Is High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Effective for the Treatment of Adenomyosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
41
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, v.27, n.2, p.332-343, 2020
Resumo
Study Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in reducing adenomyotic lesions, patients' pain and bleeding symptoms, and the impact on patients' quality of life. Data Source: A search was performed through PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Methods of Study Selection: All available studies published in the English language in the last 10 years that evaluated the effects of HIFU for adenomyosis. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed on data from homogeneous studies. Pooled results from the meta-analysis showed that after HIFU treatment for adenomyosis, a large effect was observed in reducing the uterine volume at 12 months (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.85), a significant reduction in dysmenorrhea at 3 months (SMD = 1.83) and 12 months (SMD = 2.37), and a significant improvement in quality of life at 6 months (SMD = 3.0) and 12 months (SMD = 2.75). Adverse reactions after HIFU were reported in 55.9% of patients. Conclusion: This review suggests a potential benefit for HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms; however, findings of the meta-analysis were based on fewer, nonuniform studies, which did not equally account for each specific symptom/parameter across the board. Results showed there appears to be a potential of HIFU in the treatment of adenomyosis-related symptoms. To date, there are no comparative and randomized clinical trials comparing the HIFU technique with other conservative treatment options. As yet, there are insufficient data regarding fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
Palavras-chave
High-intensity focused ultrasound, Adenomyosis, Systematic review
Referências
- Abbott JA, 2017, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V40, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006
- Bohlmann MK, 2014, GEBURTSH FRAUENHEILK, V74, P139, DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1360311
- Cheung VYT, 2018, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V46, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.002
- Coyne KS, 2017, CURR MED RES OPIN, V33, P193, DOI 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248382
- Di Donato N, 2014, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V181, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.016
- Dueholm M, 2018, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V51, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.016
- Dueholm M, 2017, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V96, P715, DOI 10.1111/aogs.13158
- Faraone Stephen V, 2008, P T, V33, P700
- Farquhar C, 2006, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V20, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.012
- Feng YJ, 2017, ULTRASON SONOCHEM, V36, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.022
- Gordts S, 2018, FERTIL STERIL, V109, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.006
- Hozo Stela Pudar, 2005, BMC Med Res Methodol, V5, P13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
- Lee JS, 2017, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V124, P18, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.14739
- Lee JS, 2015, ULTRASON SONOCHEM, V27, P682, DOI 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.033
- Liu XF, 2017, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V124, P40, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.14746
- Liu X, 2016, MEDICINE, V95, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000002443
- Long L, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P11701
- Luo DH, 2018, STAT METHODS MED RES, V27, P1785, DOI 10.1177/0962280216669183
- Moher D, 2015, SYST REV, V4, DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
- Naftalin J, 2014, HUM REPROD, V29, P473, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det451
- Ozdegirmenci O, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V95, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.009
- Park J, 2016, J KOREAN MED SCI, V31, P1279, DOI 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1279
- PRICE DD, 1983, PAIN, V17, P45, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4
- Rocha TP, 2018, REPROD SCI, V25, P480, DOI 10.1177/1933719118756754
- Rohatgi A, 2011, WEBPLOTDIGITIZER
- Sacks David, 2003, J Vasc Interv Radiol, V14, pS199
- Shui L, 2015, ULTRASON SONOCHEM, V27, P677, DOI 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.024
- Vannuccini Silvia, 2019, F1000Res, V8, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.17242.1
- Wang W, 2009, ACAD RADIOL, V16, P1416, DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.005
- Whiting Penny, 2003, BMC Med Res Methodol, V3, P25, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
- Zhang X, 2014, EUR J RADIOL, V83, P1607, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.008
- Zhang X, 2014, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V124, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.08.022
- Zhou M, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V95, P900, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.020