Impact of Brush Cytology Analysis for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Quality of Liquid-Based Preparation of Cytological Slides
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
KARGER
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
MARIANO, Vania S.
PASTREZ, Paula R. A.
COSTA, Allini Mafra
GUIMARAES, Denise P.
CUNHA, Thiago R.
NETO, Said A. Z.
SCAPULATEMPO-NETO, Christovam
SYRJANEN, Kari J.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, v.63, n.3, p.240-246, 2019
Resumo
Objectives: The diagnostic performance of cytology in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is meticulously described. Methods: Cytological and biopsy specimens were prospectively taken during esophagogastroduodenoscopy of 123 individuals in 2013 and 2014. Cytology samples were maintained in preservative fluid until processing and biopsies were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Results: Based on endoscopic biopsy results, 70 cases were positive for ESCC whilst 53 were negative for cancer. In addition, brush cytology showed high sensitivity and specificity (98.57 and 96.23%, respectively) in detecting the disease, and high accuracy (97.5%) comparable to that provided by histopathology which is the accepted gold standard. Conclusion: Brush cytology specimens preserved in liquid medium may be a good alternative for ESCC diagnosis. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
Palavras-chave
Esophageal squamous cell cancer, Brush cytology, Liquid-based cytology, SurePath
Referências
- Choi J, 2010, SURG ENDOSC, V24, P1380, DOI 10.1007/s00464-009-0783-x
- COOK IJ, 1988, ACTA CYTOL, V32, P461
- de Graaf GW, 2007, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V33, P988, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.01.007
- Ferlay J, 2015, INT J CANCER, V136, pE359, DOI 10.1002/ijc.29210
- Gao QY, 2015, BEST PRACT RES CL GA, V29, P885, DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.09.018
- Glade M J, 1999, Nutrition, V15, P523
- HIRSCHOWITZ BI, 1963, LANCET, V2, P388
- International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon, IARC CANC BAS
- Jacobson BC, 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V57, P817, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)70048-0
- Kamangar F, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P2137, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308
- KASUGAI T, 1978, ACTA CYTOL, V22, P327
- Kim DY, 2004, ANZ J SURG, V74, P1060, DOI 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03268.x
- KOBAYASHI S, 1978, ACTA CYTOL, V22, P155
- KOSS LG, 1993, J CELL BIOCHEM, P66
- LANDIS JR, 1977, BIOMETRICS, V33, P159, DOI 10.2307/2529310
- Lao-Sirieix P, 2012, NAT REV CLIN ONCOL, V9, P278, DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.35
- Levy Ryan M, 2010, Adv Surg, V44, P101
- Ludmir EB, 2015, J GASTROINTEST ONCOL, V6, P287, DOI 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.001
- Malhotra V, 1996, ACTA CYTOL, V40, P929
- Mariette C, 2014, J CLIN ONCOL, V32, P2416, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6532
- Muriithi RW, 2014, ACTA CYTOL, V58, P483, DOI 10.1159/000368793
- NABEYA K, 1990, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V37, P368
- NIH National Cancer Institute, 2018, ES CANC SCREEN PDQ H
- Nishimura Y, 2002, J ULTRAS MED, V21, P49, DOI 10.7863/jum.2002.21.1.49
- ODONOGHUE JM, 1995, ACTA CYTOL, V39, P28
- PROLLA JC, 1977, ACTA CYTOL, V21, P399
- Ro TH, 2015, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V21, P9693, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v21.i33.9693
- Roshandel G, 2012, MIDDLE E J DIG DIS, V4, P111
- Stewart BW, 2003, WORLD CANC REPORT
- Sur M, 1998, PATHOLOGY, V30, P348, DOI 10.1080/00313029800169616
- SYRJANEN KJ, 1982, ARCH GESCHWULSTFORSC, V52, P283
- Vidyavathi K, 2008, INDIAN J PATHOL MICR, V51, P489, DOI 10.4103/0377-4929.43737
- Yan W, 2011, AM J CANCER RES, V1, P275
- Zhang L, 2016, EXPERT REV GASTROENT, V10, P595, DOI 10.1586/17474124.2016.1140036
- Zheng XQ, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117773