ALBERTO AZOUBEL ANTUNES

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
24
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
LIM/55 - Laboratório de Urologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 23
  • article 14 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effects of Prostatic Artery Embolization on the Dynamic Component of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia as Assessed by Ultrasound Elastography: A Pilot Series
    (2019) ASSIS, Andre Moreira de; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar; MARCELINO, Antonio Sergio Zafred; CERRI, Luciana Mendes de Oliveira; ANTUNES, Alberto Azoubel; SROUGI, Miguel; CERRI, Giovanni Guido
    PurposeTo determine the effects of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) on prostaticelasticity as assessed by Ultrasound Elastography (US-E), as well as to describe the feasibility and role of US-E as a novel tool in both pre- and post-PAE evaluation.Materials and MethodsThis is a prospective, single-center investigation that included eight patients undergoing PAE for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Baseline and 3-month follow-up evaluations were performed and included prostate-specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessment using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire and the IPSS-Quality of life (QoL) item. US-E with measurement of the prostatic Elastic Modulus (EM) was performed before PAE and at 1-month follow-up.ResultsAfter PAE, US-E showed a significant reduction of prostatic EM as assessed in kPa (33.14 vs. 47.24, -29.8%, p=0.002) and in m/s (3.75 vs. 4.63, -19.0%, p<0.001). Also, the transitional/peripheral zone ratio was significantly reduced by 45.36% (0.53 vs. 0.97, p<0.05). All eight patients presented with significant LUTS improvement after PAE (p<0.05 for IPSS, QoL, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate and PSA).ConclusionsFindings described in this study suggest that PAE significantly reduces prostaticEM, leading to a positive effect on BPH dynamic component related to prostatic elasticity. Also, it features US-E as an additional tool for pre- and post-PAE evaluation, describing a novel indication for this technology.
  • article 135 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Quality of Life and Clinical Symptom Improvement Support Prostatic Artery Embolization for Patients with Acute Urinary Retention Caused by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    (2013) CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; MOTTA-LEAL-FILHO, Joaquim M. da; ANTUNES, Alberto A.; BARONI, Ronaldo H.; MARCELINO, Antonio S. Z.; CERRI, Luciana M. O.; YOSHINAGA, Eduardo M.; CERRI, Giovanni G.; SROUGI, Miguel
    Purpose: To show that prostatic artery embolization (PAE) improves quality of life (QoL) and lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: This was a single-center prospective study of PAE in 11 patients with BPH managed With indwelling. urinary catheters. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), ultrasound, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, QoL, and urodynamic tests were used. to assess outcomes. Prostate size ranged from 30 to 90 g, and embolizations were performed with 300-500-mu m Embosphere microspheres. Results: The rate of technical success (ie, bilateral PAE) was 75%, and the rate of clinical success (ie, catheter removal and symptom improvement) was 91% (10 of 11 patients). Postembolization syndrome manifested as mild pain in the perineum, retropubic area, and/or urethra. Ten of 11 patients urinated spontaneously after Foley catheter removal 4-25 days after PAE (mean, 12.1 d). No major complications Were observed. Follow-up ranged from 19 to 48 months. than asymptomatic patient, a discrete area of hypoperfusion: suggesting small ischemia of the bladder was observed on 30-day MR imaging follow-up, but the bladder was normal on 90-day MR imaging. After 1 year, mean prostate volume reduction was greater than 30%, symptoms were mild (mean IPSS, 2.8 +/- 2.1; P = .04),. no erectile dysfunction was observed, and QoL,improved significantly (mean , 0.4 +/- 0.5; P = .001) using the paired t test. Conclusions: Patients with severe symptoms and acute urinary retention caused by BPH can be treated Safely by PAE, which improves clinical symptoms and QoL.
  • article 12 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prostatic Tissue Elimination After Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE): A Report of Three Cases
    (2017) LEITE, Leandro Cardarelli; ASSIS, Andre Moreira de; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; HARWARD, Sardis Honoria; ANTUNES, Alberto Azoubel; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar
    We report three cases of spontaneous prostatic tissue elimination through the urethra while voiding following technically successful prostatic artery embolization (PAE) as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). All patients were embolized with 100- to 300-mu m microspheres alone or in combination with 300- to 500-mu m microspheres. During follow-up prior to eliminating the tissue fragments, the three patients all presented with intermittent periods of LUTS improvement and aggravation. After expelling the prostatic tissue between 1 and 5 months of follow-up, significant improvements in LUTS and urodynamic parameters were observed in all patients. Urethral obstruction after PAE caused by sloughing prostate tissue is a potential complication of the procedure and should be considered in patients with recurrent LUTS in order to avoid inappropriate management.
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Impact of 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors Use at the Time of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction
    (2019) CARDARELLI-LEITE, Leandro; ASSIS, Andre M. de; MOREIRA, Airton M.; ANTUNES, Alberto A.; CERRI, Giovanni G.; SROUGI, Miguel; CARNEVALE, Francisco C.
    Purpose: To compare the 12-month post-prostatic artery embolization (PAE) clinical outcomes of patients who were and were not taking 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) at the time of PAE. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent PAE from 2010 to 2017 due to lower urinary tract symptoms, secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). One hundred fifty-five patients were included and divided in 2 groups; these groups did not present statistically significant differences in their baseline characteristics-those taking 5ARIS (Y-5ARIs, n = 40) and those not taking 5ARIs (N-5ARIs, n = 115). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the sub-item Quality of Life (QoL), and the incidence of clinical failure were used as primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included mean prostate volume reduction and mean peak flow rate (Q(max)) improvement. Clinical failure or recurrence was defined as absence of symptomatic improvement (IPSS >= 8 or QoL >= 3) or the need for invasive BPH treatment (PAE or transurethral resection of the prostate) during the 12-month follow-up period. Results: After 12-month follow-up, IPSS, QoL, and prostatic volume were significantly lower compared to baseline in both groups, and Q(max) showed a significant increase. No statistically significant differences were observed in outcomes between N-5ARIs and Y-5ARIs, and the clinical failure rate for both groups was approximately 20%. Conclusions: The use of 5ARIs did not show a detrimental effect on clinical outcomes of PAE, in either subjective (IPSS, QoL, and clinical failure) or objective (prostatic volume and Q(max)) parameters.
  • article 79 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Clinical, Laboratorial, and Urodynamic Findings of Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Urinary Retention Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study
    (2013) ANTUNES, Alberto A.; CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; LEAL FILHO, Joaquim M. da Motta; YOSHINAGA, Eduardo M.; CERRI, Luciana M. O.; BARONI, Ronaldo H.; MARCELINO, Antonio S. Z.; CERRI, Giovanni G.; SROUGI, Miguel
    This study was designed to describe the clinical, laboratorial, and urodynamic findings of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A prospective study of 11 patients with urinary retention due to BPH was conducted. Patients underwent physical examination, prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement, transrectal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and urodynamic testing were used to assess the outcome before and after 1 year. Clinical success was 91 % (10/11 patients) with a mean follow-up of 22.3 months (range, 12-41 months). At the first year follow-up, the mean IPSS score was 2.8 points (p = 0.04), mean QoL was 0.4 points (p = 0.001), mean PSA decreased from 10.1 to 4.3 ng/mL (p = 0.003), maximum urinary flow (Qmax) improved from 4.2 to 10.8 mL/sec (p = 0.009), and detrusor pressure (Pdet) decreased from 85.7 to 51.5 cm H2O (p = 0.007). Before PAE, Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) showed values > 40 in 100 % of patients. After PAE, 30 % of patients were > 40 (obstructed), 40 % were between 20 and 40 (undetermined), and 30 % were < 20 (unobstructed). Patients with a BOOI < 20 had higher PSA values at 1-day after PAE. Clinical and urodynamic parameters improved significantly after PAE in patients with acute urinary retention due to BPH. Total PSA at day 1 after PAE was higher in patients with unobstructed values in pressure flow studies.
  • article 9 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Does Not Influence the Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization
    (2021) MEIRA, Marcio; ASSIS, Andre M. de; MOREIRA, Airton M.; ANTUNES, Alberto A.; CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; SROUGI, Miguel
    Purpose: To compare the outcomes of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with different intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) grades. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 128 patients (aged 50-86 years) who underwent PAE from 2013 to 2017. IPP grades were classified as follows: grade 1 (<10 mm), grade II (10-19 mm), and grade III (>= 20 min). Nineteen patients (14.8%) had grade I [mean [PP 7.8 mm, prostatic volume (PV) 64.1 cm(3)], 77 (60.2%) had grade II (mean IPP 14.9 win, PV 87.0 cm(3)), and 32 (25%) had grade III (mean IPP 26.2 mm, PV 132.6 cm(3)), P < .01. The outcomes, including PV, international prostate symptom score (1PSS), and quality of life (QoL), were compared between the IPP grades at the 12-month follow-up. Clinical failure was defined as IPSS >7 or QoL >2. Results: IPP decreased (I: -8.2%, II: -27.3%, and III: -38.7%, P = .01), and all other endpoints improved (P < .01). Adjusted covariance analysis, considering baseline PV as a confounding factor, showed no correlation between the 12-month outcomes and baseline IPP. Clinical failure was observed in 17/128 patients (13.3%) and was similar in prevalence among the IPP groups (P = .20). Minor complications occurred in 43 patients (33.6%) and major in 3 (2.3%). There were statistical differences in the complications between IPP grades II and III (P < .01). Conclusions: PAE was similarly effective in all the IPP grades at the 12-month follow-up, and there was no difference in the clinical failure between the groups. Complications in IPP Bade II were more frequent than those in IPP grade II.
  • article 82 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prostatic Artery Embolization for Enlarged Prostates Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. How I Do It
    (2013) CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; ANTUNES, Alberto A.
    Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has emerged as an alternative to surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patient selection and refined technique are essential for good results. Urodynamic evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging are very important and technical limitations are related to elderly patients with tortuous and atherosclerotic vessels, anatomical variations, difficulty visualizing and catheterizing small diameter arteries feeding the prostate, and the potential risk of bladder and rectum ischemia. The use of small-diameter hydrophilic microcatheters is mandatory. Patients can be treated safely by PAE with low rates of side effects, reducing prostate volume with clinical symptoms and quality of life improvement without urinary incontinence, ejaculatory disorders, or erectile dysfunction. A multidisciplinary approach with urologists and interventional radiologists is essential to achieve better results.
  • article 57 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Transient Ischemic Rectitis as a Potential Complication after Prostatic Artery Embolization: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    (2013) MOREIRA, Airton Mota; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; ANTUNES, Alberto Azoubel; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; ARIZA, Miguel Angel de Gregorio; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar
    Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is an alternative treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Complications are primarily related to non-target embolization. We report a case of ischemic rectitis in a 76-year-old man with significant lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, probably related to nontarget embolization. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an 85.5-g prostate and urodynamic studies confirmed Inferior vesical obstruction. PAE was performed bilaterally. During the first 3 days of follow-up, a small amount of blood mixed in the stool was observed. Colonoscopy identified rectal ulcers at day 4, which had then disappeared by day 16 post PAE without treatment. PAE is a safe, effective procedure with a low complication rate, but interventionalists should be aware of the risk of rectal nontarget embolization.
  • article 37 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    The histology of prostate tissue following prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    (2013) CAMARA-LOPES, George; MATTEDI, Romulo; ANTUNES, Alberto A.; CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; CERRI, Giovanni G.; SROUGI, Miguel; ALVES, Venancio A.; LEITE, Katia R. M.
    Objective: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is believed to be a safe procedure with a low risk of adverse side effects. Artery embolization is a viable treatment option in patients who are refractory to the classic noninvasive treatments. Knowledge of the histological characteristics of prostate tissue following the procedure is still limited. In this study, we describe the microscopic aspects of the prostate following PAE for BPH. Materials and Methods: Two patients underwent transurethral resections of the prostate (TURP) after PAE. Embolizations were performed under local anesthesia with an initial pelvic angiography to evaluate the iliac vessels and the prostate arteries using a 2.8 French microcatheter. The prostate was embolized with 300-500 mu m Microspheres (Embosphere (R)), using complete blood stasis as the end point. The prostate tissues were analyzed histologically to characterize the effects of the embolization. Results: The embolic material within the prostate tissue was easily identified as homogeneous, bright eosin-red spheroids filling the vessel lumens. Ischemic necrosis surrounded or not by chronic inflammatory reactions containing macrophages were considered as a result of the artery embolization. Also, some aspects related to the healing process were observed being fibrotic nodules surrounded by glands with squamous metaplasia of the epithelial lining the most important. In the remaining sections, due to the precocious surgical intervention, the classic findings of BPH were still present with the glandular and stromal hyperplasia associated with nonspecific chronic prostatitis. Conclusions: This is the first description of prostate histology in BPH patients treated by PAE, a new procedure that is being used increasingly as a therapeutic intervention. The recognition of the changes caused by this new modality of treatment has become a very important differential in a chronic granulomatous reaction of the prostate tissue.
  • article 94 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    The ""PErFecTED Technique"": Proximal Embolization First, Then Embolize Distal for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    (2014) CARNEVALE, Francisco C.; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; ANTUNES, Alberto A.
    Prostatic artery embolization requires a refined technique to achieve good imaging and clinical success. The PErFecTED (Proximal Embolization First, Then Embolize Distal) technique has produced greater prostate ischemia and infarction than previously described methods with clinical improvement of lower urinary symptoms and lower recurrence rates. The microcatheter should cross any collateral branch to the bladder, rectum, corpus cavernosum, gonad, or penis and be placed distally into the prostatic artery before its branching to the central gland and peripheral zone. This technique allows better distribution of embolic material in the intraprostatic arteries and reduces risk of spasm or thrombus. Because benign prostatic hyperplasia develops primarily in the periurethral region of the prostate, the urethral group of arteries should be embolized first. Subsequent distal investigation and embolization completes occlusion and stasis of blood flow to the prostatic parenchyma. Since we added the second step to the PErFecTED technique, we have observed infarcts in all patients submitted to prostatic artery embolization.