Correlation between scar assessment scales and orofacial myofunctional disorders in patients with head and neck burns

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SOC BRASILEIRA FONOAUDIOLOGIA
Citação
CODAS, v.31, n.5, article ID e20180238, 7p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: Verify the correlation between two scar assessment scales and the presence of orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMD) in patients with head and neck (H&N) burns. Methods: Participants of this study were 16 adult individuals with H&N full-thickness burns. Data were collected through assessment of mandibular range of movement and application of the following instruments: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Vancouver Scar Scale, and Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES). Results: Results showed moderate negative correlation between the variables deglutition, breathing, total score of the functions, total score on the OMES and scores on the scar assessment scales, indicating that the higher (more severe) the scores on these scales, the lower the scores on the items of the OMES (indicative of greater OMD severity). No correlations were observed between the items of the OMES and the POSAS Patient scale. Conclusion: Results suggest that there is correlation between scar severity in burn patients, measured through clinical scales, and presence of OMD. Patients who present scores indicative of H&N pathological scars should be immediately referred to orofacial myofunctional assessment.
Palavras-chave
Speech, Language and Hearing, Sciences, Burns, Neck, Head, Scar
Referências
  1. Ahuja RB, 2016, BURNS, V42, P639, DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2015.11.011
  2. Bianchini EMG, 2008, CRANIO, V26, P50, DOI 10.1179/crn.2008.007
  3. Bran GM, 2009, INT J MOL MED, V24, P283, DOI 10.3892/ijmm_00000231
  4. Brusselaers N, 2010, BURNS, V36, P1157, DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.016
  5. Burd Andrew, 2010, Semin Plast Surg, V24, P262, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1263068
  6. Clayton NA, 2017, BURNS, V43, pE7, DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.006
  7. Clayton NA, 2009, J BURN CARE RES, V30, P1039, DOI 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181bfb907
  8. Cruz BF, 2012, REV BRAS QUEIMADURAS, V11, P246
  9. de Felicio CM, 2010, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V74, P1230, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.07.021
  10. Dos Santos MC, 2014, REV BRAS QUEIMADURAS, V13, P26
  11. Felicio CM, 2009, INTERFACES MED ODONT
  12. Gankande TU, 2013, BURNS, V39, P1142, DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.014
  13. Greene CS, 2010, J AM DENT ASSOC, V141, P1086, DOI 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0337
  14. Gurol AP, 2010, J BURN CARE RES, V31, P429, DOI 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181db522c
  15. Guven E, 2010, ULUS TRAVMA ACIL CER, V16, P401
  16. Hamilton TJ, 2018, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V76, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.joms.2017.09.001
  17. Johnson D L, 1995, Int J Prosthodont, V8, P445
  18. Campos ACL, 2007, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V20, P51, DOI 10.1590/S0102-67202007000100010
  19. Linhares CB, 2016, REV BRAS CIR PLAST, V31, P95
  20. Makboul M, 2013, INDIAN J BURNS, V21, P50, DOI 10.4103/0971-653X.121883
  21. Ministerio da Saude. Departamento de Informatica do SUS. Informacoes de Saude, 2014, EP MORB INT SEG REG
  22. Mordjikian E, 2002, BURNS, V28, P802, DOI 10.1016/S0305-4179(02)00209-7
  23. Ogawa R, 2017, INT J MOL SCI, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijms18030606
  24. Rowan MP, 2015, CRIT CARE, V19, DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2
  25. Rumbach AF, 2009, J BURN CARE RES, V30, P901, DOI 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181b487e0
  26. Shrivastava P, 2010, INDIAN J PLAST SURG, V43, pS15, DOI 10.4103/0970-0358.70720
  27. Unsworth Carolyn A, 2004, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V2, P64, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-2-64
  28. Wang XQ, 2011, BURNS, V37, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.018
  29. WHO: World Health Organization, 2018, BURNS
  30. Wust KJ, 2006, J BURN CARE RES, V27, P86, DOI 10.1097/01.bcr.0000192267.55348.dd