Motor Control Training Compared With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Disc Herniation With Associated Radiculopathy A Randomized Controlled Trial

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_FRANCA_Motor_Control_Training_Compared_With_Transcutaneous_Electrical_Nerve_2019.PDF (420.63 KB)
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
FRANCA, Fabio Jorge Renovato
CALLEGARI, Bianca
BURKE, Thomaz Nogueira
MAGALHAES, Mauricio Oliveira
COMACHIO, Josielli
CARVALHOSILVA, Ana Paula Moura Campos
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, v.98, n.3, p.207-214, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of motor control training and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in relieving pain, reducing functional disability, and improving transversus abdominis activation in patients with lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy. Design: This is a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Forty patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into two groups: motor control training group (n = 20) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group (n = 20). Interventions: The motor control training group and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group attended 60 mini sessions twice aweek for 8 wks, totaling to 16 sessions. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures are pain, functional disability, and transversus abdominis activation capacity. Results: Differences between both groups were observed after 8 wks, favoring the motor control training group. Motor control training was more effective than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in relieving pain (mean difference = 3.3 points, 95% confidence interval = 2.12- 4.48), reducing functional disability (mean difference = 8.4 points, 95% confidence interval = 5.44- 11.36), improving the quality of pain (mean difference = 17 points, 95% confidence interval = 7.93- 26.07), sensory quality of pain (mean difference = 10.3 points, 95% confidence interval = 5.55- 15.05), and transversus abdominis activation (mean difference = 1.5 points, 95% confidence interval = 0.90- 2.10). Conclusions: The results suggest that motor control training is more effective than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with respect to relieving pain, reducing functional disability, and improving transversus abdominis activation in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
Palavras-chave
Low Back Pain, Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Transversus Abdominis
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31149
Referências
  1. Bakhtiarya AH, 2005, J BACK MUSCULOSKELET, V18, P55, DOI 10.3233/BMR-2005-183-401
  2. Bejia I, 2004, JOINT BONE SPINE, V71, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.01.008
  3. Boonstra AM, 2008, INT J REHABIL RES, V31, P165, DOI 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93
  4. Bystrom MG, 2013, SPINE, V38, pE350, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435fb
  5. Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, V2nd, P567, DOI [10.1234/12345678, DOI 10.1234/12345678]
  6. Costa LDM, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P903, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.009
  7. Lima POD, 2011, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V97, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.physio.2010.08.004
  8. Facci LM, 2011, SAO PAULO MED J, V129, P206, DOI 10.1590/S1516-31802011000400003
  9. Ferreira PH, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P1166, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061515
  10. Franca FR, 2012, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V35, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.012
  11. Gibson JNA, 2007, SPINE, V32, P1735, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180bc2431
  12. GOTTLIEB GL, 1988, EXP BRAIN RES, V73, P436
  13. Hahne AJ, 2010, SPINE, V35, pE488, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc3f56
  14. Hides J, 2006, SPINE, V31, pE175, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000202740.86338.df
  15. Hides J A, 2001, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), V26, pE243, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200106010-00004
  16. Hides JA, 1996, SPINE, V21, P2763, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00011
  17. Hodges P, 1996, Physiother Res Int, V1, P30, DOI 10.1002/pri.45
  18. Hwang JA, 2013, J PHYS THER SCI, V25, P1189, DOI 10.1589/jpts.25.1189
  19. JOHNSON MI, 1991, PAIN, V44, P231, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90090-K
  20. Kankaanpaa M, 1999, SPINE, V24, P1034, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00019
  21. Kreiner DS, 2014, SPINE J, V14, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003
  22. Macedo LG, 2012, PHYS THER, V92, P363, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20110290
  23. MARCHAND S, 1993, PAIN, V54, P99, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90104-W
  24. MELZACK R, 1965, SCIENCE, V150, P971, DOI 10.1126/science.150.3699.971
  25. Moon HJ, 2013, ANN REHABIL MED-ARM, V37, P110, DOI 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.110
  26. O'Sullivan PB, 1997, SPINE, V22, P2959, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020
  27. Park SD, 2013, J EXERC REHABIL, V9, P286, DOI 10.12965/jer.130012
  28. Patla AE, 2002, EXP BRAIN RES, V143, P318, DOI 10.1007/s00221-001-0968-6
  29. Pop Teresa, 2010, Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, V12, P289
  30. PW Hodges, 2013, SPINAL CONTROL REHAB
  31. Richardson C, 2004, THERAPEUTIC EXERCISE
  32. Richardson C A, 1995, Man Ther, V1, P2, DOI 10.1054/math.1995.0243
  33. Searle A, 2015, CLIN REHABIL, V29, P1155, DOI 10.1177/0269215515570379
  34. Sherry E, 2001, NEUROL RES, V23, P780, DOI 10.1179/016164101101199180
  35. Storheim Kjersti, 2002, Physiother Res Int, V7, P239, DOI 10.1002/pri.263
  36. Unlu Z, 2008, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V31, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.001
  37. Vance CGT, 2014, PAIN MANAG, V4, P197, DOI [10.2217/PMT.14.13, 10.2217/pmt.14.13]
  38. Vigatto R, 2007, SPINE, V32, P481, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47
  39. Waddell G, 2004, BACK PAIN REVOLUTION
  40. Wang XJ, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036663
  41. Watson W B, 1912, Br Med J, V1, P946

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/54