Recomendações para atividade física e saúde: consensos, controvérsias e ambiguidades
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
18
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PAN AMER HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Autores
Citação
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, v.36, n.3, p.164-170, 2014
Resumo
Objective. To compare the results of physical activity (PA) classification according to five international guidelines (American College of Sports Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Advisory Committee on International Physical Activity Questionnaire, World Health Organization, and European Union). Methods. Cross-sectional study with 52 779 adults of both sexes, living in state capitals and the Federal District, selected using probability sampling. Data about duration, intensity, and frequency of weekly PA were obtained from a yearly survey conducted by the Health Ministry of Brazil (Risk and Protection Factors for Chronic Diseases Telephone Surveillance System-VIGITEL). Results. The percent of participants classified as inactive by the five recommendations was similar. Among those who reported having engaged in PA, 45% were classified in the same activity level by all five guidelines (24.8% as insufficiently active, 10.6% as active, and 9.1% as very active). For the additional 55% who reported having engaged in PA, different classifications were obtained, ranging from insufficiently active to very active depending on the guideline. Conclusions. Nuances in the criteria used for each guideline translated into differences in classification of PA. Even though the overall goals of all guidelines are the same, the lack of agreement regarding the minimum recommended amount of PA impacts the development of policies to promote PA.
Palavras-chave
Motor activity, sedentary lifestyle, health surveys, interview, Brazil
Referências
- Ainsworth BE, 2000, MED SCI SPORTS EXERC, V32, P498
- Baltar VT, ANALISE CONCORDANCIA
- Bauman AE, 2012, LANCET, V380, P258, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1
- Blair SN, 2004, AM J CLIN NUTR, V79, P913
- Boyle SE, 2010, QUAL LIFE RES, V19, P943, DOI 10.1007/s11136-010-9659-8
- Brasil Ministerio da Saude, 2012, POL NAC AT BAS PNAB
- Brasil Ministerio da Saude, 2012, VIG BRAS 2011 VIG FA
- Brasil Ministerio da Saude, 2007, VIG BRAS 2006 VIG FA
- Brasil Ministerio da Saude, 2011, VIG FAT RISC PROT DO
- Bull F. C., 2010, PHYS ACTIVITY GUIDEL
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PHYS ACT EV REC
- Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 2013, PHYS ACTIVITY HLTH
- Eriksson J, 1997, DIABETOLOGIA, V40, P125
- Haskell WL, 2007, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V39, P1423, DOI 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27
- Institute of Medicine (IOM), DIET REF INT EN CARB
- Instituto de Desporto de Portugal, OR UN EUR ACT FIS
- International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), GUID DAT PROC AN INT
- Kallings LV, 2010, FYSISK AKTIVITET REC
- McAuley E, 2006, ANN BEHAV MED, V31, P99, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_14
- Morimoto T, 2006, QUAL LIFE RES, V15, P537, DOI 10.1007/s11136-005-3033-2
- Moura Erly Catarina, 2008, Rev. bras. epidemiol., V11, P20
- Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2008, PHYS ACT GUID AM
- PATE RR, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V273, P402, DOI 10.1001/jama.273.5.402
- Talbot LA, 2007, PREV MED, V45, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.014
- Thompson D, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, P43
- US Department of Health and Human Services, 1996, PHYS ACT HLTH REP SU
- Warren TY, 2010, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V42, P879, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c3aa7e
- White SM, 2009, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, V7, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-7-10
- World Health Organization, 2010, GLOB REC PHYS ACT HL