GUSTAVO FAIBISCHEW PRADO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/09 - Laboratório de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
40 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 40
- 3rd GUIDELINE FOR PERIOPERATIVE CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY(2017) GUALANDRO, D. M.; YU, P. C.; CARAMELLI, B.; MARQUES, A. C.; CALDERARO, D.; FORNARI, L. S.; PINHO, C.; FEITOSA, A. C. R.; POLANCZYK, C. A.; ROCHITTE, C. E.; JARDIM, C.; VIEIRA, C. L. Z.; NAKAMURA, D. Y. M.; IEZZI, D.; SCHREEN, D.; ADAM, Eduardo L.; D'AMICO, E. A.; LIMA, M. Q.; BURDMANN, E. A.; PACHON, E. I. M.; BRAGA, F. G. M.; MACHADO, F. S.; PAULA, F. J.; CARMO, G. A. L.; FEITOSA-FILHO, G. S.; PRADO, G. F.; LOPES, H. F.; FERNANDES, J. R. C.; LIMA, J. J. G.; SACILOTTO, L.; DRAGER, L. F.; VACANTI, L. J.; ROHDE, L. E. P.; PRADA, L. F. L.; GOWDAK, L. H. W.; VIEIRA, M. L. C.; MONACHINI, M. C.; MACATRAO-COSTA, M. F.; PAIXAO, M. R.; OLIVEIRA JR., M. T.; CURY, P.; VILLACA, P. R.; FARSKY, P. S.; SICILIANO, R. F.; HEINISCH, R. H.; SOUZA, R.; GUALANDRO, S. F. M.; ACCORSI, T. A. D.; MATHIAS JR., W.
- Comparação entre medidas objetivas do tabagismo e tabagismo autodeclarado em pacientes com asma ou DPOC: será que nossos pacientes dizem a verdade?(2015) STELMACH, Rafael; FERNANDES, Frederico Leon Arrabal; CARVALHO-PINTO, Regina Maria; ATHANAZIO, Rodrigo Abensur; RACHED, Samia Zahi; PRADO, Gustavo Faibischew; CUKIER, AlbertoObjective: Smoking prevalence is frequently estimated on the basis of self-reported smoking status. That can lead to an underestimation of smoking rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between self-reported smoking status and that determined through the use of objective measures of smoking at a pulmonary outpatient clinic. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 144 individuals: 51 asthma patients, 53 COPD patients, 20 current smokers, and 20 never-smokers. Smoking status was determined on the basis of self-reports obtained in interviews, as well as through tests of exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and urinary cotinine. Results: All of the asthma patients and COPD patients declared they were not current smokers. In the COPD and asthma patients, the median urinary cotinine concentration was 167 ng/mL (range, 2-5,348 ng/mL) and 47 ng/mL (range, 5-2,735 ng/mL), respectively (p < 0.0001), whereas the median eCO level was 8 ppm (range, 0-31 ppm) and 5 ppm (range, 2-45 ppm), respectively (p < 0.05). In 40 (38%) of the patients with asthma or COPD (n = 104), there was disagreement between the self-reported smoking status and that determined on the basis of the urinary cotinine concentration, a concentration > 200 ng/mL being considered indicative of current smoking. In 48 (46%) of those 104 patients, the self-reported non-smoking status was refuted by an eCO level > 6 ppm, which is also considered indicative of current smoking. In 30 (29%) of the patients with asthma or COPD, the urinary cotinine concentration and the eCO level both belied the patient claims of not being current smokers. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that high proportions of smoking pulmonary patients with lung disease falsely declare themselves to be nonsmokers. The accurate classification of smoking status is pivotal to the treatment of lung diseases. Objective measures of smoking could be helpful in improving clinical management and counseling.
conferenceObject Heart rate and ventilation in a group of burned sugar cane cutters (Brazil): Estimative of particulate matter (PM2,5) exposure load(2012) COZZA, Izabela; NAMBU, Danilo; FERNANDES, Frederico; BUSSACOS, Marcos; PACELI, Renato; PRADO, Gustavo; TERRA-FILHO, Mario; SANTOS, UbiratanbookPart Tabagismo: Impactos na Saúde, Prevenção e Tratamento(2016) SANTOS, Ubiratan de Paula; PRADO, Gustavo Faibischew; MARTINS, Stella Regina; LOMBARDI, Elisa Maria SiqueirabookPart Tramboembolismo Pulmonar(2016) PRADO, Gustavo FaibischewconferenceObject Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Lung Cancer: Report of 6 Cases(2020) FREITAS, L. V. de; SERRA, J. P.; NAJAS, G. F.; PRADO, G. F.; KAWASSAKI, A. M.; TAKAGAKI, T. Y.; GABRIELLI, F.; JUNIOR, G. C.; OLIVEIRA, M. R.; KAIRALLA, R. A.; BALDI, B. G.bookPart Doenças Respiratórias Ocupacionais(2016) SANTOS, Ubiratan de Paula; LOMBARDI, Elisa Maria Siqueira; PRADO, Gustavo Faibischew- Reply from the author: Erratum and discussion on anti-oxidant enzymes(2014) PRADO, Gustavo Faibischew; TERRA-FILHO, Mario; SANTOS, Ubiratan de Paula
bookPart Avaliação pré-operatória do paciente candidato à ressecção pulmonar de tumores torácicos(2021) PRADO, Gustavo Faibischew; TOUFEN JUNIOR, Carlos; DIDIER NETO, Fernando Moacyr Fragoso- Management of lung nodules in Brazil-assessment of realities, beliefs and attitudes: a study by the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery (SBCT), the Brazilian Thoracic Society (SBPT) and the Brazilian College of Radiology (CBR)(2018) TSUKAZAN, Maria Teresa Ruiz; TERRA, Ricardo Mingarini; DETTERBECK, Frank; SANTORO, Ilka Lopes; HOCHHEGGER, Bruno; MEIRELLES, Gustavo de Souza Portes; FORTUNATO, Gustavo; PRADO, Gustavo FaibischewBackground: Pulmonary nodules are common; some are inconsequential while others are malignant. Management of solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) in Brazil appears to be highly variable, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. Assessment of the variability and the association with the degree of availability of resources can provide a foundation for development of clinical guidelines for management of SPN specific for the Brazilian setting. Methods: A web-based survey was developed by thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists and radiologists to evaluate SPN perception and management. This survey was sent to their respective national societies members and answers collected between August and December 2016. That included multiple choice questions regarding age, specialty, SPN management, accessibility to exams and interventional procedures characterizing public (SUS) and supplementary private working settings. Results: A total of 461 questionnaires were answered. More than half of participants live in cities with over one million people. Specialties were reasonable equilibrated with 43.5% radiologists, 33.5% thoracic surgeons, 20.3% pulmonologists and 2.6% others. Most of the respondents work in both public and private sector (72.7%). Private has a similar reality compared to well-developed nations regarding exams accessibility and interventions. SUS setting has a significant variability access according to the participants. CT is only easily available in 31.9% of cases, PET-CT is easily available in 24.4%, bronchoscopy is easily available for 42.8%, transthoracic needle biopsy is only easily available in 13.9% and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) biopsy is not available in 19.5%. When there is a probability of malignancy of 50% or higher, 46.5% of participants would be comfortable recommending surgical biopsy. When the probability is higher than 10%, only 36.9% would be comfortable following up radiologically. Conclusions: Brazil has a very different setting for public and private patients regarding exams accessibility and management options. That might explain why participants have a higher tendency to choose interventional diagnosis and explains why current guidelines may not be applicable to developing countries reality.