Characterization of scrotal involvement in children and adolescents with IgA vasculitis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
12
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMC
Citação
ADVANCES IN RHEUMATOLOGY, v.58, article ID 38, 5p, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To characterize scrotal involvement in children and adolescents with IgA vasculitis. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study included 296 IgA vasculitis (EULAR/PRINTO/PRES criteria) patients, 150/296 (51%) were males and assessed by demographic/clinical/laboratory and treatments. Scrotal involvement was defined by the presence of scrotal edema and/or pain/tenderness in physical examination and/or testicular Doppler ultrasound abnormalities. Results: Scrotal involvement was observed in 28/150 (19%) IgA vasculitis patients. This complication was evidenced at IgA vasculitis diagnosis in 27/28 (96%). Acute recurrent scrotal involvement was observed in 2/150 (1%) and none had chronic subtype. Further analysis of patients with scrotal involvement at first episode (n = 27) compared to those without this complication (n = 122) revealed that the median age at diagnosis [4.0 (2.0-12) vs. 6 (1.3-13) years, p = 0.249] was similar in both groups. The frequency of elevated serum IgA was significantly lower in IgA vasculitis patients with scrotal involvement versus without this manifestation (18% vs. 57%, p = 0.017), whereas glucocorticoid (93% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001) and ranitidine use (63% vs. 30%, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the former group. Conclusions: The scrotal involvement occurred in almost one fifth of IgA vasculitis patients and was commonly evidenced as acute subtype at diagnosis. Scrotal signs/symptoms improved after a prompt use of glucocorticoid and was associated with low frequency of elevated IgA serum levels.
Palavras-chave
IgA vasculitis, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, Scrotal vasculitis, Children, Glucocorticoid, Testicular ultrasound
Referências
  1. Akcan-Arikan A, 2007, KIDNEY INT, V71, P1028, DOI 10.1038/sj.ki.5002231
  2. Ben-Sira L, 2000, PEDIATR RADIOL, V30, P125, DOI 10.1007/s002470050029
  3. Buscatti IM, 2018, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V37, P1319, DOI 10.1007/s10067-017-3972-3
  4. Calvo-Rio V, 2014, MEDICINE, V93, P106, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000000019
  5. CHAMBERLAIN RS, 1992, PEDIATR EMERG CARE, V8, P213, DOI 10.1097/00006565-199208000-00010
  6. Chan James C M, 2002, Pediatr Rev, V23, P47, DOI 10.1542/pir.23-2-47
  7. de Almeida JLJ, 2007, J PEDIAT, V83, P259, DOI [10.2223/JPED.1638, 10.1590/S0021-75572007000400012]
  8. Gunes M, 2012, TURKISH J PEDIATR, V54, P194
  9. Ha TS, 2007, ACTA PAEDIATR, V96, P552, DOI 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00173.x
  10. Jauhola O, 2010, ARCH DIS CHILD, V95, P871, DOI 10.1136/adc.2009.167874
  11. Kawasaki Yukihiko, 2013, Fukushima J Med Sci, V59, P15
  12. Kiryluk K, 2011, KIDNEY INT, V80, P79, DOI 10.1038/ki.2011.16
  13. Lim Y, 2015, ULTRASONOGRAPHY, V34, P144, DOI 10.14366/usg.14042
  14. Modi S, 2016, UROL CASE REP, V6, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.01.004
  15. National Kidney Foundation, 2002, Am J Kidney Dis, V39, pS1
  16. Natl High Blood Pressure Educ Prog, 2004, PEDIATRICS, V114, P555
  17. Ozen S, 2017, CURR OPIN RHEUMATOL, V29, P530, DOI 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000424
  18. Ozen S, 2010, ANN RHEUM DIS, V69, P798, DOI 10.1136/ard.2009.116657
  19. Pacheva IH, 2017, CASE REP PEDIAT, DOI 10.1155/2017/5483543
  20. Rabelo C, 2008, ACTA REUMATOL PORT, V33, P452
  21. Rottenstreich Misgav, 2017, BMC Res Notes, V10, P241, DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2590-0
  22. Silva CA, 2012, CLIN REV ALLERG IMMU, V42, P256, DOI 10.1007/s12016-011-8281-z
  23. Suehiro RM, 2007, TURKISH J PEDIATR, V49, P189
  24. Tabel Y, 2012, IRAN J KIDNEY DIS, V6, P269
  25. Verim L, 2013, ARCH ITAL UROL ANDRO, V85, P50, DOI 10.4081/aiua.2013.1.50
  26. Zhao LX, 2017, UROLOGY, V107, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.005