Impact of methodological approaches in the agreement between subjective and objective methods for assessing screen time and sedentary behavior in pediatric population: a systematic review

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_NASCIMENTO-FERREIRA_Impact_of_methodological_approaches_in_the_agreement_between_2019.PDF (534.01 KB)
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ARAN EDICIONES, S L
Autores
MORENO, Luis A.
Citação
NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, v.36, n.2, p.449-462, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: sedentary behavior is an important target for health promotion. In this systematic review, we aimed to provide evidence to support decisions about measurement approach choices for subjectively assessing sedentary behavior in pediatric population, adopting objective methods as the reference. Methods: in this systematic review with meta-analysis, published studies were retrieved from electronic databases: Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, SPORTDiscus, BioMed Central and SCOPUS. We considered studies evaluating sedentary behavior agreement through questionnaire and/or diary in comparison with an objective measure. A total of six inclusion criteria v,rere used. We synthesized the data using correlation coefficients (r) as an indicator of agreement estimates. The review protocol is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42014015138). Results: a total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria with ages ranging from 3 to 17.5 years and provided 17 agreement analyses. Thirteen of these agreement analyses (76.5%) reported correlation coefficients. We found two major groups of sedentary activities: screen time (47.1%) and sedentary behaviors (52.9%). The pooled agreement between questionnaires and accelerometers for assessing self-reported screen time was negative (r =-0.15; Cl 95%:-0.17 to-0.13). Conversely, when the sedentary behavior was assessed by questionnaires and accelerometers, the pooled agreement,,vas positive for parent-reporting (r = 0.09; Cl 95%; 0.04 to 0.13) and self-reporting (r = 0.43; CI 95%: 0.40 to 0.47) in children and adolescents, respectively. Conclusion: questionnaires have positive agreement with accelerometers for assessing sedentary behavior, whereas the agreement is negative for assessing screen time. Self-reported questionnaires are recommended methods to measure sedentary behavior in adolescents.
Palavras-chave
Children, Adolescents, Sedentary behavior, Questionnaire, Measurement
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31783
Referências
  1. Affuso O, 2010, PEDIAT EXERC SCI, V22, P408
  2. Cordero MJA, 2014, NUTR HOSP, V29, P1250, DOI 10.3305/nh.2014.29.6.7410
  3. Ainsworth BE, 2011, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V43, P1575, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
  4. ANDERSON DR, 1985, CHILD DEV, V56, P1345, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00202.x
  5. Atkin AJ, 2012, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V41, P1460, DOI 10.1093/ije/dys118
  6. Barnes J, 2012, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR ME, V37, P540, DOI [10.1139/h2012-024, 10.1139/H2012-024]
  7. Biddle SJH, 2009, ANN BEHAV MED, V38, P147, DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9136-1
  8. Bringolf-Isler B, 2012, PEDIATR EXERC SCI, V24, P229, DOI 10.1123/pes.24.2.229
  9. Brown JE, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V70, P1816, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.040
  10. Bryant MJ, 2007, OBES REV, V8, P197, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00295.x
  11. Busschaert C, 2015, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V12, DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0277-2
  12. Dollman J, 2009, J SCI MED SPORT, V12, P518, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.09.007
  13. Egger M, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V315, P629, DOI 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  14. Egger M, 2011, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
  15. Ekelund U, 2016, LANCET, V388, P1302, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1
  16. Ford ES, 2012, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V41, P1338, DOI 10.1093/ije/dys078
  17. Gibbs BB, 2015, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V47, P1295, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000517
  18. Grant PM, 2006, BRIT J SPORT MED, V40, P992, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262
  19. Greco T, 2013, HEART LUNG VESSEL, V5, P219
  20. Hardy LL, 2007, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V40, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.009
  21. Helmerhorst HJF, 2012, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V9, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103
  22. Hidding LM, 2017, SPORTS MED, V47, P677, DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0610-1
  23. Higgins JPT, 2003, BRIT MED J, V327, P557, DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  24. Kelly P, 2016, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12966-016-0351-4
  25. Kmet LM, 2004, STANDARD QUALITY ASS
  26. Kottner J, 2011, INT J NURS STUD, V48, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
  27. Lubans DR, 2011, OBES REV, V12, P781, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00896.x
  28. Ludbrook J, 2002, CLIN EXP PHARMACOL P, V29, P527, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03686.x
  29. Mandich G, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P5528, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120505528
  30. Marshall AL, 2010, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V42, P1094, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c5ec18
  31. Marshall SJ, 2006, J ADOLESCENCE, V29, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.016
  32. Marshall SJ, 2004, INT J OBESITY, V28, P1238, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802706
  33. Martinez SM, 2014, J SLEEP RES, V23, P326, DOI 10.1111/jsr.12114
  34. Moher D, 2015, SYST REV, V4, DOI [10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]
  35. Murad MH, 2014, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V312, P171, DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.5559
  36. Must A, 2009, INT J OBESITY, V33, pS82, DOI 10.1038/ijo.2009.23
  37. Nascimento-Ferreira MV, 2016, SLEEP MED REV, V30, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.11.006
  38. Owen N, 2010, EXERC SPORT SCI REV, V38, P105, DOI 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2
  39. Pulsford RM, 2015, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V44, P1909, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyv191
  40. Reichert FF, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P1921, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001000008
  41. Rey-Lopez JP, 2012, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, P373, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckr040
  42. Robinson JL, 2006, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V3, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-3-43
  43. Saint-Maurice PF, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0143949
  44. Sterne JAC, 2001, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V323, P101, DOI 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
  45. Thorp AA, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V41, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.004
  46. Tremblay MS, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98
  47. Treuth MS, 2004, PREV MED, V38, pS43, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.01.001
  48. Trikalinos TA, 2012, J GEN INTERN MED, V27, pS67, DOI 10.1007/s11606-012-2031-7
  49. Trost SG, 2007, J SCI MED SPORT, V10, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.018
  50. Tudor-Locke C, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P465, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000053701.30307.A6
  51. Verstraeten R, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1109
  52. Walker J, 2010, INTERPRETING STAT FI
  53. Wen LM, 2010, PEDIATR EXERC SCI, V22, P408, DOI 10.1123/pes.22.3.408
  54. World Bank web page, 2015, COUNTR LEND GROUPS
  55. World Health Organization, 2007, GROWTH REF DAT 5 19
  56. Xiao J, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147062
  57. Zaki R, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037908

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPR
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/39