Outcomes of adrenal-sparing surgery or total adrenalectomy in phaeochromocytoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: an international retrospective population-based study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
130
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Autores
CASTINETTI, Frederic
QI, Xiao-Ping
WALZ, Martin K.
MAIA, Ana Luiza
SANSO, Gabriela
PECZKOWSKA, Mariola
HASSE-LAZAR, Kornelia
LINKS, Thera P.
DVORAKOVA, Sarka
TOLEDO, Rodrigo A.
Citação
LANCET ONCOLOGY, v.15, n.6, p.648-655, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background The prevention of medullary thyroid cancer in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndrome has demonstrated the ability of molecular diagnosis and prophylactic surgery to improve patient outcomes. However, the other major neoplasia associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, phaeochromocytoma, is not as well characterised in terms of occurrence and treatment outcomes. In this study, we aimed to systematically characterise the outcomes of management of phaeochromocytoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Methods This multinational observational retrospective population-based study compiled data on patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 from 30 academic medical centres across Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Patients were included if they were carriers of germline pathogenic mutations of the RET gene, or were first-degree relatives with histologically proven medullary thyroid cancer and phaeochromocytoma. We gathered clinical information about patients' RET genotype, type of treatment for phaeochromocytoma (ie, unilateral or bilateral operations as adrenalectomy or adrenal-sparing surgery, and as open or endoscopic operations), and postoperative outcomes (adrenal function, malignancy, and death). The type of surgery was decided by each investigator and the timing of surgery was patient driven. The primary aim of our analysis was to compare disease-free survival after either adrenal-sparing surgery or adrenalectomy. Findings 1210 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 were included in our database, 563 of whom had phaeochromocytoma. Treatment was adrenalectomy in 438 (79%) of 552 operated patients, and adrenal-sparing surgery in 114 (21%). Phaeochromocytoma recurrence occurred in four (3%) of 153 of the operated glands after adrenal-sparing surgery after 6-13 years, compared with 11 (2%) of 717 glands operated by adrenalectomy (p=0.57). Postoperative adrenal insufficiency or steroid dependency developed in 292 (86%) of 339 patients with bilateral phaeochromocytoma who underwent surgery. However, 47 (57%) of 82 patients with bilateral phaeochromocytoma who underwent adrenal-sparing surgery did not become steroid dependent. Interpretation The treatment of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2-related phaeochromocytoma continues to rely on adrenalectomies with their associated Addisonian-like complications and consequent lifelong dependency on steroids. Adrenal-sparing surgery, a highly successful treatment option in experienced centres, should be the surgical approach of choice to reduce these complications.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Alesina PF, 2012, LANGENBECK ARCH SURG, V397, P233, DOI 10.1007/s00423-011-0851-2
  2. Asari R, 2006, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V141, P1199, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1199
  3. Baghai M, 2002, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V137, P682, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.682
  4. Borrello MG, 1995, ONCOGENE, V11, P2419
  5. de Graaf JS, 1999, EUR J SURG, V165, P535
  6. DONISKELLER H, 1993, HUM MOL GENET, V2, P851, DOI 10.1093/hmg/2.7.851
  7. Eng C, 1996, NEW ENGL J MED, V335, P943
  8. Eng C, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V276, P1575, DOI 10.1001/jama.276.19.1575
  9. ENG C, 1995, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V43, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1995.tb01903.x
  10. Imai T, 2013, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V168, P683, DOI 10.1530/EJE-12-1106
  11. Kloos RT, 2009, THYROID, V19, P565, DOI 10.1089/thy.2008.0403
  12. Lallier M, 1998, J PEDIATR SURG, V33, P846, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90656-X
  13. Machens A, 2013, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V168, P307, DOI 10.1530/EJE-12-0919
  14. MULLIGAN LM, 1993, NATURE, V363, P458, DOI 10.1038/363458a0
  15. Neumann HPH, 1999, BRIT J SURG, V86, P94
  16. Neumann Hartmut P. H., 1995, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), V274, P1149, DOI 10.1001/jama.274.14.1149
  17. Stolk RF, 2013, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V98, P1100, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-3669
  18. Walz MK, 2004, SURG CLIN N AM, V84, P743, DOI 10.1016/j.suc.2004.01.003
  19. Wells SA, 2013, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V98, P3149, DOI 10.1210/jc.2013-1204