REGIS OTAVIANO FRANCA BEZERRA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
7
Lattes
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/44 - Laboratório de Ressonância Magnética em Neurorradiologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Revista / Livro: Ecancermedicalscience ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Real-world evidence on first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with non-clear cell and sarcomatoid histologies: are sunitinib and pazopanib interchangeable?
    (2019) BONADIO, Renata Colombo; VELHO, Pedro Isaacsson; MARTA, Guilherme Nader; NARDA, Mirella; SOUZA, Manoel Carlos La; MUNIZ, David Q. B.; BEZERRA, Regis O. F.; BISPO, Raisa K. A.; FARAJ, Sheila F.; BASTOS, Diogo A.; DZIK, Carlos
    Introduction: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) are underrepresented in clinical trials. Treatment approaches are frequently extrapolated from data of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, in which pazopanib is non-inferior to sunitinib. We aim to compare the effectiveness of first-line sunitinib and pazopanib for nccRCC and sRCC. Methods: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of patients with metastatic nccRCC and sRCC treated with first-line sunitinib or pazopanib at an academic cancer centre. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were measured. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used for time-to-event data. Cox regression was used for prognostic factors. Results: Fifty-three patients were included; 16 (30.1%) treated with sunitinib and 37 (69.9%) with pazopanib. Forty-six (86.8%) patients had nccRCC and 7 (13.2%) had sRCC. The majority had intermediate or poor International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk (93%). Median PFS was 6.6 months with sunitinib and 4.9 months with pazopanib (HR 1.75; P = 0.078). Treatment with pazopanib was associated with inferior OS in comparison with sunitinib (median OS: 30.4 months versus 8.7 months; HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.31-5.58, P = 0.007). These results were confirmed in subgroup analysis of patients with papillary, chromophobe and MiT family translocation histologies (median OS: 38.7 months versus 14.7 months; HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.20-8.29, P = 0.019). Unclassified and sarcomatoid histologies had inferior OS (median: 6.9 and 1.1 months, respectively) regardless of the treatment used. Conclusion: In this patient cohort, pazopanib was associated with inferior OS in comparison with sunitinib for metastatic nccRCC. Larger trials are ideally warranted to confirm these results.
  • article 15 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Guidelines for the management of neuroendocrine tumours by the Brazilian gastrointestinal tumour group
    (2017) RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.; WESCHENFELDER, Rui F.; COSTA, Frederico P.; ANDRADE, Aline Chaves; OSVALDT, Alessandro Bersch; QUIDUTE, Ana Rosa P.; SANTOS, Allan dos; HOFF, Ana Amelia O.; GUMZ, Brenda; BUCHPIGUEL, Carlos; PEREIRA, Bruno S. Vilhena; LOURENCO JUNIOR, Delmar Muniz; ROCHA FILHO, Duilio Reis da; FONSECA, Eduardo Antunes; MELLO, Eduardo Linhares Riello; MAKDISSI, Fabio Ferrari; WAECHTER, Fabio Luiz; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar; COURA-FILHO, George B.; PAULO, Gustavo Andrade de; GIROTTO, Gustavo Colagiovanni; BEZERRA NETO, Joao Evangelista; GLASBERG, Joao; CASALI-DA-ROCHA, Jose Claudio; REGO, Juliana Florinda M.; MEIRELLES, Luciana Rodrigues de; HAJJAR, Ludhmila; MENEZES, Marcos; BRONSTEIN, Marcello D.; SAPIENZA, Marcelo Tatit; FRAGOSO, Maria Candida Barisson Villares; PEREIRA, Maria Adelaide Albergaria; BARROS, Milton; FORONES, Nora Manoukian; AMARAL, Paulo Cezar Galvao do; MEDEIROS, Raphael Salles Scortegagna de; ARAUJO, Raphael L. C.; BEZERRA, Regis Otaviano Franca; PEIXOTO, Renata D'Alpino; AGUIAR JR., Samuel; RIBEIRO JR., Ulysses; PFIFFER, Tulio; HOFF, Paulo M.; COUTINHO, Anelisa K.
    Neuroendocrine tumours are a heterogeneous group of diseases with a significant variety of diagnostic tests and treatment modalities. Guidelines were developed by North American and European groups to recommend their best management. However, local particularities and relativisms found worldwide led us to create Brazilian guidelines. Our consensus considered the best feasible strategies in an environment involving more limited resources. We believe that our recommendations may be extended to other countries with similar economic standards.