Potential of 2-Hydroxy-3-Phenylsulfanylmethyl-[1,4]-Naphthoquinones against Leishmania (L.) infantum: Biological Activity and Structure-Activity Relationships

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
40
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
SANTOS, Isabela O.
SCHMIDT, Thomas J.
BORBOREMA, Samanta E. T.
FERREIRA, Vitor F.
ROCHA, David R.
TEMPONE, Andre G.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.9, n.8, article ID e105127, 7p, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Naphtoquinones have been used as promising scaffolds for drug design studies against protozoan parasites. Considering the highly toxic and limited therapeutic arsenal, the global negligence with tropical diseases and the elevated prevalence of co-morbidities especially in developing countries, the parasitic diseases caused by various Leishmania species (leishmaniasis) became a significant public health threat in 98 countries. The aim of this work was the evaluation of antileishmanial in vitro potential of thirty-six 2-hydroxy-3-phenylsulfanylmethyl-[1,4]-naphthoquinones obtained by a three component reaction of lawsone, the appropriate aldehyde and thiols adequately substituted, exploiting the in situ generation of o-quinonemethides (o-QM) via the Knoevenagel condensation. The antileishmanial activity of the naphthoquinone derivatives was evaluated against promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum and their cytotoxicity was verified in mammalian cells. Among the thirty-six compounds, twenty-seven were effective against promastigotes, with IC50 values ranging from 8 to 189 mu M; fourteen compounds eliminated the intracellular amastigotes, with IC50 values ranging from 12 to 65 mu M. The compounds containing the phenyl groups at R-1 and R-2 and with the fluorine substituent at the phenyl ring at R-2, rendered the most promising activity, demonstrating a selectivity index higher than 15 against amastigotes. A QSAR (quantitative structure activity relationship) analysis yielded insights into general structural requirements for activity of most compounds in the series. Considering the in vitro antileishmanial potential of 2-hydroxy-3-phenylsulfanylmethyl-[1,4]-naphthoquinones and their structure-activity relationships, novel lead candidates could be exploited in future drug design studies for leishmaniasis.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Alvar J, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671
  2. Camara CA, 2008, AN ACAD BRAS CIENC, V80, P329, DOI 10.1590/S0001-37652008000200011
  3. Carneiro PF, 2012, BIOORGAN MED CHEM, V20, P4995, DOI 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.06.027
  4. Chirac P, 2006, LANCET, V367, P1560, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68672-8
  5. Croft SL, 2011, CLIN MICROBIOL INFEC, V17, P1478, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03630.x
  6. CROFT SL, 1992, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V30, P827, DOI 10.1093/jac/30.6.827
  7. de Rezende LCD, 2013, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V23, P4583, DOI 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.06.033
  8. Di Rosso ME, 2013, TOXICOL IN VITRO, V27, P2094, DOI 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.08.002
  9. Ferreira SB, 2010, ARCH PHARM, V343, P81, DOI 10.1002/ardp.200900162
  10. Kovacic P, 2014, J APPL TOXICOL, V34, P810, DOI 10.1002/jat.2980
  11. Lezama-Davila CM, 2012, BIOL PHARM BULL, V35, P1761, DOI 10.1248/bpb.b12-00419
  12. Lu SF, 2000, J MED CHEM, V43, P1611, DOI 10.1021/jm990599h
  13. Mukherjee P, 2009, INT J ANTIMICROB AG, V34, P596, DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.08.007
  14. Nixon GL, 2013, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V68, P977, DOI 10.1093/jac/dks504
  15. Park BK, 2001, ANNU REV PHARMACOL, V41, P443, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.443
  16. Ray S, 1998, MOL PHARMACOL, V54, P994
  17. Reimao JQ, 2012, EXP PARASITOL, V130, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.01.010
  18. Ribeiro GA, 2013, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V68, P789, DOI 10.1093/jac/dks498
  19. Riffel A, 2002, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V35, P811, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2002000700008
  20. Salas CO, 2011, CURR MED CHEM, V18, P144
  21. Schmidt TJ, 2002, QUANT STRUCT-ACT REL, V21, P276, DOI 10.1002/1521-3838(200208)21:3<276::AID-QSAR276>3.0.CO;2-S
  22. Schmidt TJ, 2012, CURR MED CHEM, V19, P2128
  23. Schuck DC, 2013, MALARIA J, V12, DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-234
  24. Sharma A, 2013, EUR J MED CHEM, V59, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.10.052
  25. Su JC, 2010, CELL BIOCHEM FUNCT, V28, P695, DOI 10.1002/cbf.1710
  26. TADA H, 1986, J IMMUNOL METHODS, V93, P157, DOI 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90183-3
  27. Tempone AG, 2011, PLANTA MED, V77, P572, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1250663
  28. Voak AA, 2014, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V58, P370, DOI 10.1128/AAC.01459-13