Substantia nigra echogenicity and imaging of striatal dopamine transporters in Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
25
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
PEDROSO, Jose Luiz
FELICIO, Andre C.
BRAGA-NETO, Pedro
BATISTA, Ilza Rosa
BARSOTTINI, Orlando Graziani Povoas
BORGES, Vanderci
FERRAZ, Henrique Ballalai
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, v.20, n.5, p.477-481, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Approximately 10% of patients with a presumed diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) remain misdiagnosed despite recent advances in neuroimaging. The current study addresses the use of transcranial sonography and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 to evaluate the echogenicity of the substantia nigra (SN) and the density of striatal presynaptic dopamine transporters, respectively, in a sample of 20 PD patients (13 males and 7 females) and 9 healthy subjects. The median age of the PD patients was 62 years. The median age at disease onset was 56 years, and the median disease duration was 5 years. The SN echogenic area was larger in PD patients than healthy subjects. The cut-off value of 0.22 cm(2) for the SN echogenic area was associated with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity for the diagnosis of PD. Striatal and putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was lower in PD patients than healthy subjects. The cut-off value of 0.90 for the striatal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was associated with 100% sensitivity and an 89% specificity for the diagnosis of PD, and the cut-off value of 0.76 for putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding was associated with an 85% sensitivity and an 89% specificity. The size of the SN echogenic area did not correlate with the degree of striatal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding in PD patients. In conclusion, both SN hyperechogenicity and decreased striatal or putaminal Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 binding constitute surrogate markers for differentiating PD patients from healthy individuals with a slightly higher diagnostic specificity of Tc-99m-TRODAT-1 SPECT.
Palavras-chave
Parkinson's disease, Substantia nigra echogenicity, Transcranial sonography, SPELT, Dopamine transporter
Referências
  1. Behnke S, 2007, NEUROIMAGE, V34, P1054, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.010
  2. Behnke S, 2009, NEUROIMAGE, V47, P1237, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.072
  3. Berg D, 2011, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V68, P932, DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2011.141
  4. Berg D, 2001, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V50, P463, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01190-8
  5. Berg D, 2002, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V59, P999, DOI 10.1001/archneur.59.6.999
  6. Berg D, 2008, LANCET NEUROL, V7, P1044, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70239-4
  7. Bor-Seng-Shu E, 2010, ACTA NEUROCHIR, V152, P2085, DOI 10.1007/s00701-010-0736-0
  8. Bor-Seng-Shu E, 2012, TRANSCRANIAL SONOGRA, V10, P242
  9. Busse K, 2012, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V83, P441, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301719
  10. CHANG LT, 1978, IEEE T NUCL SCI, V25, P638, DOI 10.1109/TNS.1978.4329385
  11. Chiu YL, 2012, CLIN NUCL MED, V37, P899, DOI 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825b271f
  12. Doepp F, 2008, MOVEMENT DISORD, V23, P405, DOI 10.1002/mds.21861
  13. Fernandes RDL, 2011, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V69, P892, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2011000700008
  14. Gaenslen A, 2008, LANCET NEUROL, V7, P417, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70067-X
  15. Go CL, 2012, J ULTRAS MED, V31, P191
  16. Hughes AJ, 2002, BRAIN, V125, P861, DOI 10.1093/brain/awf080
  17. Liepelt I, 2011, NEUROBIOL AGING, V32, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.10.004
  18. Lobsien E, 2012, MOVEMENT DISORD, V27, P450, DOI 10.1002/mds.24070
  19. Mahlknecht P, 2013, NEURODEGENER DIS, V12, P212, DOI 10.1159/000348595
  20. Mahlknecht P, 2012, MOVEMENT DISORD, V27, P1192, DOI 10.1002/mds.25080
  21. Pavese N, 2009, BBA-MOL BASIS DIS, V1792, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.10.003
  22. Pedroso JL, 2011, NEUROSCI LETT, V504, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.09.006
  23. Pedroso JL, 2013, PARKINSONISM RELAT D, V19, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.04.019
  24. Pedroso JL, 2012, J NEUROL SCI, V319, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2012.05.015
  25. Ruprecht-Dorfler P, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V18, P416, DOI 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00035-6
  26. Spiegel J, 2006, BRAIN, V129, P1188, DOI 10.1093/brain/awl042
  27. Stockner H, 2007, MOVEMENT DISORD, V22, P414, DOI 10.1002/mds.21344
  28. Stockner H, 2012, MOVEMENT DISORD, V27, P1180, DOI 10.1002/mds.25102
  29. Stockner H, 2009, MOVEMENT DISORD, V24, P1906, DOI 10.1002/mds.22483
  30. van de Loo S, 2010, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V81, P1087, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2009.196352
  31. Walter U, 2007, ULTRASOUND MED BIOL, V33, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.021
  32. Walter U, 2007, BRAIN, V130, P1799, DOI 10.1093/brain/awm017
  33. Weise D, 2009, MOVEMENT DISORD, V24, P1669, DOI 10.1002/mds.22665