Evaluating a Speech-Language Pathology Technology

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
SPINARDI-PANES, Ana Carulina
LOPES-HERRERA, Simone Aparecida
MAXIMINO, Luciana Paula
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, v.20, n.3, p.269-271, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: The creation of new educational strategies based on technology is the essence of telehealth. This innovative learning is an alternative to promote integration and improve the professional practices in speech-language pathology (SLP). The objective of this study was to evaluate an SLP technology designed for distance learning. Materials and Methods: The survey selected fourth-year SLP students (n=60) from three public universities in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The experimental group (EG) contained 10 students from each university (n=30), and the remaining students formed the control group (CG). Initially, both groups answered a preprotocol questionnaire, and the EG students received the technology, the recommendations, and the deadline to explore the material. In the second stage all students answered the postprotocol questionnaire in order to evaluate the validity and the learning of the technology contents. Results: The comparison between the CG students showed that their performance worsened in the majority in comparison with the EG students, who showed an improved performance. Conclusions: Therefore, this study concluded that the technology instrument actually responded to the population studied and is recommended to complement traditional teaching.
Palavras-chave
cost-minimizations, distance learning, telehealth
Referências
  1. Blasca WQ, 2006, SALUSVITA, V25, P113
  2. Blasca Wanderléia Quinhoneiro, 2010, Rev. CEFAC, V12, P1017
  3. Blasca WQ, 2005, AN 20 ENC INT AUD SA, V66-67
  4. Conselho Federal de Fonoaudiologia, FON NUM REG
  5. De Muth JE, 2006, AM J PHARM EDUC, V70
  6. Feeg VD, 2005, J NURS EDUC, V44, P381
  7. Gordon Judith S, 2004, J Dent Educ, V68, P361
  8. Le TT, 2010, J ASTHMA, V47, P245, DOI 10.3109/02770900903560209
  9. Ministerio da EducacAo, BRAS E MECSITEMA REG
  10. Spinardi Ana Carulina Pereira, 2009, Pro Fono, V21, P249
  11. Spinardi ACP, 2009, THESIS U SAO PAULO B