The concepts of representation and information in explanatory theories of human behavior

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, v.5, article ID 1034, 8p, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Focusing in experimental study of human behavior, this article discusses the concepts of information and mental representation aiming the integration of their biological, computational, and semantic aspects. Assuming that the objective of any communication process is ultimately to modify the receiver's state, the term correlational information is proposed as a measure of how changes occurring in external world correlate with changes occurring inside an individual. Mental representations are conceptualized as a special case of information processing in which correlational information is received, recorded, but also modified by a complex emergent process of associating new elements. In humans, the acquisition of information and creation of mental representations occurs in a two-step process. First, a sufficiently complex brain structure is necessary to establishing internal states capable to co-vary with external events. Second, the validity or meaning of these representations must be gradually achieved by confronting them with the environment. This contextualization can be considered as part of the process of ascribing meaning to information and representations. The hypothesis introduced here is that the sophisticated psychological constructs classically associated with the concept of mental representation are essentially of the same nature of simple interactive behaviors. The capacity of generating elaborated mental phenomena like beliefs and desires emerges gradually during evolution and, in a given individual, by learning and social interaction.
Palavras-chave
information, mental representation, human behavior
Referências
  1. Adami C, 2012, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1256, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06422.x
  2. BAK P, 1987, PHYS REV LETT, V59, P381, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381
  3. Beggs JM, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P11167
  4. Bezzi M, 2007, BIOSYSTEMS, V89, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.04.009
  5. Caticha N, 2011, ADV COMPLEX SYST, V14, P711, DOI 10.1142/S0219525911003190
  6. Cummins R., 1996, REPRESENTATIONS TARG
  7. Cummins R., 1989, MEANING MENTAL REPRE
  8. El Boustani S, 2009, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000519
  9. Floridi L, 2005, PHILOS PHENOMEN RES, V70, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00531.x
  10. Fodor J. A., 2000, MIND DOESNT WORK WAY
  11. Gros C., 2013, COMPLEX ADAPTIVE DYN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-36586-7, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36586-7]
  12. Hidalgo J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P10095, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1319166111
  13. Jensen G, 2013, J EXP ANAL BEHAV, V100, P408, DOI 10.1002/jeab.49
  14. Kanai R, 2012, CURR BIOL, V22, pR392, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.033
  15. Karnani M, 2009, P R SOC A, V465, P2155, DOI 10.1098/rspa.2009.0063
  16. Kryklywy JH, 2013, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V252, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.010
  17. Land MF, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC B, V369, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0045
  18. Mineka S, 2002, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V52, P927, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01669-4
  19. Moriguchi Y, 2014, FRONT PSYCHOL, V5, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00388
  20. Noelle DC, 2012, J INTEGR NEUROSCI, V11, P453, DOI 10.1142/S021963521250029X
  21. Nunez P. L., 2014, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, DOI [10.1016/j.clinph.2014.04.003, DOI 10.1016/J.CLINPH.2014.04.003]
  22. Oztop E, 2013, NEUROSCI LETT, V540, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.005
  23. Prochnow D, 2013, SOC NEUROSCI-UK, V8, P448, DOI 10.1080/17470919.2013.812536
  24. Ramos R. T., 2012, AJOB NEUROSCI, V3, P52, DOI [10.1080/21507740.2012.721856, DOI 10.1080/21507740.2012.721856]
  25. Ramos RT, 2011, NEW IDEAS PSYCHOL, V29, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.12.001
  26. Regenbogen C, 2012, COGNITION EMOTION, V26, P995, DOI 10.1080/02699931.2011.631296
  27. Seed A, 2012, PHILOS T R SOC B, V367, P2743, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0222
  28. Serrano MA, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.078701
  29. SHANNON CE, 1948, AT&T TECH J, V27, P623
  30. Shen WB, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P1497, DOI 10.1007/s11434-012-5565-5
  31. Acharya Sourya, 2012, J Nat Sci Biol Med, V3, P118, DOI 10.4103/0976-9668.101878
  32. STICH S, 1992, MIND, V101, P243, DOI 10.1093/mind/101.402.243
  33. Tedjakumala SR, 2013, J EXP BIOL, V216, P2985, DOI 10.1242/jeb.086629
  34. Tenenbaum JB, 2011, SCIENCE, V331, P1279, DOI 10.1126/science.1192788
  35. Tononi G, 2008, BIOL BULL-US, V215, P216
  36. Vakarelov O, 2014, MIND MACH, V24, P327, DOI 10.1007/s11023-013-9318-2
  37. Vakarelov O., 2010, KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGY, V23, P193, DOI 10.1007/s12130-010-9109-5
  38. Wang CL, 2011, ENTROPY-SWITZ, V13, P254, DOI 10.3390/e13010254
  39. Ward BD, 2008, J NEUROSCI METH, V167, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.027
  40. Wellman HM, 2001, CHILD DEV, V72, P655, DOI 10.1111/1467-8624.00304