Cultural adaptation and reliability of the questionnaire of sex education in schools

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
ABRASCO-ASSOC BRASILEIRA POS-GRADUACAO & SAUDE COLETIVA
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, v.24, n.7, p.2601-2608, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Sexuality is embedded in a social and cultural origin and its approach must go beyond biological aspects. Questionnaire on Sex Education in Schools (QUSES) assesses the knowledge, comfort, motivation and involvement of teachers in relation to sex education. This article aims to culturally adapt and verify the reliability of QUSES. The Experts Committee realized the Cultural adaptation and content validation. The Cronbach's alpha and its stratification were tested for reliability. It was applied to 100 teachers with an average of 44.45 (9.62) years of age. Words and phrases were modified, maintaining the equivalences of the original version. Question of knowledge was the most modified due to regulatory differences between countries. Reliability data was similar to the original instruments and were considered good. The lowest values were alpha = 0.741 for subscale of efficacy of results, alpha = 0.812 and alpha = 0.849 for subscale of involvement (cognitive). QUSES was culturally adapted for Brazilian elementary schools teachers presenting good reliability. It is relevant, because it evaluates sex education fully and may support in implementation and monitoring public policies related to health promotion in schools.
Palavras-chave
School health, Sexuality and psychosexual development
Referências
  1. Paz EPA, 2014, ACTA PAUL ENFERM, V27, P419, DOI 10.1590/1982-0194201400070
  2. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  3. Beiras A, 2005, ALETHEIA, P69
  4. Belo MSP, 2009, EDUCACAO SEXUAL MEIO
  5. Bentler PM, 2009, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V74, P137, DOI 10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1
  6. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude (MS), 2009, CAD AT BAS SAUD ESC
  7. CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  8. da Cruz LMB, 2008, SAUDE SOC-SAO PAULO, V17, P120, DOI 10.1590/S0104-12902008000200012
  9. da Silveira GF, 2014, SAUDE SOC-SAO PAULO, V23, P302, DOI 10.1590/S0104-12902014000100024
  10. Foucault M., 2014, HIST SEXUALIDADE USO
  11. GUILLEMIN F, 1993, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V46, P1417, DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  12. Heo M, 2015, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0070-6
  13. Jaques AE, 2012, SIGNIFICADO SEXUALID
  14. Machado B, 2011, PROMOCAO EDUCACAO SA
  15. Maroco J., 2006, LABORATORIO DE PSICO, V4, P65, DOI 10.14417/LP.763
  16. Marques AP, 2013, BRAZ J PHYS THER, V17, P170, DOI 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000072
  17. Martin SAF, 2010, EDUCACAO SEXUAL ESCO
  18. Moizes JS, 2010, REV ESC ENFERM USP, V44, P205, DOI 10.1590/S0080-62342010000100029
  19. Nunnally J. C, 1995, TEORIA PSICOMETRICA
  20. PILATTI L. A., 2010, REV BRAS ENSINO FIS, V3, P81
  21. Pinto RO, 2016, REV SAUDE PUBL, V50, DOI 10.1590/S01518-8787.2016050005855
  22. Puhan Milo A, 2005, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V3, P33, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-3-33
  23. Quirino GD, 2012, EDUC REV-CURITIBA, P205, DOI 10.1590/S0104-40602012000100014
  24. Ressel Lúcia Beatriz, 2003, Rev. esc. enferm. USP, V37, P82, DOI 10.1590/S0080-62342003000300010
  25. Serrao CSLS, 2009, PRATICAS EDUCACAO SE
  26. Sijtsma K, 2009, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V74, P107, DOI 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
  27. World Health Organization (WHO), 2006, SEX HLTH DOC RES JAN