Ongoing maturation in the time-compressed speech test
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.73, article ID e407, 5p, 2018
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: To verify the neuromaturational influence in the ability of auditory closure, that is, to verify the performance of children and young adults in the ability of auditory closure, through the time compressed speech test (TCS). METHODS: Thirty children (8 to 10 years old) and 30 young adults (16 to 24 years old) with normal hearing without complaints (neurological, cognitive, auditory processing) who performed TFC (monosyllables and disyllables) with a compression ratio of 60% in both ears. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and ANOVA with repeated measures with a significance level of 0.05. The minimum statistical power was 80%. RESULTS: In the comparison between ears, there was no significant difference between groups for the monosyllables. For disyllables, the second ear tested was better in children, and the right ear was better than the left ear for young adults. In the comparison between modalities (monosyllables and disyllables), children did not show significant differences. The performance of the young adults was better in the disyllables in both ears. Comparing the age groups, the young adults were better than the children for both modalities and ears. CONCLUSION: The study has demonstrated the influence and impact of age (maturational factor) on TCS test performance, showing the importance of establishing normality patterns for various age groups to provide a standardized tool for evaluation of auditory closure ability.
Palavras-chave
Hearing, Auditory Perception, Auditory Pathways
Referências
- Baran JA, 1999, CONT PERSPECTIVES HE, P377
- BEASLEY DS, 1972, J SPEECH HEAR RES, V15, P340, DOI 10.1044/jshr.1502.340
- BEASLEY DS, 1976, J SPEECH HEAR DISORD, V41, P216, DOI 10.1044/jshd.4102.216
- Castro FZ, 2012, J HEAR SCI, V2, P23
- HEILMAN KM, 1973, NEUROLOGY, V23, P384, DOI 10.1212/WNL.23.4.384
- Keith RW, 1982, CENTRAL AUDITORY LAN, P61
- Keith RW, 2002, J ED AUDIOL, V10, P15
- KIMURA D, 1961, CAN J PSYCHOLOGY, V15, P166, DOI 10.1037/h0083219
- Krishnamurti S, 2007, HDB CENTRAL AUDITORY, VI, P193
- Marckersie CL, 2002, CURR OPIN OTOLARYNGO, V10, P392, DOI 10.1097/00020840-200210000-00012
- MORALESGARCIA C, 1972, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V74, P307, DOI 10.3109/00016487209128456
- Mueller HG, 1985, HDB CLIN AUDIOLOGY, P355
- Rabelo CM, 2007, CLINICS, V62, P261, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322007000300010
- Rawool VW, 2007, AUDITORY PROCESSING, P117
- Sinha SO, 1959, THESIS