HISTOMORPHOMETRIC BONE ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FEMUR
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
SOUZA, Marcio Passini Goncalves De
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.23, n.2, p.103-106, 2015
Resumo
Objective: To determine whether there is a difference on the bone architecture in patients with femoral neck fracture compared to patients with intertrochanteric fractures and assess the importance of aging on bone microarchitecture in patients with proximal femoral fracture. Methods: Biopsy of the iliac crest was made in seventeen patients between 55 and 90 years old who were admitted to the emergency room with fractures of the proximal end of the femur. After a small fragment was removed, we made a histomorphometric analysis of it. Results: There was no significant difference between patients with femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture in structural parameters, formation and resorption. Comparing age groups we also did not find any significant change between the groups in the parameters volume and trabecular separation. Conclusion: There are no difference in the morphometric parameters analyzed between the different types of fracture and age is not a significant factor in the alteration of these parameters.
Palavras-chave
Bone and bones, Osteoporosis, Hip fractures
Referências
- Anderson JJB, 2012, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V97, P4531, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-1407
- Barger-Lux M Janet, 2002, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V13, P297, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200210000-00002
- Blain H, 2008, BONE, V43, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2008.07.236
- CUMMINGS SR, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V263, P665, DOI 10.1001/jama.263.5.665
- DARBY AJ, 1981, CALCIFIED TISSUE INT, V33, P199, DOI 10.1007/BF02409438
- Dennison EM, 2010, J DEV ORIG HLTH DIS, V1, P142, DOI 10.1017/S2040174409990146
- Emaus N, 2006, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V163, P441, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwj055
- FAULKNER KG, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, P1211
- GARDEN RS, 1964, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V46, P630
- Gnudi S, 2002, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V13, P69, DOI 10.1007/s198-002-8340-2
- JENSEN JS, 1980, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V51, P803, DOI 10.3109/17453678008990877
- KELLY PJ, 1991, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V72, P808
- RIGGS BL, 1986, J CLIN INVEST, V77, P1487, DOI 10.1172/JCI112462
- Lopez LM, 2014, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V6
- Machado MM, 2014, BONE, V67, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.001
- MAZESS RB, 1982, CLIN ORTHOPAEDICS, V165, P239
- Milovanovic P, 2012, BONE, V50, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2011.09.044
- POLLITZER WS, 1989, AM J CLIN NUTR, V50, P1244
- REHMAN MTA, 1994, J CLIN PATHOL, V47, P529, DOI 10.1136/jcp.47.6.529
- Reis LM, 1998, THESIS I CIENCIAS BI
- RIGGS BL, 1981, J CLIN INVEST, V67, P328, DOI 10.1172/JCI110039
- Rubinacci A, 2012, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V23, P1967, DOI 10.1007/s00198-011-1795-7
- Salamanna F, 2013, BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-47
- SLOVIK DM, 1981, NEW ENGL J MED, V305, P372, DOI 10.1056/NEJM198108133050704