Converted and Upgraded Maps Programmed in the Newer Speech Processor for the First Generation of Multichannel Cochlear Implant

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citação
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, v.34, n.7, p.1193-1200, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To identify the technological contributions of the newer version of speech processor to the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant and the satisfaction of users of the new technology. Among the new features available, we focused on the effect of the frequency allocation table, the T-SPL and C-SPL, and the preprocessing gain adjustments (adaptive dynamic range optimization). Study Design: Prospective exploratory study. Setting: Cochlear implant center at hospital. Patients: Cochlear implant users of the Spectra processor with speech recognition in closed set. Seventeen patients were selected between the ages of 15 and 82 and deployed for more than 8 years. Interventions: The technology update of the speech processor for the Nucleus 22. Main Outcome Measures: To determine Freedom's contribution, thresholds and speech perception tests were performed with the last map used with the Spectra and the maps created for Freedom. To identify the effect of the frequency allocation table, both upgraded and converted maps were programmed. One map was programmed with 25dB T-SPL and 65dB C-SPL and the other map with adaptive dynamic range optimization. To assess satisfaction, SADL and APHAB were used. Results: All speech perception tests and all sound field thresholds were statistically better with the new speech processor; 64.7% of patients preferred maintaining the same frequency table that was suggested for the older processor. The sound field threshold was statistically significant at 500, 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 Hz with 25dB T-SPL/65dB C-SPL. Regarding patient's satisfaction, there was a statistically significant improvement, only in the subscale of speech in noise abilities and phone use. Conclusion: The new technology improved the performance of patients with the first generation of multichannel cochlear implant.
Palavras-chave
Adult, Audiometry, Cochlear implant, Conversion, Speech discrimination tests, Speech perception, Speech processor
Referências
  1. Bento RF, 2004, REV BRAS OTORRINOLAR, V70, P632, DOI 10.1590/S0034-72992004000500009
  2. Bureau Internacional doCAudio Phonologie Bureau Internacional doCAudio Phonologie, AUD CLASS HEAR IMP R
  3. Costa MJ, 1997, ACTA AWHO, V16, P164
  4. COX RM, 1995, EAR HEARING, V16, P176, DOI 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005
  5. Cox RM, 1999, EAR HEARING, V20, P306, DOI 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00004
  6. Davidson LS, 2010, OTOL NEUROTOL, V31, P1310, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181eb320c
  7. Dodd MC, 2005, OTOL NEUROTOL, V26, P635, DOI 10.1097/01.mao.0000178147.91139.75
  8. Firszt JB, 2004, EAR HEARING, V25, P375, DOI 10.1097/01.AUD.0000134552.22205.EE
  9. Patrick James F, 2006, Trends Amplif, V10, P175, DOI 10.1177/1084713806296386
  10. Goffi-Gomez M, 2004, ARQUIVOS INT OTORRIN, V8, P303
  11. Jethanamest D, 2010, OTOL NEUROTOL, V31, P1242, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2063e
  12. KOU BS, 1994, J OTOLARYNGOL, V23, P8
  13. Lassaletta L, 2006, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V263, P267, DOI 10.1007/s00405-005-0987-1
  14. Parkinson AJ, 1998, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V41, P1073
  15. Santarelli R, 2009, OTOL NEUROTOL, V30, P304, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181967a19
  16. Valimaa TT, 2008, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V128, P984, DOI 10.1080/00016480701793727
  17. WEWERS ME, 1990, RES NURS HEALTH, V13, P227, DOI 10.1002/nur.4770130405
  18. Zhao F, 2008, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V33, P427, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01773.x