ROBOTIC ASSISTED VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
COLEGIO BRASILEIRO CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-CBCD
Autores
Citação
ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, v.36, article ID e1783, 6p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with less blood loss and faster functional recovery. However, the benefits of robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) are unknown. AIMS: To compare RDP versus LDP for surgical treatment of benign lesions, pre-malignant and borderline malignant pancreatic neoplasias. METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing LDP with RDP. Main outcomes were overall morbidity and overall costs. Secondary outcomes were pancreatic fistula (PF), infectious complications, readmission, operative time (OT) and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: Thirty patients submitted to LDP and 29 submitted to RDP were included in the study. There was no difference regarding preoperative characteristics. There was no difference regarding overall complications (RDP - 72,4% versus LDP - 80%, p=0,49). Costs were superior for patients submitted to RDP (RDP=US$ 6,688 versus LDP=US$ 6,149, p=0,02), mostly due to higher costs of surgical materials (RDP=US$ 2,364 versus LDP=1,421, p=0,00005). Twenty-one patients submitted to RDP and 24 to LDP developed pancreatic fistula (PF), but only 4 RDP and 7 LDP experienced infectious complications associated with PF. OT (RDP=224 min. versus LDP=213 min., p=0.36) was similar, as well as conversion to open procedure (1 RDP and 2 LDP). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative morbidity of robotic distal pancreatectomy is comparable to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. However, the costs of robotic distal pancreatectomy are slightly higher.
Palavras-chave
Pancreatectomy, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Costs and Cost Analysis, Laparoscopy, Morbidity
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/57938
Referências
  1. Alfieri S, 2020, SURG INNOV, V27, P11, DOI 10.1177/1553350619868112
  2. Anaya DA, 2020, ANN SURG ONCOL, V27, P1726, DOI 10.1245/s10434-020-08254-7
  3. Bassi C, 2017, SURGERY, V161, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
  4. Belotto M, 2021, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V34, DOI 10.1590/0102-672020210003e1604
  5. Benizri EI, 2014, J ROBOT SURG, V8, P125, DOI 10.1007/s11701-013-0438-8
  6. Björnsson B, 2020, BRIT J SURG, V107, P1281, DOI 10.1002/bjs.11554
  7. Butturini G, 2015, SURG ENDOSC, V29, P3163, DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3
  8. Chan KS, 2021, SURGERY, V170, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.046
  9. Cuschieri A, 1996, ANN SURG, V223, P280, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00008
  10. da Costa AC, 2022, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V35, DOI 10.1590/0102-672020220002e1683
  11. De Pastena M, 2021, SURG ENDOSC, V35, P1420, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-07528-1
  12. de Rooij T, 2019, ANN SURG, V269, P2, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979
  13. Di Franco G, 2022, SURG ENDOSC, V36, P651, DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08332-1
  14. Diener MK, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1514, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7
  15. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  16. Duran H, 2014, INT J MED ROBOT COMP, V10, P280, DOI 10.1002/rcs.1569
  17. Eckhardt S, 2016, DIGEST SURG, V33, P406, DOI 10.1159/000444269
  18. Esposito A, 2022, SURG ENDOSC, V36, P7025, DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08997-8
  19. GAGNER M, 1994, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V8, P408, DOI 10.1007/BF00642443
  20. Giannone F, 2021, CANCERS, V13, DOI 10.3390/cancers13246268
  21. Kamarajah SK, 2019, HPB, V21, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.020
  22. Kang CM, 2011, SURG ENDOSC, V25, P2004, DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1504-1
  23. Kassite I, 2019, SURG ENDOSC, V33, P353, DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9
  24. Klompmaker S, 2021, ANN SURG, V274, pE966, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003659
  25. Liu Q, 2018, INT J SURG, V55, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.024
  26. Lof S, 2021, BRIT J SURG, V108, P188, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znaa039
  27. McMillan MT, 2017, JAMA SURG, V152, P327, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4755
  28. Melvin WS, 2003, J LAPAROENDOSC ADV A, V13, P33, DOI 10.1089/109264203321235449
  29. Muller P C, 2022, Ann Surg Open, V3, pe111, DOI 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111
  30. Nassour I, 2017, ANN SURG ONCOL, V24, P3725, DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6062-5
  31. Partelli S, 2021, AM J SURG, V222, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.066
  32. Romero-Hernandez F, 2022, CANCERS, V14, DOI 10.3390/cancers14225625
  33. Tosoian JJ, 2015, JAMA SURG, V150, P152, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2346
  34. van Hilst J, 2019, LANCET GASTROENTEROL, V4, P199, DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4
  35. Waters JA, 2010, SURGERY, V148, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.027

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/24
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/35
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/37