Validation of the Duke Religion Index: DUREL (Portuguese Version)

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_LEAO_Validation_of_the_Duke_Religion_Index_DUREL_(Portuguese_2012.PDF (160.76 KB)
Citações na Scopus
143
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Editora
SPRINGER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
LUCCHETTI, Giancarlo
LUCCHETTI, Alessandra Lamas Granero
PERES, Mario F.
MOREIRA-ALMEIDA, Alexander
KOENIG, Harold G.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, v.51, n.2, p.579-586, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The purpose of the current study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Duke Religion Index (PDUREL) in a community setting. PDUREL was translated and adapted for administration to 383 individuals from a population-based study of low-income community-dwelling adults. The PDUREL intrinsic subscale and total scores demonstrated high internal consistency (alphas ranging from 0.733 for the total scale score to 0.758 for the intrinsic subscale). Correlations among the DUREL subscales were also examined for evidence of discriminant validity. Correlations were ranging from 0.36 to 0.46, indicating significant overlap between the scales without marked redundancy. PDUREL is a reliable and valid scale. The availability of a comprehensive, but brief measure of religiousness can help to study the role of religiousness in health by researchers from countries that speak the Portuguese language.
Palavras-chave
Religion and medicine, Epidemiology, Psychometrics
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5509
Referências
  1. Cotton S., 2006, J GEN INTERNAL MED, V21, P5
  2. Floriano Petterson de Jesus, 2007, J. bras. psiquiatr., V56, P162, DOI 10.1590/S0047-20852007000300002
  3. Gallup G, 1990, RELIG AM 1900
  4. Gillum RF, 2008, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V18, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.015
  5. Goncalves AMDS, 2009, REV PSIQUIATR CLIN, V36, P10, DOI 10.1590/S0101-60832009000100002
  6. Koenig H, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P885
  7. Koenig H. G., 2001, HDB RELIG HLTH
  8. Koenig HG, 2009, CAN J PSYCHIAT, V54, P283
  9. Koenig HG, 2007, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V15, P282, DOI 10.1097/01.JGP.0000246875.93674.0c
  10. Lawler-Row KA, 2009, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V14, P43, DOI 10.1177/1359105308097944
  11. Leão Frederico Camelo, 2007, Rev. psiquiatr. clín., V34, P54, DOI 10.1590/S0101-60832007000700008
  12. Lucchetti Giancarlo, 2010, J. Bras. Nefrol., V32, P128, DOI 10.1590/S0101-28002010000100020
  13. Moreira-Almeida A, 2006, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V28, P242, DOI 10.1590/S1516-44462006000300018
  14. Moreira-Almeida A, 2008, REV PSIQUIATR CLIN, V35, P31, DOI 10.1590/S0101-60832008000100006
  15. Panzini Raquel Gehrke, 2005, Psicol. estud., V10, P507, DOI 10.1590/S1413-73722005000300019
  16. Pargament K. I., 2001, PSYCHOL RELIG COPING
  17. Sherman AC, 2000, SUPPORT CARE CANCER, V8, P102, DOI 10.1007/s005200050023
  18. Storch E. A., 2004, PASTORAL PSYCHOL, V53, P175, DOI 10.1023/B:PASP.0000046828.94211.53
  19. Storch EA, 2004, PSYCHOL REP, V94, P993
  20. Sulmasy DP, 2009, CHEST, V135, P1634, DOI 10.1378/chest.08-2241
  21. Tarakeshwar N, 2006, J PALLIAT MED, V9, P646, DOI 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.646
  22. Yohannes AM, 2008, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V23, P735, DOI 10.1002/gps.1968

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq