Effect of Water Precautions on Otorrhea Incidence after Pediatric Tympanostomy Tube: Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Autores
SUBTIL, Joao
JARDIM, Ana
ARAUJO, Joao
MOREIRA, Carla
ECA, Tiago
MCMILLAN, Merlin
DIAS, Sara Simoes
CRUZ, Paulo Vera
PACO, Joao
Citação
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, v.161, n.3, p.514-521, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives Tympanostomy with ventilation tube insertion is the most common otologic surgery. Many surgeons recommend water precautions, although its utility is questioned. We aimed to investigate if water precautions reduce the rate of otorrhea after transtympanic tube insertion. Study Design Multicenter randomized controlled trial. Subjects and Methods A total of 244 children aged 2 to 10 years undergoing their first set of Shepard tubes for otitis media with effusion and concomitant adenoidectomy were randomized to 2 groups: 1 with ear protection during water exposure (ear plugs and headbands, n = 130) and 1 without (n = 114). Bathing or swimming with unprotected ears was considered the exposure event and incidence of otorrhea, the primary outcome. Outcomes were assessed during the 6-month follow-up period. Results In the water precaution group, 32% had at least 1 episode of otorrhea as compared with 22% in the unprotected group, which was not statistically significant (P = .09). Only 37% of the episodes of otorrhea in the protected group and 36% in the unprotected group had a temporal relation to water exposure (no difference, P = .81). Respectively, 56% and 52% of the episodes of otorrhea were in the context of upper respiratory tract infection. Global quality of life improved significantly, irrespective of whether water protection was prescribed. Conclusion The incidence of otorrhea was not different with or without prescription of ear protection during water exposure among children with tympanostomy tubes, which supports current guideline recommendations that routine water precautions are unnecessary in this population.
Palavras-chave
middle ear ventilation, otitis media with effusion, postoperative care, swimming, water precautions
Referências
  1. Araujo J, 2015, ACTA MEDICA PORT, V28, P501, DOI 10.20344/amp.5395
  2. Basu S, 2007, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V121, P9, DOI 10.1017/S0022215106003136
  3. Carbonell R, 2002, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V66, P281, DOI 10.1016/S0165-5876(02)00253-7
  4. Chow Y, 2007, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V71, P1543, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.06.001
  5. DALY KA, 1994, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V139, P1116, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116955
  6. Daniel M, 2012, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V76, P1416, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.013
  7. DEBRUYNE F, 1993, ORL J OTO-RHINO-LARY, V55, P226, DOI 10.1159/000276428
  8. FLEMING DW, 1987, PEDIATRICS, V79, P55
  9. Giannoni C, 2000, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V126, P1507
  10. Goldstein NA, 2005, LARYNGOSCOPE, V115, P324, DOI 10.1097/01.mlg.0000154742.33067.fb
  11. Hebert RL, 1998, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V124, P1118, DOI 10.1001/archotol.124.10.1118
  12. Hellstrom S, 2011, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V145, P383, DOI 10.1177/0194599811409862
  13. Kaur R, 2018, PEDIATRICS, V141, DOI 10.1542/peds.2017-4067
  14. Lameiras AR, 2018, ACTA MEDICA PORT, V31, P30, DOI 10.20344/amp.9457
  15. Lee D, 1999, LARYNGOSCOPE, V109, P536, DOI 10.1097/00005537-199904000-00003
  16. Mandel EM, 2008, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V72, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.12.008
  17. MANDEL EM, 1994, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V103, P713, DOI 10.1177/000348949410300909
  18. Moualed D, 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010375.pub2
  19. PARADISE JL, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P2066, DOI 10.1001/jama.263.15.2066
  20. PARKER GS, 1994, AM J OTOLARYNG, V15, P193, DOI 10.1016/0196-0709(94)90004-3
  21. Poss JM, 2008, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V134, P133, DOI 10.1001/archoto.2007.25
  22. Richards M, 2002, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V128, P776, DOI 10.1001/archotol.128.7.776
  23. Rosenfeld RM, 2016, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V154, pS1, DOI 10.1177/0194599815623467
  24. Rosenfeld RM, 2013, OTOLARYNG HEAD NECK, V149, pS1, DOI 10.1177/0194599813487302
  25. Rosenfeld RM, 2000, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V126, P585, DOI 10.1001/archotol.126.5.585
  26. Rovers MM, 2004, LANCET, V363, P465, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15495-0
  27. Salata JA, 1996, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V122, P276
  28. Schulz KF, 2010, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V340, DOI 10.1136/bmj.c332
  29. Steele DW, 2017, COMP EFFECTIVENESS R, V185
  30. Subtil J, 2018, BRAZ J OTORHINOLAR, V84, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.009
  31. Subtil J, 2018, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V111, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.022
  32. Tsao GJ, 2014, LARYNGOSCOPE, V124, P1513, DOI 10.1002/lary.24473
  33. van Dongen TMA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069062
  34. Varni JW, 2001, MED CARE, V39, P800, DOI 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006
  35. Varni JW, 1999, MED CARE, V37, P126, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003
  36. Varni JW, 2002, J BEHAV MED, V25, P175, DOI 10.1023/A:1014836921812
  37. Wilcox LJ, 2014, LARYNGOSCOPE, V124, P10, DOI 10.1002/lary.23993