Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Previous Myocardial Infarction Subanalysis From the DECLARE-TIMI 58 Trial
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
239
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
BONACA, Marc P.
RAZ, Itamar
ZELNIKER, Thomas A.
MOSENZON, Ofri
CAHN, Avivit
KUDER, Julia
MURPHY, Sabina A.
BHATT, Deepak L.
LEITER, Lawrence A.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
CIRCULATION, v.139, n.22, p.2516-2527, 2019
Resumo
Background: Sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitors reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Because of their baseline risk, patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) may derive even greater benefit from sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor therapy. Methods: DECLARE-TIMI 58 (Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 58) randomized 17 160 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and either established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=6974) or multiple risk factors (n=10 186) to dapagliflozin versus placebo. The 2 primary end points were composite of MACE (cardiovascular death, MI, or ischemic stroke) and the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. Those with previous MI (n=3584) made up a prespecified subgroup of interest. Results: In patients with previous MI (n=3584), dapagliflozin reduced the relative risk of MACE by 16% and the absolute risk by 2.6% (15.2% versus 17.8%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99; P=0.039), whereas there was no effect in patients without previous MI (7.1% versus 7.1%; HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.13; P=0.97; P for interaction for relative difference=0.11; P for interaction for absolute risk difference=0.048), including in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but no history of MI (12.6% versus 12.8%; HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.19). There seemed to be a greater benefit for MACE within 2 years after the last acute event (P for interaction trend=0.007). The relative risk reductions in cardiovascular death/hospitalization for heart failure were more similar, but the absolute risk reductions tended to be greater: 1.9% (8.6% versus 10.5%; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00; P=0.046) and 0.6% (3.9% versus 4.5%; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-1.00; P=0.055) in patients with and without previous MI, respectively (P interaction for relative difference=0.69; P interaction for absolute risk difference=0.010). Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and previous MI are at high risk of MACE and cardiovascular death/hospitalization for heart failure. Dapagliflozin appears to robustly reduce the risk of both composite outcomes in these patients. Future studies should aim to confirm the large clinical benefits with sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitors we observed in patients with previous MI.
Palavras-chave
myocardial infarction, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Referências
- Baigent C, 2010, LANCET, V376, P1670, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5
- Bhatt DL, 2016, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V67, P2732, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.529
- Bhatt DL, 2010, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V304, P1350, DOI 10.1001/jama.2010.1322
- Bonaca MP, 2018, CIRCULATION, V137, P338, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032235
- Bonaca MP, 2015, NEW ENGL J MED, V372, P1791, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1500857
- Cavender MA, 2015, CIRCULATION, V132, P923, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014796
- Cefalu WT, 2019, DIABETES CARE, V42, pS90, DOI 10.2337/dc19-S009
- Das SR, 2018, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V72, P3200, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.020
- Davies MJ, 2018, DIABETES CARE, V41, P2669, DOI 10.2337/dci18-0033
- Fitchett D, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, P1384, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037778
- GAIL M, 1985, BIOMETRICS, V41, P361, DOI 10.2307/2530862
- Heerspink HJL, 2013, DIABETES OBES METAB, V15, P853, DOI 10.1111/dom.12127
- Heerspink HJL, 2016, CIRCULATION, V134, P752, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887
- Inzucchi SE, 2018, DIABETES CARE, V41, pE4, DOI 10.2337/dc17-1551
- Januzzi JL, 2017, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V70, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.016
- Levey AS, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V150, P604, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
- Lin B, 2014, CARDIOVASC DIABETOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12933-014-0148-1
- Morrow DA, 2009, CIRCULATION, V119, P2758, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833665
- Neal B, 2017, NEW ENGL J MED, V377, P644, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925
- Packer M, 2017, JAMA CARDIOL, V2, P1025, DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2275
- Rawshani A, 2017, NEW ENGL J MED, V376, P1407, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1608664
- Raz I, 2018, DIABETES OBES METAB, V20, P1102, DOI 10.1111/dom.13217
- Sabatine MS, 2018, CIRCULATION, V138, P756, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034309
- Sabatine MS, 2017, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V5, P941, DOI 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30313-3
- Sandoval Y, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V63, P2079, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.541
- Sarwar N, 2010, LANCET, V375, P2215, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9
- Thygesen K, 2012, CIRCULATION, V126, P2020, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
- Torabi A, 2008, EUR HEART J, V29, P859, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn096
- Unnikrishnan R, 2017, DIABETES, V66, P1432, DOI 10.2337/db16-0766
- Verma S, 2018, CIRCULATION, V138, P2884, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034516
- Verma Subodh, 2018, JACC Basic Transl Sci, V3, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.07.006
- Verma S, 2018, DIABETOLOGIA, V61, P2108, DOI 10.1007/s00125-018-4670-7
- Wiviott SD, 2019, NEW ENGL J MED, V380, P347, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389
- Wiviott SD, 2018, AM HEART J, V200, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.012
- Zelniker TA, 2019, LANCET, V393, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32590-X
- Zelniker TA, 2018, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V72, P1845, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.040
- Zinman B, 2015, NEW ENGL J MED, V373, P2117, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720