Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure titration on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in anesthetized horses

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_IDA_Effects_of_positive_end_expiratory_pressure_titration_on_2013.PDF (307.94 KB)
Citações na Scopus
35
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
AMBROSIO, Aline M.
SOUTO, Maria T. M. R.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, v.40, n.6, p.564-572, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective To assess if positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics, without hemodynamic impairment in horses during anesthesia. Design Prospective, randomized study. Animals Thirteen isoflurane-anesthetized healthy horses. Methods After 60 minutes of anesthesia with spontaneous breathing, mechanical ventilation was initiated with an inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1: 2, PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O, tidal volume of 10-20 mL kg(-1) and respiratory rate adjusted to maintain normo-capnia. Constant PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O was continued (control group; n - 6) or titrated (PEEP group; n = 7) by increasing and decreasing PEEP from 5 to 20 cmH(2)O at 15-minute intervals. The horses were instrumented with an arterial catheter to measure blood pressure and allow collection of blood for pH and blood gas analysis and a Swan-Ganz catheter for measurement of cardiac output (CO) using thermodilution. Cardiopulmonary assessment was recorded before PEEP titration and after 15 minutes at each PEEP value. Results In the PEEP group, static compliance (range) (Cst 278-463 mL cmH(2)O(-1)) was significantly higher and the shunt fraction ((Q) over dot(s)/(Q) over dot(t) 7-20%) and the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference [P(A-a) O-2 95-325 mmHg] were significantly lower than in the control group [Cst of 246-290 mL cmH(2)O (1), (Q) over dot(s)/(Q) over dot(t) of 16-19%, P(A-a)O-2 of 253-310 mmHg; p < 0.05]. CO (mean +/- SEM) was lower in the PEEP group (23 +/- 2 L minute(-1)) at 20 cmH(2)O PEEP than in the control group (26 +/- 4 L minute(-1), p < 0.05), with no significant changes in heart rate, blood pressure or central venous pressure. Conclusions PEEP titration significantly improved gas exchange and lung compliance, with a small decrease in CO at the highest PEEP level.
Palavras-chave
anesthesia, horses, mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure, recruitment maneuvers
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5289
Referências
  1. Albaiceta GM, 2004, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V170, P1066, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200312-1644OC
  2. Ambrosio AM, 2012, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V117, P1322, DOI 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827542aa
  3. Araos JD, 2012, AM J VET RES, V73, P2013, DOI 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.2013
  4. Badet M, 2009, RESP CARE, V54, P847, DOI 10.4187/002013209793800448
  5. Bringewatt T, 2010, VET REC, V167, P1002, DOI 10.1136/vr.c4172
  6. Canfran S, 2012, VET J, V194, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.02.021
  7. DAY TK, 1995, VET SURG, V24, P266, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1995.tb01330.x
  8. Dyson A, 2007, AM J PHYSIOL-HEART C, V293, pH526, DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00052.2007
  9. Edner A, 2005, VET ANAESTH ANALG, V32, P136, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00190.x
  10. Eskaros SM, 2010, MILLERS ANESTHESIA, P1411
  11. Fantoni DT, 2013, VET ANAESTH ANALG, V40, P367, DOI 10.1111/vaa.12029
  12. HALL LW, 1968, BRIT J ANAESTH, V40, P560, DOI 10.1093/bja/40.8.560
  13. Hedenstierna G, 1989, Acta Chir Scand Suppl, V550, P152
  14. Hedenstierna G, 2012, COMPR PHYSIOL, V2, P69, DOI 10.1002/cphy.c080111
  15. Hickling KC, 2001, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V163, P69
  16. HOLT JP, 1968, AM J PHYSIOL, V215, P704
  17. Hopster K, 2011, VET ANAESTH ANALG, V38, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00606.x
  18. Hubbell JAE, 2011, BMC VET RES, V7, DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-7-23
  19. LACHMANN B, 1992, INTENS CARE MED, V18, P319, DOI 10.1007/BF01694358
  20. Lucangelo U, 2005, RESP CARE, V50, P65
  21. Lucangelo Umberto, 2005, Respir Care, V50, P55
  22. Malbouisson Luiz Marcelo Sá, 2008, Rev Bras Anestesiol, V58, P73, DOI 10.1590/S0034-70942008000100011
  23. Marntell S, 2005, VET ANAESTH ANALG, V32, P338, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00199.x
  24. Nielsen J, 2006, INTENS CARE MED, V32, P952, DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0176-8
  25. NYMAN G, 1989, EQUINE VET J, V21, P274
  26. NYMAN G, 1990, EQUINE VET J, V22, P317
  27. Papadakos PJ, 2007, CRIT CARE CLIN, V23, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.12.001
  28. Rimensberger PC, 1999, CRIT CARE MED, V27, P1946, DOI 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00038
  29. Rothen HU, 1996, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V40, P524
  30. Schroeder R. A., 2010, MILLERS ANESTHESIA, P1267
  31. Schurmann P, 2008, PFERDEHEILKUNDE, V24, P236
  32. Staffieri F, 2009, EQUINE VET J, V41, P747, DOI 10.2746/042516409X416198
  33. STRANDBERG A, 1987, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V31, P21
  34. SWANSON CR, 1988, AM J VET RES, V49, P539
  35. Tugrul S, 2005, CRIT CARE MED, V33, P995, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000163402.29767.7B
  36. Wettstein D, 2006, AM J VET RES, V67, P152, DOI 10.2460/ajvr.67.1.152
  37. WILSON DV, 1991, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V199, P917
  38. WILSON DV, 1990, AM J VET RES, V51, P734
  39. Wolff K, 2010, PFERDEHEILKUNDE, V26, P706

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/08