Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of the FACE-Q Questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_BUSTILLO_Translation_CrossCultural_Adaptation_and_Linguistic_Validation_of_the_2019.PDF (394.33 KB)
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
SPRINGER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, v.43, n.4, p.930-937, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes measurement instruments (PRO) are a good way to measure results after aesthetic procedures. FACE-Q is a systematized and standardized PRO tool and was not available in Portuguese. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included four stages: translation of FACE-Q, backtranslation, testing in patients who underwent facial aesthetic procedures and review of the questionnaires between September and December, 2018. Guidelines merging WHO and ISPOR's rules were followed. ResultsTranslation was conducted by two translators, resulting in two versions, translation A and translation B, which were reconciled to generate the first Portuguese version. Reconciliation showed inconsistencies between TA and TB in 63% (n=222) of the 353 questions, which were solved by maintaining TA in 25% of cases (n=87), TB in 27% and a new version in 11% (n=40) of the questions. Backtranslation showed written differences with the original FACE-Q in 64 (22.7%) of the 353 question, but only one case of semantic difference, which was corrected resulting in production of the second Portuguese version. Seven patients with a mean age of 35.8years were interviewed to assess the difficulty in understanding the questionnaires. Four patients had no or minor difficulties understanding the questionnaire, and the other three had difficulties and suggested changes that led to a third Portuguese version. The third version was reviewed for grammar and spelling resulting in the final Portuguese version.ConclusionA Brazilian Portuguese version of the FACE-Q questionnaire was obtained maintaining equivalency with the source instrument. This will allow cross-cultural research and comparison of results between different studies.Level of Evidence VThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Palavras-chave
Facial cosmetic surgery, Aesthetic surgery, Outcomes, Quality of life, Patient satisfaction, Patient-reported outcomes
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/32960
Referências
  1. Barone M, 2017, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V274, P1807, DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4359-9
  2. Barone M, 2017, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V274, P1771, DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4384-8
  3. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  4. Bulut OC, 2017, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V274, P1773, DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4386-6
  5. Cano SJ, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, p98E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819565c1
  6. Chang BL, 2016, AESTHET SURG J, V36, P810, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjv244
  7. Chen BG, 2017, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V70, P1129, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.028
  8. Cogliandro A, 2017, JAMA FACIAL PLAST SU, V19, P336, DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2103
  9. East C, 2017, FACIAL PLAST SURG, V33, P461, DOI 10.1055/s-0037-1606637
  10. Fleury CM, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V141, p28E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003962
  11. Hibler BP, 2016, J DRUGS DERMATOL, V15, P62
  12. Isaps.org, 2017, IS INT SURV AESTH CO
  13. Kappos EA, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V139, P839, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003164
  14. Klassen AF, 2017, JAMA FACIAL PLAST SU, V19, P7, DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1018
  15. Klassen AF, 2016, JAMA DERMATOL, V152, P443, DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0018
  16. Klassen AF, 2016, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V137, p651E, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000480007.03293.ed
  17. Klassen AF, 2016, JAMA FACIAL PLAST SU, V18, P27, DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1445
  18. Klassen AF, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, P375, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000895
  19. Klassen AF, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V133, P21, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000436814.11462.94
  20. Klassen AF, 2010, FACIAL PLAST SURG, V26, P303, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1262313
  21. Kosowski TR, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, P1819, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f361
  22. Lorenzen MM, 2018, J PLAST SURG HAND SU, V52, P343, DOI 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1498791
  23. Mess SA, 2017, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001551
  24. Panchapakesan V, 2013, AESTHET SURG J, V33, P1099, DOI 10.1177/1090820X13510170
  25. Poulsen L, 2017, EUR J PLAST SURG, V40, P29, DOI 10.1007/s00238-016-1247-x
  26. Pusic AL, 2013, CLIN PLAST SURG, V40, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001
  27. Qureshi AA, 2017, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V41, P1177, DOI 10.1007/s00266-017-0892-1
  28. Radulesco T, 2018, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V43, P1025, DOI 10.1111/coa.13086
  29. Raspaldo H, 2015, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000266
  30. Schwitzer JA, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, p830E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001159
  31. Sinno S, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V136, P239, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001412
  32. Tan SK, 2017, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001608
  33. Tenna S, 2017, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V41, P661, DOI 10.1007/s00266-017-0777-3
  34. Wild D, 2005, VALUE HEALTH, V8, P94, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04