Clinical results of pulsed signal therapy on patellofemoral syndrome with patellar chondropathy

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_GOBBI_Clinical_results_of_pulsed_signal_therapy_on_patellofemoral_2019.PDF (581.05 KB)
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
WILEY
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Métricas da Revista
JCR
SJR
Autores
ESPREGUEIRA-MENDES, Joao
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, v.40, n.2, p.83-90, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of pulsed signal therapy (PST) on patellofemoral pain syndrome associated with patellar chondropathy. A prospective randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial included 25 patients (41 knees) between 20 and 50 years with pain due to isolated patellofemoral syndrome with chondropathy. PST group received nine 60-min daily sessions of PST treatment. Control group received the same protocol of blinded placebo treatment. The main outcome was change from baseline Kujala score at 3 months. After 3 months, patients in the control group received effective treatment (placebo post-treatment). All patients were then followed, for up to 12 months. Seventeen knees (5 males and 12 females, mean age 36.7 +/- 7.9) received placebo and 24 knees (8 males and 16 females, mean age 35.5 +/- 8.9) received PST. By the third month, PST group exhibited a mean change from baseline of 9.63 +/- 7.5 Kujala points, compared to 0.53 +/- 1.8 in the placebo group (P < 0.001). A significant progressive improvement was seen in the PST group between the 3rd and 6th and between the 6th and 12th month (P < 0.016). Patients initially allocated in the control group also improved at 3 months (P < 0.001) and 6 months (P = 0.005) post-effective treatment. In conclusion, PST in patellofemoral pain syndrome with chondropathy was effective compared to placebo at 3 months, showing an important improvement of Kujala score. The improvement was progressive and maintained up to 12 months. PST is safe and should be considered as a non-invasive option for management of this condition. Bioelectromagnetics. 40:83-90, 2019. (c) 2019 Bioelectromagnetics Society
Palavras-chave
patellofemoral syndrome, pulsed electromagnetic field, pulsed signal therapy, patellar chondropathy
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31187
Referências
  1. Anbarasan S, 2016, INDIAN J ORTHOP, V50, P87, DOI 10.4103/0019-5413.173522
  2. Ay S, 2009, RHEUMATOL INT, V29, P663, DOI 10.1007/s00296-008-0754-x
  3. Bagnato GL, 2016, RHEUMATOLOGY, V55, P755, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kev426
  4. BASSETT CAL, 1972, SCIENCE, V178, P982, DOI 10.1126/science.178.4064.982
  5. Cadossi M, 2014, FOOT ANKLE INT, V35, P981, DOI 10.1177/1071100714539660
  6. Collarile M, 2018, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V26, P1223, DOI 10.1007/s00167-017-4605-8
  7. Iammarrone CS, 2016, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V37, P81, DOI 10.1002/bem.21953
  8. Iannitti T, 2013, CLIN INTERV AGING, V8, P1289, DOI 10.2147/CIA.S35926
  9. Jahns ME, 2007, MED BIOL ENG COMPUT, V45, P917, DOI 10.1007/s11517-007-0216-8
  10. KUJALA UM, 1993, ARTHROSCOPY, V9, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80366-4
  11. Liu HX, 1996, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V4, P63, DOI 10.1016/S1063-4584(96)80008-2
  12. Markoll R, 2001, PAIN MANAGEMENT PRAC, P715
  13. Massari L, 2015, J BIOL REG HOMEOS AG, V29, P1013
  14. McCarthy CJ, 2006, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V7, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-7-51
  15. Moretti B, 2012, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-88
  16. Nelson FR, 2013, RHEUMATOL INT, V33, P2169, DOI 10.1007/s00296-012-2366-8
  17. Nunes GS, 2013, PHYS THER SPORT, V14, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.11.003
  18. Ongaro A, 2011, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V32, P543, DOI 10.1002/bem.20663
  19. Ozguclu E, 2010, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V29, P927, DOI 10.1007/s10067-010-1453-z
  20. Petersen W, 2016, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V136, P975, DOI 10.1007/s00402-016-2464-2
  21. Sadoghi P, 2013, ORTHOPEDICS, V36, pE360, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20130222-27
  22. Tan LJ, 2015, INT ORTHOP, V39, P549, DOI 10.1007/s00264-014-2542-4
  23. Thamsborg G, 2005, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V13, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.012
  24. TROCK DH, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P1903
  25. TROCK DH, 1993, J RHEUMATOL, V20, P456
  26. Van der Heijden RA, 2016, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V52, P110
  27. Varani K, 2008, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V16, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.004
  28. Veronesi F, 2014, J ORTHOP RES, V32, P677, DOI 10.1002/jor.22584
  29. Veronesi F, 2015, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12891-015-0760-6
  30. We SR, 2013, RHEUMATOLOGY, V52, P815, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kes063
  31. Wuschech H, 2015, BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, V36, P576, DOI 10.1002/bem.21942

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41