiol., V57, P476, DOI 10.1590/S0034-70942007000500003
· Badenes R, 2015, CRIT CARE RES PRACT, DOI 10.1155/2015/420513
· Cabrini L, 2013, HEART LUNG VESSEL, V5, P137
· Cammarota G, 2011, INTENS CARE MED, V37, P1095, DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2239-8
· Cavalcanti AB, 2017, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V318, P1335, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.14171
· Celebi S, 2008, ANESTH ANALG, V107, P614, DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e65a1
· Chiumello D, 2011, INTENS CARE MED, V37, P918, DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2210-8
· Claxton BA, 2003, ANAESTHESIA, V58, P111, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02892.x
· De Santo LS, 2009, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V137, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.067
· Diretrizes Brasileira de Ventilacao Mecanica, 2013, REV BRAS TER INTENSI, V26, P89
· Duggan M, 2005, CURR OPIN ANESTHESIO, V20, P37
· Dyhr T, 2002, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V46, P717, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460615.x
· Guarracino F, 2011, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V77, P734
· Hansen LS, 2015, ANN CARD ANAESTH, V18, P138, DOI 10.4103/0971-9784.154462
· Herbst-Rodrigues MV, 2012, J CARDIOTHORAC SURG, V7, DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-7-58
· Jaber S, 2010, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V112, P453, DOI 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c5e5f2
· Leme AC, 2017, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V317, P1422, DOI 10.1001/jama.2017.2297
· Lopes CR, 2008, REV BRAS CIR CARDIOV, V23, P344, DOI 10.1590/S0102-76382008000300010
· Olper L, 2011, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V77, P40
· Pasquina P, 2004, ANESTH ANALG, V99, P1001, DOI 10.1213/01.ane.0000130621.11024.97
· Stephan F, 2015, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V313, P2331, DOI 10.1001/jama.2015.5213
· Suzuki S, 2015, J CRIT CARE, V30, P1232, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.07.033
· Villar J, 2006, CRIT CARE MED, V34, P1311, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01
· Westerdahl E, 2016, J CARDIOTHORAC SURG, V11, DOI 10.1186/s13019-016-0491-2
· Zarbock A, 2009, CHEST, V135, P1252, DOI 10.1378/chest.08-1602
dc.description.index MEDLINE
dc.identifier.eissn 1097-685X
hcfmusp.citation.scopus 3
hcfmusp.citation.wos 2 Brasil

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


My Account