OMAR ASDRUBAL VILCA MEJIA
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
56 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 56
- Difference Between Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time and Aortic Cross-Clamping Time as a Predictor of Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting(2024) JUCA, Fabiano Goncalves; FREITAS, Fabiane Leticia de; GONCHAROV, Maxim; PES, Daniella de Lima; JUCA, Maria Eduarda Coimbra; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; JATENE, Fabio B.; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal VilcaIntroduction: Along with cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross -clamping time is directly related to the risk of complications after heart surgery. The influence of the time difference between cardiopulmonary bypass and cross -clamping times (TDC-C) remains poorly understood. Objective: To assess the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass time in relation to cross -clamping time on immediate results after coronary artery bypass grafting in the Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (REPLICCAR) II. Methods: Analysis of 3,090 patients included in REPLICCAR II database was performed. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons outcomes were evaluated (mortality, kidney failure, deep wound infection, reoperation, cerebrovascular accident, and prolonged ventilation time). A cutoff point was adopted, from which the increase of this difference would affect each outcome. Results: After a cutoff point determination, all patients were divided into Group 1 (cardiopulmonarybypasstime <140 min.,TDC-C < 30 min.), Group 2 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.), Group 3 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), and Group 4 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.). After univariate logistic regression, Group 2 showed significant association with reoperation (odds ratio: 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.66), stroke (odds ratio: 3.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.99-7.63), kidney failure (odds ratio: 1.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.74), and in -hospital mortality (odds ratio: 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.60). Conclusion: TDC-C serves as a predictive factor for complications following coronary artery bypass grafting. We strongly recommend that future studies incorporate this metric to improve the prediction of complications.
- EuroSCORE II and the importance of a local model, InsCor and the future SP-SCORE(2014) LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; MASSOTI, Maria Raquel B.; JATENE, Fabio B.Introduction: The most widely used model for predicting mortality in cardiac surgery was recently remodeled, but the doubts regarding its methodology and development have been reported. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the EuroSCORE II to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery at our institution. Methods: One thousand consecutive patients operated on coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery, between October 2008 and July 2009, were analyzed. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Calibration was performed by correlation between observed and expected mortality by Hosmer Lemeshow. Discrimination was calculated by the area under the ROC curve. The performance of the EuroSCORE II was compared with the EuroSCORE and InsCor (local model). Results: In calibration, the Hosmer Lemeshow test was inappropriate for the EuroSCORE II (P=0.0003) and good for the EuroSCORE (P=0.593) and InsCor (P=0.184). However, the discrimination, the area under the ROC curve for EuroSCORE II was 0.81 [95% CI (0.76 to 0.85), P<0.001], for the EuroSCORE was 0.81 [95% CI (0.77 to 0.86), P<0.001] and for InsCor was 0.79 [95% CI (0.74-0.83), P<0.001] showing up properly for all. Conclusion: The EuroSCORE II became more complex and resemblance to the international literature poorly calibrated to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery at our institution. These data emphasize the importance of the local model.
- Pre-validation Study of the Brazilian Version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) as a Safety Tool in Cardiothoracic Surgery(2017) NINA, Vinicius Jose da Silva; JATENE, Fabio B.; SEVDALIS, Nick; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; BRANDAO, Carlos Manuel de Almeida; MONTEIRO, Rosangela; CANEO, Luiz Fernando; SCUDELLER, Paula Gobi; MENDES, Augusto Dimitry; MENDES, Vinicius Giuliano; ROMANO, Bellkiss WilmaIntroduction: Most risk stratification scores used in surgery do not include external and non-technical factors as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Objective: The present study aimed to translate and adapt transculturally the Brazilian version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) questionnaire, which was developed to capture the self-perception of each member of the surgical team regarding the disruptions that may contribute to error and obstruction of safe surgical flow. Methods: A universalist approach was adopted to evaluate the conceptual equivalence of items and semantics, which included the following stages: (1) translation of the questionnaire into Portuguese; (2) back translation into English; (3) panel of experts to draft the preliminary version; and (4) pre-test for evaluation of verbal comprehension by the target population of 43 professionals working in cardiothoracic surgery. Results: The questionnaire was translated into Portuguese and its final version with 29 items obtained 89.6% approval from the panel of experts. The target population evaluated all items as easy to understand. The mean overall clarity and verbal comprehension observed in the pre-test reached 4.48 +/- 0.16 out of the maximum value of 5 on the psychometric Likert scale. Conclusion: Based on the methodology used, the experts' analysis and the results of the pre-test, it is concluded that the essential stages of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of DiSI to the Portuguese language were satisfactorily fulfilled in this study.
- Current Impact of Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Sao Paulo State(2020) BORGOMONI, Gabrielle Barbosa; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; ORLANDI, Bianca Maria Maglia; GONCHAROV, Maxim; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; CONTE, Pedro Henrique; OLIVEIRA, Marco Antonio Praca; FIORELLI, Alfredo Inacio; JUNIOR, Orlando Petrucci; TIVERON, Marcos Grandim; DALLAN, Luis Alberto de Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliBackground: Previous results on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have generated difficulties in choosing the best treatment for each patient undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery (CABG) in the current context. Objective: Evaluate the current impact of CPB in CABG in Sao Paulo State. Methods: A total of 2905 patients who underwent CABG were consecutively analyzed in 11 Sao Paulo State centers belonging to the Sao Paulo Registry of Cardiovascular Surgery (REPLICCAR) I. Perioperative and follow-up data were included online by trained specialists in each hospital. Associations of the perioperative variables with the type of procedure and with the outcomes were analyzed. The study outcomes were morbidity and operative mortality. The expected mortality was calculated using EuroSCORE II (ESII). The values of p <5% were considered significant. Results: There were no significant differences concerning the patients' age between the groups (p=0.081). 72.9% of the patients were males. Of the patients, 542 underwent surgery without CPB (18.7%). Of the preoperative characteristics, patients with previous myocardial infarction (p=0.005) and ventricular dysfunction (p=0.031) underwent surgery with CPB. However, emergency or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV patients underwent surgery without CPB (p<0.001). The ESII value was similar in both groups (p=0.427). In CABG without CPB, the radial graft was preferred (p<0.001), and in CABG with CPB the right mammary artery was the preferred one (p<0.001). In the postoperative period, CPB use was associated with reoperation for bleeding (p=0.012). Conclusion: Currently in the REPLICCAR, reoperation for bleeding was the only outcome associated with the use of CPB in CABG.
- Continuous quality improvement programme in cardiovascular surgery: the Latin American perspective(2016) MEJIA, Omar A.; LISBOA, Luiz A.; JATENE, Fabio B.
- Quality improvement program in Latin America decreases mortality after cardiac surgery: a before-after intervention study(2022) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; BORGOMONI, Gabrielle Barbosa; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; MIOTO, Bruno Mahler; ACCORSI, Tarso Augusto Duenhas; LIMA, Eduardo Gomes; SOEIRO, Alexandre de Matos; LIMA, Felipe Gallego; BRANDAO, Carlos Manuel de Almeida; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto FerreiraBackground: The current challenge of cardiac surgery (CS) is to improve outcomes in adverse scenarios. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a quality improvement program (QIP) on hospital mortality in the largest CS center in Latin America.Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: before (Jan 2013-Dec 2015, n = 3534) and after establishment of the QIP (Jan 2017-Dec 2019, n = 3544). The QIP consisted of the implementation of 10 central initiatives during 2016. The procedures evaluated were isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), mitral valve surgery, aortic valve surgery, combined mitral and aortic valve surgery, and CABG associated with heart valve surgery. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to adjust for inequality in patients' preoperative characteristics before and after the implementation of QIP. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to predict hospital mortality and validated using discrimination and calibration metrics.Results: The PMS paired two groups using 5 variables, obtaining 858 patients operated before (non-QIP) and 858 patients operated after the implementation of the QIP. When comparing the QIP versus Non-QIP group, there was a shorter length of stay in all phases of hospitalization. In addition, the patients evolved with less anemia (P = 0.001), use of intra-aortic balloon pump (P = 0.003), atrial fibrillation (P = 0.001), acute kidney injury (P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (P = 0.011), sepsis (P = 0.046), and hospital mortality (P = 0.001). In the multiple model, among the predictors of hospital mortality, the lack of QIP increased the chances of mortality by 2.09 times.Conclusion: The implementation of a first CS QIP in Latin America was associated with a reduction in length of hospital stay, complications and mortality after the cardiac surgeries analyzed.
- Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery and Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Insulin-Dependent Diabetic Patients(2015) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio Biscegli
- Age, Creatinine and Ejection Fraction Score in Brazil: Comparison with InsCor and the EuroSCORE(2015) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; MATRANGOLO, Bruna La Regina; TITINGER, David Provenzale; FARIA, Leandro Batisti de; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; GALAS, Filomena Regina Barbosa; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliBackground: Risk scores for cardiac surgery cannot continue to be neglected. Objective: To assess the performance of ""Age, Creatinine and Ejection Fraction Score"" (ACEF Score) to predict mortality in patients submitted to elective coronary artery bypass graft and/or heart valve surgery, and to compare it to other scores. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with the database of a Brazilian tertiary care center. A total of 2,565 patients submitted to elective surgeries between May 2007 and July 2009 were assessed. For a more detailed analysis, the ACEF Score performance was compared to the InsCor's and EuroSCORE's performance through correlation, calibration and discrimination tests. Results: Patients were stratified into mild, moderate and severe for all models. Calibration was inadequate for ACEF Score (p = 0.046) and adequate for InsCor (p = 0.460) and EuroSCORE (p = 0.750). As for discrimination, the area under the ROC curve was questionable for the ACEF Score (0.625) and adequate for InsCor (0.744) and EuroSCORE (0.763). Conclusion: Although simple to use and practical, the ACEF Score, unlike InsCor and EuroSCORE, was not accurate for predicting mortality in patients submitted to elective coronary artery bypass graft and/or heart valve surgery in a Brazilian tertiary care center.
- The risk scores and risk for the BraSCORE dream(2012) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira
- On-pump or off-pump? Impact of risk scores in coronary artery bypass surgery(2012) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; PUIG, Luiz Boro; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliObjective: Remain controversies about the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the 2000 Bernstein Parsonnet (2000BP) and EuroSCORE (EU) for choice CPB in CABG. Methods: 1551 consecutive patients underwent CABG. CPB was used in 1,121 (72.3%) patients. The performance of 2000BP and EU was assessed by calibration, discrimination and correlation tests. For both risk scores, increasing the value of the score and presence of CPB were directly related to a higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Therefore with these two variables was constructed a logistic regression model for each risk score, in order to determine in which value of score the presence of CPB increases significantly the risk of death. Results: The calibration, like the area under the ROC curve for the group with CPB [2000BP=0.80; EU=0.78] and without CPB [2000BP=0.81; EU=0.85] were appropriate. The Spearman correlation for groups with and without CPB was 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.62 (P < 0.001), respectively. Using the 2000BP, for a value >17.75 the presence of CPB increased the chance of death to 7.4 [CI 95% (4.4-12.3), P < 0.0001]. With the EU, for a value >4.5 the presence of CPB increased the chance of death to 5.4 [CI 95% (3.3-9), P < 0.0001]. Conclusion: In decision making, the 2000BP>17.75 or the EU>4.5 guide to identify patients who underwent CABG with CPB increases significantly the chance of death.