HENRIQUE ANTONIO BERWANGER DE AMORIM CABRITA
Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Proposal for a new clinical test for diagnosing lateral hip snapping,(2014) CABRITAA AMORIM, Henrique Antonio Berwanger de; GURGELA, Henrique Melo de Campos; MARQUES, Ricardo; SANTOS, Leandro Emilio Nascimento; VICENTEA, José Ricardo Negreiros; LEONHARDTA, Marcos de Camargo; EJNISMANA, Leandro; CROCI, Alberto TesconiLateral hip snapping is a nosological entity that is often unknown to many orthopedists and even to some hip surgery specialists. It comprises palpable and/or audible snapping on the lateral face of the hip that is sometimes painful, caused by muscle-tendon friction on the greater trochanter during flexion and extension of the coxofemoral joint. In the following, we describe a new test for diagnosing lateral hip snapping, which is eminently clinical.
- Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty With and Without a Computer-Assisted System: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study(2014) GURGEL, Henrique M. C.; CROCI, Alberto T.; CABRITA, Henrique A. B. A.; VICENTE, Jose Ricardo N.; LEONHARDT, Marcos C.; RODRIGUES, Joao CarlosIn a study of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty, 20 hips were operated on using imageless navigation and 20 hips were operated on using the conventional method. The correct position of the acetabular component was evaluated with computed tomography, measuring the operative anteversion and the operative inclination and determining the cases inside Lewinnek's safe zone. The results were similar in all the analyses: a mean anteversion of 17.4 degrees in the navigated group and 14.5 degrees in the control group (P = .215); a mean inclination of 41.7 degrees and 42.2 degrees (P = .633); a mean deviation from the desired anteversion (15 degrees) of 5.5 degrees and 6.6 degrees (P = .429); a mean deviation from the desired inclination of 3 degrees and 3.2 degrees = .783); and location inside the safe zone of 90% and 80% (P = .661). The acetabular component position's tomography analyses were similar whether using the imageless navigation or performing it conventionally.