Association between Metabolic Disorders and Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of a Postulated Risk Factor with Rising Incidence

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MDPI
Citação
CANCERS, v.14, n.14, article ID 3483, 14p, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Simple Summary A potential relationship between cholangiocarcinoma and metabolic disorders has been suggested, but there is a lack of published data. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of metabolic disorders in a cohort of 122 patients with cholangiocarcinoma and report clinical outcomes. We found a prevalence of 42.6% of metabolic disorders. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with or without metabolic disorders, although there was a better survival in the subgroup of patients undergoing surgical resection. This indicates a need to better explore the association between cholangiocarcinoma in a metabolic background. Introduction and objectives: The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has been increasing globally. Although a concomitant increase in the incidence of metabolic disorders might suggest a causal relationship, the data are scarce. We aimed to describe the prevalence of metabolic disorders in patients with CCA and report the clinical features and outcomes. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study including patients with CCA. Patients were divided into: (1) past history of diabetes or/and overweight/obesity (""metabolic disorder group"") and (2) without any of these features (""non-metabolic-disorder group""). A Cox regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors. Results: 122 patients were included. In total, 36 (29.5%) had overweight/obesity, 24 (19.7%) had diabetes, and 8 (6.6%) had both. A total of 29 (23.8%) patients had resectable disease and received upfront surgery. A total of 104 (85.2%) received chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent disease. The overall survival of the cohort was 14.3 months (95% CI: 10.1-17.3). ECOG-PS 0 (p < 0.0001), resectable disease (p = 0.018) and absence of vascular invasion (p = 0.048) were independently associated with better prognosis. The ""metabolic disorder group"" (n = 52) had a median survival of 15.5 months (95% CI 10.9-33.9) vs. 11.5 months (95% CI 8.4-16.5) in the ""non-metabolic-disorder group"" (n = 70) (HR: 1.10; 95% CI 0.62-1.94). Patients with resectable disease in the ""metabolic group"" had longer survival than patients in the ""non-metabolic group"" (43.4 months (95% CI 33.9-NR) vs. 21.8 months (95% CI 8.6-26.9); HR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.59). Conclusion: Metabolic disorders are frequent among CCA patients. Underlying metabolic comorbidities may be associated with prognosis in resectable CCA. There is a need to explore the mechanism that drives CCA carcinogenesis in a metabolic background.
Palavras-chave
liver cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, obesity
Referências
  1. Anstee QM, 2013, NAT REV GASTRO HEPAT, V10, P330, DOI 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41
  2. Banales JM, 2020, NAT REV GASTRO HEPAT, V17, P557, DOI 10.1038/s41575-020-0310-z
  3. Bekki Y, 2021, FRONT ONCOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.776863
  4. Berres ML, 2010, DIGEST DIS, V28, P192, DOI 10.1159/000282085
  5. Boyce CJ, 2010, AM J ROENTGENOL, V194, P623, DOI 10.2214/AJR.09.2590
  6. Chaiteerakij R, 2013, HEPATOLOGY, V57, P648, DOI 10.1002/hep.26092
  7. Chan KM, 2018, BMC GASTROENTEROL, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12876-018-0912-x
  8. Da Fonseca L.G., 2021, ANN HEPATOL, V24, P100376, DOI [10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100376, DOI 10.1016/J.AOHEP.2021.100376]
  9. De Lorenzo S, 2020, CANCERS, V12, DOI 10.3390/cancers12113182
  10. Djiogue S, 2013, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V20, pR1, DOI 10.1530/ERC-12-0324
  11. Eslam M, 2020, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V158, P1999, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312
  12. Fava G, 2008, CANCER RES, V68, P6752, DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6682
  13. Foerster F, 2022, J HEPATOL, V76, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.007
  14. Garcia-Jimenez C, 2014, J MOL ENDOCRINOL, V52, pR51, DOI 10.1530/JME-13-0152
  15. Ghidini M, 2021, EXPERT REV GASTROENT, V15, P999, DOI 10.1080/17474124.2021.1946393
  16. Graffy PM, 2019, RADIOLOGY, V293, P334, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019190512
  17. Huang YN, 2017, ONCOTARGET, V8, P100570, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.20141
  18. Izquierdo-Sanchez L, 2022, J HEPATOL, V76, P1109, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.010
  19. Khan SA, 2019, LIVER INT, V39, P19, DOI 10.1111/liv.14095
  20. Kuriyama K, 2020, CANCER SCI, V111, P1969, DOI 10.1111/cas.14421
  21. Lamarca A, 2021, LANCET ONCOL, V22, P690, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00027-9
  22. Molinari M., 2021, ANN SURG, V2, pe065, DOI [10.1097/AS9.0000000000000065, DOI 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000065]
  23. Nagtegaal ID, 2020, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V76, P182, DOI 10.1111/his.13975
  24. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, 2010, HEPATOLOGY, V52, P774, DOI 10.1002/hep.23719
  25. Oh DY, 2022, J CLIN ONCOL, V40, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.4_suppl.378
  26. Pfister D, 2021, NATURE, V592, P450, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03362-0
  27. Surapaneni PK, 2019, J CLIN ONCOL, V37, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.288
  28. Valle JW, 2016, ANN ONCOL, V27, pv28, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdw324
  29. Valle J, 2010, NEW ENGL J MED, V362, P1273, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
  30. Welzel TM, 2007, INT J CANCER, V120, P638, DOI 10.1002/ijc.22283
  31. Welzel TM, 2007, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V5, P1221, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.05.020
  32. Wijarnpreecha K, 2020, J GASTROINTEST LIVER, V29, P629, DOI 10.15403/jgld-2990
  33. Xiong JP, 2018, CANCER MANAG RES, V10, P3849, DOI 10.2147/CMAR.S175628
  34. Yang H, 2019, FRONT ONCOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00854