LEANDRO EJNISMAN
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Inter and intra-observer agreement of the 3-dimensional CT based anterior inferior iliac spine classification system shows fair-to-moderate agreement among high volume hip surgeons(2023) EFRIMA, Ben; AMAR, Eyal; ROTMAN, Dani; ELIAS, Avital; EJNISMAN, Leandro; BONIN, Nicolas; ALBAGLI, Assaf; BENADY, Amit; SEGAL, Ortal; RATH, EhudPurpose The purpose of this multicenter, multinational study is to evaluate the agreement level of the Hetsroni's classification system across high-volume hip surgeons who specialize in hip preservation surgeries. Methods Four surgeons from three countries reviewed a digital survey that included 93 3D CT images of the hip from 53 patients. The population was composed of individuals who had undergone a pelvis CT scan in a tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2016. Each rater reviewed the images and classified each image according to AIIS subtype I, II, or III. After a minimum of two months, the raters repeated the survey. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was then assessed. The kappa values were calculated to determine variability. Results Inter-rater agreement levels yielded fair agreement for both sessions (Kappa = 0.4, p value < 0.001 in the first and Kappa = 0.27, p value < 0.001 in the second). Inter-rater agreement levels separating non-pathological Type I from pathological Types II and III yielded moderate to fair inter-rater agreement levels (K = 0.47, p value < 0.001 in the first session and k = 0.32, p value < 0.001 in the second). Intra-rater reliability displayed moderate agreement (average K = 0.53). Conclusion The current 3D CT-based AIIS classification system shows fair-to-moderate inter- and intra-rater agreement among high-volume hip surgeons. According to this study, the agreement of the Hetsroni classification system is not able to be sufficiently reproduced. Since accurate classification of the AIIS morphology is imperative in establishing proper treatment for SSI, this classification system there is therefore limited in its clinical value.
- Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons(2023) FABRICIO, Marcelo Zerbetto; RUDELLI, Bruno Alves; MIYAHARA, Helder de Souza; EJNISMAN, Leandro; GURGEL, Henrique de Melo Campos; CROCI, Alberto TesconiAbstract Objective The present study aims to assess the reproducibility of digital planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) among surgeons with different levels of experience. In addition, it attempts to determine the degree of planning reliability based on a contralateral THA or on a spherical marker positioned at the greater trochanter for calibration. Methods Two evaluators with different experience levels (A1 and A2) performed independently the retrospective digital surgical planning of 64 cementless THAs. Next, we compared the planning with the implants used in the surgery. The reproducibility was excellent when planning and implants were identical; proper in case of a single-unit variation; and inappropriate if there was variation in two or more units. The present analysis also determined the calibration accuracy between the contralateral THA and the spherical marker at the greater trochanter level. Results The present study demonstrated greater success when the most experienced evaluator performed the planning and greater accuracy for the contralateral THA. When splitting the analysis per parameter (contralateral THA or spherical marker), there was a statistical difference only for the planning of A1 and the implants used in the surgery. This difference occurred in the excellent category, with 67.3% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001), and in the inappropriate category, with 7.1% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001). Conclusions Digital planning is more accurate when performed by an experienced evaluator. The contralateral prosthesis head was a better reference than a marker on the greater trochanter.