Major clinical features of synostotic occipital plagiocephaly: mechanisms of cranial deformations

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MATUSHITA_Major_clinical_features_of_synostotic_occipital_plagiocephaly_mechanisms_2014.PDF (2.8 MB)
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
SPRINGER
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, v.30, n.7, p.1217-1224, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The clinical diagnosis of most common single-suture craniosynostosis is easily set, based on the stereotype of deformities and knowledge of the mechanisms of cranial deformations. However, synostosis of unilateral lambdoid suture, probably due to its lower incidence and similarity with other non-synostotic deformities affecting the posterior portion of the skull, makes its clinical diagnosis more difficult and imprecise. The aim of this study is to evaluate the most easily and accurate clinical characteristics to be recognized in the synostotic occipital plagiocephaly. This study consisted of clinical evaluation of eight patients with synostotic occipital plagiocephaly, whose diagnosis was further corroborated by computed tomography. We identified the following: unilateral occipital flattening in eight out of eight patients (100 %), bulging of ipsilateral mastoid process in eight out of eight (100 %), ""edge effect"" of ipsilateral lambdoid suture in eight out of eight (100 %), inferior deviation of the ear in eight out of eight (100 %), ""Dumbo"" ears in eight out of eight (100 %), horizontal slant of the bimastoid line in seven out of eight (87.5 %), tilt of the head viewed from behind in seven out of eight (87.5 %), trapezoidal contour of the skull in top view in six out of eight (75 %), contralateral parietal bossing in six out of eight (75 %), and bossing of the contralateral forehead three out of eight (37.5 %). The most important clinical features specific to the clinical diagnosis of synostotic occipital plagiocephaly, not present in the positional posterior plagiocephaly, were bulging of the ipsilateral mastoid process, edge effect of the synostotic lambdoid suture, tilt of the head, and slant of the bimastoid line viewed from behind, inferior deviation of the ear, and contralateral parietal bossing.
Palavras-chave
Plagiocephaly, Synostotic occipital plagiocephaly, Unilateral lambdoid, Synostosis, Craniosynostosis, Skull deformity, Mechanisms
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/7298
Referências
  1. BERTELSEN TORSTEIN I., 1958, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SUPPL, V51, P1
  2. Brenner DJ, 2001, AM J ROENTGENOL, V176, P289
  3. David DJ, 2000, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V53, P367, DOI 10.1054/bjps.2000.3329
  4. DELASHAW JB, 1989, J NEUROSURG, V70, P159, DOI 10.3171/jns.1989.70.2.0159
  5. Dias MS, 1996, PEDIATR NEUROSURG, V24, P61, DOI 10.1159/000121018
  6. Ehret FW, 2004, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V41, P13, DOI 10.1597/02-053
  7. Fearon JA, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, P132
  8. FRENCH LR, 1990, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V43, P69, DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90058-W
  9. Frush DP, 2003, PEDIATRICS, V112, P951, DOI 10.1542/peds.112.4.951
  10. Hall P, 2004, BRIT MED J, V328, P19, DOI 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.19
  11. Huang MHS, 1996, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V98, P765, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199610000-00001
  12. Hutchison BL, 2004, PEDIATRICS, V114, P970, DOI 10.1542/peds.2003-0668-F
  13. Smartt JM, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V120, P993, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000278043.28952.e8
  14. Kane AA, 1996, PEDIATRICS, V97, P877
  15. KNUDSON HW, 1960, AMER J ROENTGENOL RA, V84, P454
  16. Lin KY, 1997, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V15
  17. Liu Y, 2008, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V19, P132, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181655314
  18. MUAKKASSA KF, 1984, J NEUROSURG, V61, P340, DOI 10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0340
  19. Mulliken JB, 1999, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V103, P371, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00003
  20. National Cancer Institute, 2012, RAD RISKS PED COMP T
  21. Pearce MS, 2012, LANCET, V380, P499, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0
  22. Pople IK, 1996, PEDIATR NEUROSURG, V25, P1, DOI 10.1159/000121088
  23. Rekate HL, 1998, J NEUROSURG, V89, P24, DOI 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0024
  24. Rogers GF, 2011, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V22, P9, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f6c313
  25. Ruiz Ramon L, 2004, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, V16, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.coms.2004.08.007
  26. SHILLITO J, 1968, PEDIATRICS, V41, P829
  27. SHUPER A, 1985, AM J DIS CHILD, V139, P85
  28. Smartt JM, 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, P303, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95cd8
  29. Sun PP, 1999, PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, P219
  30. Vander Kolk CA, 1994, PLAST CLIN N AM, V21, P575

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/15