Assessing bone impairment in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using the trabecular bone score (TBS) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
23
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Autores
Citação
BONE, v.122, p.8-13, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: To compare bone quality using the trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone microarchitecture in the distal tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients and healthy controls (HC). Methods: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and TBS (TBS iNsight software) were evaluated using DXA (Hologic, QDR 4500); while volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone microarchitecture were analyzed in the distal tibia using HR-pQCT (Scanco) in 73 male patients with AS and 52 age-matched HC. Results: AS patients were a mean 41.6 +/- 7.9 years old and had a mean disease duration of 16.4 +/- 8.6 y, with a mean mSASSS 25.6 +/- 16.4. No difference was observed in lumbar spine aBMD in AS patients and HC (p = 0.112), but total hip BMD (p = 0.011) and TBS (p < 0.001) were lower in AS patients. In the distal tibia, reduced trabecular volumetric density [Tb.vBMD (p < 0.006)] and structural alterations - trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), p = 0.044 and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), p = 0.039 - were observed in AS patients relative to controls. Further analysis comparing TBS < 1.310 and TBS >= 1.310 in AS patients revealed a higher mean body mass index [BMI] (p = 0.010), lower tibia cortical vBMD [Ct.vBMD] (p = 0.007), lower tibia cortical thickness [Ct.Th] : (p = 0.048) in the former group. On logistic regression analysis, BMI (OR = 1.27; 95%IC = 1.08-1.50, p = 0.005), (VF 4.65; 1.13-19.1, p = 0.033) and tibial Ct.vBMD (0.98; 0.97-1.00, p = 0.007) were associated with a lower TBS ( < 1.310). Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that TBS and HR-pQCT imaging are important technologies evaluating bone impairment in AS patients. Moreover, in these patients vertebral fractures were associated with lower TBS.
Palavras-chave
Ankylosing spondylitis, Trabecular bone score, HR-pQCT, DXA, Bone density, Vertebral fractures
Referências
  1. Alvarenga JC, 2017, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V28, P1335, DOI 10.1007/s00198-016-3876-0
  2. Boutroy S, 2005, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V90, P6508, DOI 10.1210/jc.2005-1258
  3. Briot K, 2015, RMD OPEN, V1, DOI 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000014
  4. Cao JJ, 2011, J ORTHOP SURG RES, V6, DOI 10.1186/1749-799X-6-30
  5. Capaci K, 2003, YONSEI MED J, V44, P379, DOI 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.3.379
  6. Carter Shea, 2011, Curr Osteoporos Rep, V9, P112, DOI 10.1007/s11914-011-0058-z
  7. Creemers MCW, 2005, ANN RHEUM DIS, V64, P127, DOI 10.1136/ard.2004.020503
  8. Domiciano DS, 2013, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V65, P809, DOI 10.1002/acr.21905
  9. Feldtkeller E, 2006, RHEUMATOL INT, V26, P234, DOI 10.1007/s00296-004-0556-8
  10. Fuller H, 2015, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V55, P352, DOI [10.1016/j.rbr.2014.07.010, 10.1016/j.rbre.2014.07.010]
  11. GENANT HK, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, P1137, DOI 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915
  12. Geusens P, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P1856
  13. Geusens P, 2014, NAT REV RHEUMATOL, V10, P304, DOI 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.23
  14. Ghozani I, 2009, BONE, V44, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.028
  15. Gilgil E, 2005, J RHEUMATOL, V32, P292
  16. Grazio S, 2012, RHEUMATOL INT, V32, P2801, DOI 10.1007/s00296-011-2066-9
  17. Haroon NN, 2015, ARTHRITIS RES THER, V17, DOI 10.1186/s13075-015-0873-1
  18. Klingberg E, 2013, ARTHRITIS RES THER, V15, DOI 10.1186/ar4368
  19. Klingberg E, 2012, J RHEUMATOL, V39, P1987, DOI 10.3899/jrheum.120316
  20. Kolta S, 2014, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V25, P1759, DOI 10.1007/s00198-014-2685-6
  21. Kolta S., 2018, J CLIN DENSITOM, P30024
  22. Lee YSL, 1997, AM J MED, V103, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00143-5
  23. Magrey MN, 2016, SEMIN ARTHRITIS RHEU, V46, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.03.003
  24. McCloskey EV, 2016, J BONE MINER RES, V31, P940, DOI 10.1002/jbmr.2734
  25. Muschitz C, 2015, BONE, V79, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.007
  26. Neumann A, 2018, ARTHRITIS RES THER, V20, DOI 10.1186/s13075-018-1620-1
  27. Padlina I, 2017, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V28, P909, DOI 10.1007/s00198-016-3829-7
  28. Pasoto SG, 2016, RHEUMATOLOGY, V55, P2200, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kew332
  29. Paupitz J. A., 2006, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V27, P1839
  30. Sieper J, 2002, ANN RHEUM DIS, V61, P8
  31. Sieper J., 2009, ANN RHEUM DIS S2, V68
  32. Singh HJ, 2013, J CLIN DIAGN RES, V7, P2832, DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6779.3770
  33. VANDERLINDEN S, 1984, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V27, P361
  34. Wildberger L, 2017, JOINT BONE SPINE, V84, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.05.015