Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Platelet P2Y(12) Receptor Antagonist Effects in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the PLATO Trial
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
37
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Autores
FRANCHI, Francesco
JAMES, Stefan K.
LAKIC, Tatevik Ghukasyan
BUDAJ, Andrzej J.
CORNEL, Jan H.
KATUS, Hugo A.
KELTAI, Matyas
KONTNY, Frederic
LEWIS, Basil S.
STOREY, Robert F.
Citação
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, v.8, n.6, article ID e011139, 21p, 2019
Resumo
Background-There are limited data on how the combination of diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects cardiovascular outcomes as well as response to different P2Y(12) receptor antagonists, which represented the aim of the present investigation. Methods and Results-In this post hoc analysis of the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, which randomized acute coronary syndrome patients to ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, patients (n=15 108) with available DM and CKD status were classified into 4 groups: DM+/CKD+ (n=1058), DM+/CKD- (n=2748), DM-/CKD+ (n=2160), and DM-/CKD- (n=9142). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. The primary safety end point was PLATO major bleeding. DM+/CKD+ patients had a higher incidence of the primary end point compared with DM-/CKD- patients (23.3% versus 7.1%; adjusted hazard ratio 2.22; 95% CI 1.88-2.63; P<0.001). Patients with DM+/CKD- and DM-/CKD+ had an intermediate risk profile. The same trend was shown for the individual components of the primary end point and for major bleeding. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor reduced the incidence of the primary end point consistently across subgroups (P-interaction=0.264), but with an increased absolute risk reduction in DM+/CKD+. The effects on major bleeding were also consistent across subgroups (P-interaction=0.288). Conclusions-In acute coronary syndrome patients, a gradient of risk was observed according to the presence or absence of DM and CKD, with patients having both risk factors at the highest risk. Although the ischemic benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel was consistent in all subgroups, the absolute risk reduction was greatest in patients with both DM and CKD.
Palavras-chave
acute coronary syndrome, chronic kidney disease, clopidogrel, diabetes mellitus, ticagrelor
Referências
- Angiolillo DJ, 2005, DIABETES, V54, P2430, DOI 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2430
- Angiolillo DJ, 2007, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V50, P1541, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.049
- Angiolillo DJ, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V64, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1170
- Angiolillo DJ, 2010, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V55, P1139, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.043
- Baber U, 2016, EUR HEART J, V37, P3440, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw378
- Baber U, 2015, CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE, V8, DOI 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001683
- Baber U, 2013, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V110, P118, DOI 10.1160/TH13-01-0004
- Barbieri L, 2016, VASC PHARMACOL, V79, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.vph.2015.10.006
- Bonello L, 2018, CIRCULATION, V138, P1582, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.032078
- Bruck K, 2016, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V27, P2135, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2015050542
- Bueno H, 2016, EUR HEART J-ACUTE CA, V5, P3, DOI 10.1177/2048872614565912
- Capodanno D, 2018, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V72, P2915, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.057
- Capodanno D, 2012, CIRCULATION, V125, P2649, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084996
- Chang H, 2010, THROMB RES, V125, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.006
- Clavijo LC, 2015, CARDIOVASC REVASCULA, V16, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.08.007
- Deharo P, 2015, INT J CARDIOL, V184, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.077
- Desai RJ, 2017, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V37, P1322, DOI 10.1002/phar.2018
- Dreisbach AW, 2008, EXPERT OPIN DRUG MET, V4, P1065, DOI [10.1517/17425250802273527, 10.1517/17425255.4.8.1065 ]
- Drexel H, 2014, DIABETES, V63, pA3
- Engwenyu LR, 2017, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V117, P201, DOI 10.1160/TH16-08-0594
- Erlinge D, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, P1968, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.068
- Faggioni M, 2017, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V69, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.047
- Franchi F, 2015, CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE, V8, DOI 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002760
- Franchi F, 2015, NAT REV CARDIOL, V12, P30, DOI 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.156
- Geiss LS, 2014, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V312, P1218, DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.11494
- Gremmel T, 2013, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V28, P2116, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gft103
- Heerspink HJL, 2016, CIRCULATION, V134, P752, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887
- Inker LA, 2014, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V63, P713, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416
- Inker LA, 2012, NEW ENGL J MED, V367, P20, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1114248
- James S, 2010, EUR HEART J, V31, P3006, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq325
- James S, 2010, CIRCULATION, V122, P1056, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933796
- Jankowski J, 2001, KIDNEY INT, V59, P1134, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590031134.x
- Jankowski V, 2009, SEMIN DIALYSIS, V22, P396, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00588.x
- Leblond F, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P326
- Ferreiro JL, 2011, CIRCULATION, V123, P798, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.913376
- Mangiacapra F, 2014, AM J CARDIOL, V113, P1124, DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.018
- Sherwood MW, 2014, J AM HEART ASSOC, V3, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.114.000849
- Storey RF, 2010, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V56, P1456, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.100
- Sweeny JM, 2017, J AM HEART ASSOC, V6, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.117.005650
- Tello-Montoliu A, 2013, J THROMB THROMBOLYS, V36, P14, DOI 10.1007/s11239-012-0828-1
- Ueno M, 2011, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V105, P730, DOI 10.1160/TH10-10-0652
- Vilahur G, 2016, CIRCULATION, V134, P1708, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024014
- Wallentin L, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V361, P1045, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327
- Wanner C, 2016, NEW ENGL J MED, V375, P323, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1515920, 10.1056/NEJMc1611290]