Organ Preservation in cT2N0 Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy The Impact of Radiation Therapy Dose-escalation and Consolidation Chemotherapy

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
108
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao
VAILATI, Bruna Borba
AGUILAR, Patricia Bailao
FERNANDEZ, Laura Melina
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
ANNALS OF SURGERY, v.269, n.1, p.102-107, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To demonstrate the difference in organ-preservation rates and avoidance of definitive surgery among cT2N0 rectal cancer patients undergoing 2 different chemoradiation (CRT) regimens. Background: Patients with cT2N0 rectal cancer are more likely to develop complete response to neoadjuvant CRT. Organ preservation has been considered an alternative treatment strategy for selected patients. Radiation dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy have been associated with increased rates of response and may improve chances of organ preservation among these patients. Methods: Patients with distal and nonmetastatic cT2N0 rectal cancer managed by neoadjuvant CRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing standard CRT (50.4 Gy and 2 cycles of 5-FU-based chemotherapy) were compared with those undergoing extended CRT (54 Gy and 6 cycles of 5-FUbased chemotherapy). Patients were assessed for tumor response at 8 to 10 weeks. Patients with complete clinical response (cCR) underwent organ-preservation strategy (""Watch and Wait""). Patients were referred to salvage surgery in the event of local recurrence during follow-up. Results: Thirty-five patients underwent standard and 46 patients extended CRT. Patients undergoing extended CRT were more likely to undergo organ preservation and avoid definitive surgical resection at 5years (67% vs 30%; P = 0.001). After development of a cCR, surgery-free survival is similar between extended and standard CRT groups at 5 years (78% vs 56%; P = 0.12). Conclusions: Dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy leads to increased long-term organ-preservation rates among cT2N0 rectal cancer. After achievement of a cCR, the risk for local recurrence and need for salvage surgery is similar, irrespective of the CRT regimen.
Palavras-chave
chemoradiation, neoadjuvant, organ preservation, rectal cancer, watch and wait
Referências
  1. Appelt AL, 2015, LANCET ONCOL, V16, P919, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00120-5
  2. Bettoni F, 2017, ANN SURG, V265, pE4, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001937
  3. Chan AKP, 2000, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V48, P843, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00692-1
  4. Garcia-Aguilar J, 2015, LANCET ONCOL, V16, P1537, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00215-6
  5. Garcia-Aguilar J, 2015, LANCET ONCOL, V16, P957, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00004-2
  6. Gerard JP, 2007, CLIN ONCOL-UK, V19, P661, DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2007.07.009
  7. Habr-Gama A, 2016, RADIAT ONCOL, V11, P1
  8. Habr-Gama A, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P7
  9. Habr-Gama A, 2017, DIS COLON RECTUM, V60, P586, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000830
  10. Habr-Gama A, 2016, DIS COLON RECTUM, V59, P264, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000543
  11. Habr-Gama A, 2013, DIS COLON RECTUM, V56, P1109, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182a25c4e
  12. Habr-Gama A, 2013, DIS COLON RECTUM, V56, P264, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318277e8e4
  13. Hompes R, 2013, COLORECTAL DIS, V15, pe576, DOI 10.1111/codi.12381
  14. Loos M, 2013, ANN SURG ONCOL, V20, P1816, DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2827-z
  15. Lopes-Ramos C, 2015, CANCER GENET-NY, V208, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.03.010
  16. Morino M, 2013, SURG ENDOSC, V27, P3315, DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-2911-x
  17. Perez RO, 2014, TECH COLOPROCTOL, V18, P699, DOI 10.1007/s10151-013-1113-9
  18. Perez RO, 2016, ANN SURG ONCOL, V23, P1143, DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4977-2
  19. Perez RO, 2011, DIS COLON RECTUM, V54, P545, DOI 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182083b84
  20. Taylor FGM, 2011, ANN SURG, V253, P711, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b8d52
  21. Valentini V, 2001, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V51, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01618-2
  22. Wiltshire KL, 2006, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V64, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.012
  23. 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P711, DOI 10.1097/01.SLA.0000141194.27992.32