The effectiveness of an auditory temporal training program in children who present voiceless/voiced-based orthographic errors

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.14, n.5, article ID e0216782, 15p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction Studies on children's written production of the Brazilian Portuguese have shown that one of the most frequent phonological-based orthographic errors is the one related to voiceless/voiced phonemes. Children who make this type of error may have auditory temporal processing disorders, which can harm the perception of phonemes with similar characteristics. Aim Verify the effectiveness of an auditory temporal training program based on activities adapted from the software Fast ForWord in the auditory temporal processing, i.e. the temporal ordering skill, and in reducing voiceless/voiced-based orthographic errors and the frequency of occurrence of these errors in the written production of the children. Method Twenty-five children participated on this study. They were divided in two groups: experimental group consisting of 16 participants, who engaged in the auditory temporal training activities; and a placebo group consisting of nine participants, who engaged in passive visual activities. The behavioral measures applied in the pre-training evaluation, post-training and placebo evaluations were: i) auditory skill of temporal ordering by the Pitch Pattern Sequence Test; and ii) analysis of the amount of voiceless/voiced-based orthographic errors and the frequency of occurrence of these errors by the use of dictation. Results No statistically significant differences were found concerning the placebo group in the pre-training and post-training evaluations, in all evaluation measures. However, statistically significant differences were found in the pre-training and post-training evaluations for the pitch pattern sequence test concerning the experimental group. These differences were specifically related to a reduction of the errors regarding fricative graphemes, and the frequency of occurrence of plosive and fricative graphemes. Conclusions The auditory temporal training program was effective in improving the temporal ordering skill and reducing errors in the writing of children who made voiceless/voiced-based orthographic errors.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Ahmed SM, 2017, J CURRENT MED RES PR, P86
  2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2005, CENTR AUD PROC DIS R
  3. Anderson S., 2013, FRONTIERS SYSTEMS NE, P7, DOI [10.3389/fnsys.2013.00007, DOI 10.3389/FNSYS.2013.00007]
  4. Andrade CRF, 2004, ABFW TESTE LINGUAGEM
  5. Angelelli P, 2010, CORTEX, V46, P1299, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.015
  6. Arnaut Mirian Aratangy, 2014, Audiol., Commun. Res., V19, P264, DOI 10.1590/S2317-643120140003000010
  7. Capellini Simone Aparecida, 2011, J. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol., V23, P227, DOI 10.1590/S2179-64912011000300008
  8. Cristofolini C., 2008, THESIS
  9. Ellis A. W., 1998, HUMAN COGNITIVE NEUR
  10. Ferguson MA, 2015, FRONT PSYCHOL, V6, DOI [10.3389/fpg.2015.00556, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00556]
  11. Filippini R, 2012, FOLIA PHONIATR LOGO, V64, P217, DOI 10.1159/000342139
  12. Fritz J., 2006, HEARING RES, V206, P159
  13. Gillarn RB, 2008, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V51, P97, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/007)
  14. Grunwell P., 1990, DESVIOS FONOLOGICOS
  15. Halliday LF, 2011, ATTEN PERCEPT PSYCHO, V73, P1329, DOI 10.3758/s13414-011-0148-0
  16. Kujala T, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P10509, DOI 10.1073/pnas.181589198
  17. Kwong T, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, P107
  18. McArthur G, 2007, DYSLEXIA, V13, P240, DOI 10.1002/dys.355
  19. Merzenich MM, 1996, SCIENCE, V271, P77, DOI 10.1126/science.271.5245.77
  20. Moojen SM, 2009, ESCRITA ORTOGRA FICA
  21. Moore DR, 2009, PHILOS T R SOC B, V364, P409, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2008.0187
  22. Moore DR, 2005, BRAIN LANG, V94, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.bundl.2004.11.009
  23. Morais AA, 2015, FRONT AGING NEUROSCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00078
  24. Moreno S, 2009, CEREB CORTEX, V19, P712, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhn120
  25. Murphy CFB, 2011, FOLIA PHONIATR LOGO, V63, P147, DOI 10.1159/000316327
  26. Murphy CFB, 2010, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V43, P359, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2010000400007
  27. Murphy CBF, 2009, REV SOC BRASILEIRA F
  28. Murphy CBF, 2009, THESIS
  29. Murphy CB, 2015, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V26, P19, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.3
  30. Musiek F E, 1994, J Am Acad Audiol, V5, P265
  31. Musiek FE, 2002, SEMIN HEAR, V23, P263, DOI 10.1055/S-2002-35862
  32. Nobile GG, 2009, PSICOL REV, V15, P36
  33. Pires MM, 2017, EFICACIA PROGRAMA TR
  34. Samelli AG, 2008, INT J AUDIOL, V47, P238, DOI 10.1080/14992020801908244
  35. Schaffler T, 2004, DYSLEXIA, V10, P119, DOI 10.1002/dys.267
  36. Schochat E, 2000, PRO FONO REV ATUALI, V2
  37. Scliar-Cabral L., 2003, GUIA PRACTICO ALFABE
  38. Sharma M, 2012, INT J AUDIOL, V51, P506, DOI 10.3109/14992027.2012.670272
  39. Shinn J.B., 2003, HEAR J, V56, P52
  40. Song JH, 2012, CEREB CORTEX, V22, P1180, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhr196
  41. Stevens K. N., 1997, HDB PHONETIC SCI, P462
  42. TALLAL P, 1980, BRAIN LANG, V9, P182, DOI 10.1016/0093-934X(80)90139-X
  43. Tallal P, 1996, SCIENCE, V271, P81, DOI 10.1126/science.271.5245.81
  44. Tomlin D, 2015, EAR HEARING, V36, P527, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000172
  45. Tormanen MRK, 2009, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V50, P277, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00708.x
  46. Veuillet E, 2007, BRAIN, V130, P2915, DOI 10.1093/brain/awm235
  47. Woodhead ZVJ, 2017, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V88, P586, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314621
  48. Ziegler W, 2015, CORTEX, V69, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.001
  49. Zuanetti Patrícia Aparecida, 2008, Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol., V13, P240, DOI 10.1590/S1516-80342008000300007
  50. 2013, BRAZ J OTORHINOLAR, V79, P753, DOI 10.5935/1808-8694.20130137